From the Division of Cardiovascular Disease (V.P., J.K., G.A., P.A.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
Department of Medicine (N.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
Hypertension. 2020 Jun;75(6):1483-1490. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14690. Epub 2020 May 4.
We evaluated the impact of intensive blood pressure control on the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) and the prognostic implications of preexisting and new-onset AF in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) participants. New-onset AF was defined as occurrence of AF in 12-lead electrocardiograms after randomization in participants free of AF at baseline. Poisson regression modeling was used to calculate incident rates of new-onset AF. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (composite of myocardial infarction, non-myocardial infarction acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death). In 9327 participants, 8.45% had preexisting AF, and 1.65% had new-onset AF. The incidence of new-onset AF was 4.53 per 1000-person years, with similar rates in the standard and intensive treatment arms (4.95 versus 4.11 per 1000-person years; adjusted =0.14). Participants with preexisting AF (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.46-2.31]; <0.001) and new-onset AF (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.45 [95% CI, 1.58-3.80]; <0.001) had a greater risk for development of adverse cardiovascular events compared with those with no AF. Participants with preexisting AF who achieved blood pressure <120/80 mm Hg at 3 months continued have a poor prognosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.32-2.70]; =0.001) compared with those with no AF. Intensive blood pressure control does not diminish the incidence of new-onset AF in an older, high-risk, nondiabetic population. Both preexisting and new-onset AF have adverse prognostic implications. In participants with preexisting AF, residual cardiovascular risk is evident even with on-treatment blood pressure <120/80 mm Hg. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.
我们评估了强化降压治疗对新发心房颤动/扑动(AF)的影响,以及 SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)参与者中新发和原有 AF 的预后意义。新发 AF 定义为基线时无 AF 的参与者随机分组后 12 导联心电图中出现 AF。使用泊松回归模型计算新发 AF 的发生率。多变量调整 Cox 比例风险模型用于评估不良心血管事件(心肌梗死、非心肌梗死急性冠脉综合征、卒中和心力衰竭或心血管死亡的复合终点)的风险。在 9327 名参与者中,8.45%有原有 AF,1.65%有新发 AF。新发 AF 的发生率为 4.53/1000 人年,标准治疗组和强化治疗组的发生率相似(4.95 比 4.11/1000 人年;调整后 P=0.14)。有原有 AF(调整后的危险比 1.83 [95%CI,1.46-2.31];<0.001)和新发 AF(调整后的危险比 2.45 [95%CI,1.58-3.80];<0.001)的参与者发生不良心血管事件的风险更高。3 个月时血压<120/80mmHg 的有原有 AF 患者的预后仍较差(调整后的危险比 1.88 [95%CI,1.32-2.70];=0.001),与无 AF 的患者相比。在年龄较大、高危、非糖尿病人群中,强化降压治疗并不能降低新发 AF 的发生率。原有和新发 AF 均有不良预后意义。在有原有 AF 的患者中,即使在治疗期间血压<120/80mmHg,仍存在残余心血管风险。登记- URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01206062。