• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会行为认识论与科学界。

Social behavioural epistemology and the scientific community.

作者信息

Watve Milind

机构信息

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pune 411 008, India.

出版信息

J Genet. 2017 Jul;96(3):525-533. doi: 10.1007/s12041-017-0790-y.

DOI:10.1007/s12041-017-0790-y
PMID:28761017
Abstract

The progress of science is influenced substantially by social behaviour of and social interactions within the scientific community. Similar to innovations in primate groups, the social acceptance of an innovation depends not only upon the relevance of the innovation but also on the social dominance and connectedness of the innovator. There are a number of parallels between many well-known phenomena in behavioural evolution and various behavioural traits observed in the scientific community. It would be useful, therefore, to use principles of behavioural evolution as hypotheses to study the social behaviour of the scientific community. I argue in this paper that a systematic study of social behavioural epistemology is likely to boost the progress of science by addressing several prevalent biases and other problems in scientific communication and by facilitating appropriate acceptance/rejection of novel concepts.

摘要

科学的进步在很大程度上受到科学界的社会行为和社会互动的影响。与灵长类群体中的创新类似,一项创新的社会接受度不仅取决于创新的相关性,还取决于创新者的社会主导地位和人脉关系。行为进化中的许多著名现象与科学界观察到的各种行为特征之间存在诸多相似之处。因此,将行为进化的原理作为假设来研究科学界的社会行为可能会有所帮助。我在本文中认为,对社会行为认识论进行系统研究,有可能通过解决科学交流中几种普遍存在的偏见和其他问题,并促进对新概念的适当接受/拒绝,来推动科学的进步。

相似文献

1
Social behavioural epistemology and the scientific community.社会行为认识论与科学界。
J Genet. 2017 Jul;96(3):525-533. doi: 10.1007/s12041-017-0790-y.
2
Some frontiers in social science.社会科学中的一些前沿领域。
Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1898-900. doi: 10.1126/science.1130121.
3
Scientific racism: reflections on peer review, science and ideology.科学种族主义:关于同行评审、科学与意识形态的思考
Soc Sci Med. 1990;31(8):891-905; discussion 905-12. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90025-n.
4
Social structure and indirect genetic effects: genetics of social behaviour.社会结构和间接遗传效应:社会行为的遗传学。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 May;92(2):1027-1038. doi: 10.1111/brv.12267. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
5
[Social dominance and rank relationships in domestic pigs: a critical review].[家猪的社会支配与等级关系:批判性综述]
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1996 Nov-Dec;109(11-12):457-64.
6
Behavioural science: secret signals.行为科学:秘密信号。
Nature. 2009 Jan 29;457(7229):528-30. doi: 10.1038/457528a.
7
Unanimity in the social sciences with reference to epistemology, ontology, and scientific method.社会科学在认识论、本体论和科学方法方面的一致性。
Psychiatry. 1949 Aug;12(3):211-21. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1949.11022735.
8
Evolutionary epistemology as a scientific method: a new look upon the units and levels of evolution debate.作为一种科学方法的进化认识论:对进化辩论的单位和层次的新审视。
Theory Biosci. 2010 Sep;129(2-3):167-82. doi: 10.1007/s12064-010-0085-9. Epub 2010 May 26.
9
Natural science and medicine: social science and medicine: some methodological controversies.自然科学与医学:社会科学与医学:一些方法论上的争议。
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(6):643-57. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90454-3.
10
Expanding the social science of happiness.拓展幸福的社会科学。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Apr;2(4):248-252. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0308-5. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Chimpanzees copy dominant and knowledgeable individuals: implications for cultural diversity.黑猩猩会模仿占主导地位且知识渊博的个体:对文化多样性的影响。
Evol Hum Behav. 2015 Jan;36(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.09.002.
2
Towards an open science publishing platform.迈向一个开放科学出版平台。
F1000Res. 2016 Feb 3;5:130. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7968.1. eCollection 2016.
3
Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy.为什么我们认为自己知道自己知道的?盐争议的元知识分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;45(1):251-60. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv184. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Personal attributes of authors and reviewers, social bias and the outcomes of peer review: a case study.作者和审稿人的个人特质、社会偏见与同行评审结果:一项案例研究
F1000Res. 2015 Jan 22;4:21. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6012.2. eCollection 2015.
5
How do animal territories form and change? Lessons from 20 years of mechanistic modelling.动物领地是如何形成和变化的?20 年来机械建模的经验教训。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 16;281(1784):20140231. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0231. Print 2014 Jun 7.
6
Hyperinsulinemia drives diet-induced obesity independently of brain insulin production.高胰岛素血症可驱动饮食诱导的肥胖,而与脑胰岛素的产生无关。
Cell Metab. 2012 Dec 5;16(6):723-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.019.
7
Diabetes: have we got it all wrong? Hyperinsulinism as the culprit: surgery provides the evidence.糖尿病:我们是否完全搞错了?高胰岛素血症才是罪魁祸首:手术提供了证据。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):2438-42. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0684.
8
Diabetes: have we got it all wrong? Insulin hypersecretion and food additives: cause of obesity and diabetes?糖尿病:我们全错了吗?胰岛素分泌过多与食品添加剂:肥胖和糖尿病的成因?
Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):2432-7. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0825.
9
Toward a new model of scientific publishing: discussion and a proposal.迈向新的科学出版模式:讨论与建议
Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 Dec 5;5:55. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00055. eCollection 2011.
10
Expert bias in peer review.同行评审中的专家偏见。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Dec;27(12):2229-33. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.624090. Epub 2011 Oct 12.