Mol Psychiatry. 2018 May;23(5):1181-1188. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.154. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Two obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been published by independent OCD consortia, the International Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Foundation Genetics Collaborative (IOCDF-GC) and the OCD Collaborative Genetics Association Study (OCGAS), but many of the top-ranked signals were supported in only one study. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis from the two consortia, investigating a total of 2688 individuals of European ancestry with OCD and 7037 genomically matched controls. No single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reached genome-wide significance. However, in comparison with the two individual GWASs, the distribution of P-values shifted toward significance. The top haplotypic blocks were tagged with rs4733767 (P=7.1 × 10; odds ratio (OR)=1.21; confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.31, CASC8/CASC11), rs1030757 (P=1.1 × 10; OR=1.18; CI: 1.10-1.26, GRID2) and rs12504244 (P=1.6 × 10; OR=1.18; CI: 1.11-1.27, KIT). Variants located in or near the genes ASB13, RSPO4, DLGAP1, PTPRD, GRIK2, FAIM2 and CDH20, identified in linkage peaks and the original GWASs, were among the top signals. Polygenic risk scores for each individual study predicted case-control status in the other by explaining 0.9% (P=0.003) and 0.3% (P=0.0009) of the phenotypic variance in OCGAS and the European IOCDF-GC target samples, respectively. The common SNP heritability in the combined OCGAS and IOCDF-GC sample was estimated to be 0.28 (s.e.=0.04). Strikingly, ∼65% of the SNP-based heritability in the OCGAS sample was accounted for by SNPs with minor allele frequencies of ⩾40%. This joint analysis constituting the largest single OCD genome-wide study to date represents a major integrative step in elucidating the genetic causes of OCD.
两项强迫症 (OCD) 全基因组关联研究 (GWAS) 已由独立的 OCD 联盟发布,即国际强迫症基金会遗传学合作组织 (IOCDF-GC) 和 OCD 合作遗传学关联研究 (OCGAS),但许多排名最高的信号仅在一项研究中得到支持。因此,我们对这两个联盟进行了荟萃分析,共调查了 2688 名欧洲血统的 OCD 患者和 7037 名基因组匹配的对照。没有单个核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 达到全基因组显著水平。然而,与两项个体 GWAS 相比,P 值的分布向显著性转移。顶级单倍型块与 rs4733767(P=7.1×10;优势比 (OR)=1.21;置信区间 (CI): 1.12-1.31,CASC8/CASC11)、rs1030757(P=1.1×10;OR=1.18;CI:1.10-1.26,GRID2)和 rs12504244(P=1.6×10;OR=1.18;CI:1.11-1.27,KIT)相关。位于基因 ASB13、RSPO4、DLGAP1、PTPRD、GRIK2、FAIM2 和 CDH20 内或附近的变体,在连锁峰和原始 GWAS 中被鉴定为顶级信号。每个个体研究的多基因风险评分通过解释 OCGAS 和欧洲 IOCDF-GC 目标样本中分别为 0.9%(P=0.003)和 0.3%(P=0.0009)的表型方差,预测了另一项研究的病例对照状态。在合并的 OCGAS 和 IOCDF-GC 样本中,常见 SNP 遗传度估计为 0.28(s.e.=0.04)。引人注目的是,OCGAS 样本中基于 SNP 的遗传度的约 65%是由次要等位基因频率 ⩾40%的 SNP 解释的。这项构成迄今为止 OCD 全基因组研究中最大的单一分析的联合分析,是阐明 OCD 遗传原因的一个主要综合步骤。