• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基础舒张压对强化与标准血压控制效果影响的研究。

Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on Effects of Intensive Compared With Standard Blood Pressure Control.

机构信息

Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, UT (S.B., A.K.C.)

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension (S.B., A.K.C., G.W.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):134-143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030848. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030848
PMID:29021322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5760457/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In individuals with a low diastolic blood pressure (DBP), the potential benefits or risks of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering are unclear.

METHODS

SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) was a randomized controlled trial that compared the effects of intensive (target <120 mm Hg) and standard (target <140 mm Hg) SBP control in 9361 older adults with high blood pressure at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular disease events. All-cause death and incident chronic kidney disease were secondary outcomes. This post hoc analysis examined whether the effects of the SBP intervention differed by baseline DBP.

RESULTS

Mean baseline SBP and DBP were 139.7±15.6 and 78.1±11.9 mm Hg, respectively. Regardless of the randomized treatment, baseline DBP had a U-shaped association with the hazard of the primary cardiovascular disease outcome. However, the effects of the intensive SBP intervention on the primary outcome were not influenced by baseline DBP level ( for interaction=0.83). The primary outcome hazard ratio for intensive versus standard treatment was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.07) in the lowest DBP quintile (mean baseline DBP, 61±5 mm Hg) and 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.90) in the upper 4 DBP quintiles (mean baseline DBP, 82±9 mm Hg), with an interaction value of 0.78. Results were similar for all-cause death and kidney events.

CONCLUSIONS

Low baseline DBP was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease events, but there was no evidence that the benefit of the intensive SBP lowering differed by baseline DBP.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

摘要

背景

在舒张压(DBP)较低的个体中,强化收缩压(SBP)降低的潜在益处或风险尚不清楚。

方法

SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)是一项随机对照试验,比较了强化(目标<120mmHg)和标准(目标<140mmHg)SBP 控制在 9361 名患有高血压且心血管疾病风险增加的老年人中的效果。主要结局是心血管疾病事件的综合指标。全因死亡和新发慢性肾脏病是次要结局。本事后分析检查了 SBP 干预的效果是否因基线 DBP 而不同。

结果

平均基线 SBP 和 DBP 分别为 139.7±15.6 和 78.1±11.9mmHg。无论随机治疗如何,基线 DBP 与主要心血管疾病结局的风险呈 U 形关联。然而,强化 SBP 干预对主要结局的影响不受基线 DBP 水平的影响(交互作用值=0.83)。在最低 DBP 五分位数(平均基线 DBP,61±5mmHg)中,强化治疗与标准治疗相比,主要结局的危险比为 0.78(95%置信区间,0.57-1.07),在 4 个较高 DBP 五分位数中(平均基线 DBP,82±9mmHg),危险比为 0.74(95%置信区间,0.61-0.90),交互作用值为 0.78。全因死亡和肾脏事件的结果相似。

结论

低基线 DBP 与心血管疾病事件风险增加相关,但没有证据表明强化 SBP 降低的益处因基线 DBP 而异。

临床试验注册

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01206062。

相似文献

1
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on Effects of Intensive Compared With Standard Blood Pressure Control.基础舒张压对强化与标准血压控制效果影响的研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):134-143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030848. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
2
Influence of baseline systolic blood pressure on the relationship between intensive blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).强化血压控制与心血管结局试验(SPRINT)中基线收缩压对血压控制与心血管结局关系的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Mar;108(3):273-281. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1353-9. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
3
Influence of Prediabetes on the Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Kidney Events.糖尿病前期对强化收缩压控制对肾脏事件影响的影响。
Am J Hypertens. 2019 Nov 15;32(12):1170-1177. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz105.
4
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on the Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering: Results From the STEP Randomized Trial.基线舒张压对强化降压效果的影响:来自 STEP 随机试验的结果。
Hypertension. 2023 Dec;80(12):2572-2580. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21892. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
5
Achieved blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: results from ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials.在高危患者中实现血压和心血管结局:ONTARGET 和 TRANSCEND 试验结果。
Lancet. 2017 Jun 3;389(10085):2226-2237. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30754-7. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
6
Association of Blood Pressure Measurements With Peripheral Artery Disease Events.血压测量与外周动脉疾病事件的关联。
Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):1805-1814. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033348.
7
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
8
The Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on the Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes.基础舒张压对强化降压对 2 型糖尿病心血管结局和全因死亡率影响的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1878-1884. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2047. Epub 2020 May 4.
9
Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Outcomes in SPRINT Participants with Chronic Kidney Disease.SPRINT 研究中合并慢性肾脏病患者的基础舒张压与心血管结局。
Kidney360. 2020 Mar 31;1(5):368-375. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000982019. eCollection 2020 May 28.
10
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Hypertension: SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).强化降压对高血压患者左心室肥厚的影响:收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)
Circulation. 2017 Aug 1;136(5):440-450. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028441. Epub 2017 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Guide de pratique clinique en soins de première ligne d'Hypertension Canada pour le diagnostic et le traitement de l'hypertension artérielle chez les adultes.《加拿大高血压一线临床实践指南:成人动脉高血压的诊断与治疗》
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2025 Aug 18:17151635251352537. doi: 10.1177/17151635251352537.
2
A Risk Stratification Model for Predicting Benefits of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment: Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.一种用于预测强化血压治疗益处的风险分层模型:收缩压干预试验分析
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Aug;27(8):e70098. doi: 10.1111/jch.70098.
3
Guide de pratique clinique en soins de première ligne d'Hypertension Canada pour le diagnostic et le traitement de l'hypertension artérielle chez les adultes.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiovascular event rates and mortality according to achieved systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with stable coronary artery disease: an international cohort study.根据稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的收缩压和舒张压达标情况评估心血管事件发生率和死亡率:一项国际队列研究。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2142-2152. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31326-5. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
2
Diastolic Blood Pressure, Subclinical Myocardial Damage, and Cardiac Events: Implications for Blood Pressure Control.舒张压、亚临床心肌损伤与心脏事件:对血压控制的启示
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 18;68(16):1713-1722. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.754. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
3
《加拿大高血压一线临床实践指南:成人动脉高血压的诊断与治疗》
Can Fam Physician. 2025 Jul-Aug;71(7-8):e167-e184. doi: 10.46747/cfp.710708e167.
4
Hypertension Canada guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in adults in primary care.加拿大高血压学会基层医疗成人高血压诊断与治疗指南。
Can Fam Physician. 2025 Jul 29;71(7-8):467-482. doi: 10.46747/cfp.20250616001.
5
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
CMAJ. 2025 Jun 15;197(23):E656-E673. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241770-f.
6
Hypertension Canada guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in adults in primary care.加拿大高血压协会基层医疗中成人高血压诊断与治疗指南。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2025 May 27:17151635251343907. doi: 10.1177/17151635251343907.
7
Hypertension Canada guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in adults in primary care.加拿大高血压协会基层医疗成人高血压诊断与治疗指南。
CMAJ. 2025 May 25;197(20):E549-E564. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241770.
8
Accounting for the impact of rare variants on causal inference with RARE: a novel multivariable Mendelian randomization method.使用RARE评估罕见变异对因果推断的影响:一种新颖的多变量孟德尔随机化方法。
Brief Bioinform. 2025 May 1;26(3). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf214.
9
Ideal Blood Pressure Levels: So Long the J-Curve, Lower is Better.理想血压水平:告别J型曲线,越低越好。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 May 9;122(3):e20250150. doi: 10.36660/abc.20250150. eCollection 2025.
10
Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure, Cardiac Biomarkers, and Cardiovascular Mortality in Adults Without Cardiovascular Disease.无心血管疾病成年人的收缩压与舒张压、心脏生物标志物及心血管死亡率
JACC Adv. 2025 Mar 27;4(5):101678. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101678.
The J-Curve Phenomenon in Hypertension.
高血压中的J曲线现象
Pulse (Basel). 2016 Jul;4(1):49-60. doi: 10.1159/000446922. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
4
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
5
Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.强化降压对心血管和肾脏结局的影响:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):435-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00805-3. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
6
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
Impact of achieved blood pressures on mortality risk and end-stage renal disease among a large, diverse hypertension population.在一个庞大、多样的高血压人群中,所达到的血压对死亡风险和终末期肾病的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 12;64(6):588-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.065.
8
The design and rationale of a multicenter clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).一项比较两种收缩压控制策略的多中心临床试验的设计与原理:收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)
Clin Trials. 2014 Oct;11(5):532-46. doi: 10.1177/1740774514537404. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
9
Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people.血压与十二种心血管疾病的发病率:125万人的终生风险、健康生命年损失及特定年龄关联
Lancet. 2014 May 31;383(9932):1899-911. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60685-1.
10
Limitations of analyses based on achieved blood pressure: lessons from the African American study of kidney disease and hypertension trial.基于已达到的血压分析的局限性:来自非裔美国人肾脏病和高血压试验的教训。
Hypertension. 2011 Jun;57(6):1061-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.169367. Epub 2011 May 9.