Chang Tara I, Reboussin David M, Chertow Glenn M, Cheung Alfred K, Cushman William C, Kostis William J, Parati Gianfranco, Raj Dominic, Riessen Erik, Shapiro Brian, Stergiou George S, Townsend Raymond R, Tsioufis Konstantinos, Whelton Paul K, Whittle Jeffrey, Wright Jackson T, Papademetriou Vasilios
From the Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (T.I.C., G.M.C.); Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (D.M.R.); Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Utah and Renal Section, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System (A.K.C.); Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, TN (W.C.C.); Division of Cardiovascular Disease and Hypertension, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (W.J.K.); Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy (G.P.); St. Luke Hospital, Italian Auxology Institute, Milan, Italy (G.P.); Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, George Washington University, Washington, DC (D.R.); Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT (E.R.); Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL (B.S.); School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece (G.S.S., K.T.); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (R.R.T.); Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA (P.K.W.); Primary Care Division, Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI (J.W.); Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH (J.T.W.); and Department of Veterans Affairs and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.P.).
Hypertension. 2017 Oct;70(4):751-758. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09788. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
Studies of visit-to-visit office blood pressure (BP) variability (OBPV) as a predictor of cardiovascular events and death in high-risk patients treated to lower BP targets are lacking. We conducted a post hoc analysis of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), a well-characterized cohort of participants randomized to intensive (<120 mm Hg) or standard (<140 mm Hg) systolic BP targets. We defined OBPV as the coefficient of variation of the systolic BP using measurements taken during the 3-,6-, 9-, and 12-month study visits. In our cohort of 7879 participants, older age, female sex, black race, current smoking, chronic kidney disease, and coronary disease were independent determinants of higher OBPV. Use of thiazide-type diuretics or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers was associated with lower OBPV whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with higher OBPV. There was no difference in OBPV in participants randomized to standard or intensive treatment groups. We found that OBPV had no significant associations with the composite end point of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (n=324 primary end points; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.69, highest versus lowest quintile) nor with heart failure or stroke. The highest quintile of OBPV (versus lowest) was associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.92; confidence interval, 1.22-3.03) although the association of OBPV overall with all-cause mortality was marginal (=0.07). Our results suggest that clinicians should continue to focus on office BP control rather than on OBPV unless definitive benefits of reducing OBPV are shown in prospective trials.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01206062.
缺乏关于就诊间诊室血压(BP)变异性(OBPV)作为接受较低血压目标治疗的高危患者心血管事件和死亡预测指标的研究。我们对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)进行了事后分析,该试验是一个特征明确的队列,参与者被随机分配至强化收缩压目标(<120 mmHg)或标准收缩压目标(<140 mmHg)。我们将OBPV定义为使用在3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月研究访视期间所测收缩压的变异系数。在我们7879名参与者的队列中,年龄较大、女性、黑人种族、当前吸烟、慢性肾脏病和冠心病是较高OBPV的独立决定因素。使用噻嗪类利尿剂或二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂与较低OBPV相关,而使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与较高OBPV相关。随机分配至标准治疗组或强化治疗组的参与者在OBPV方面无差异。我们发现OBPV与致命和非致命心血管事件的复合终点(n = 324个主要终点;校正风险比,1.20;95%置信区间,0.85 - 1.69,最高五分位数与最低五分位数相比)以及心力衰竭或中风均无显著关联。OBPV最高五分位数(与最低五分位数相比)与全因死亡率相关(校正风险比,1.92;置信区间,1.22 - 3.03),尽管OBPV总体与全因死亡率的关联微弱(P = 0.07)。我们的结果表明,临床医生应继续关注诊室血压控制而非OBPV,除非前瞻性试验显示降低OBPV有明确益处。