Duff D Kathryn, De Souza Astrid M, Human Derek G, Potts James E, Harris Kevin C
Department of Sport Science, Douglas College, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada.
School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017 Apr 22;3(1):e000197. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000197. eCollection 2017.
Exercise testing in children is widely recommended for a number of clinical and prescriptive reasons. Many institutions continue to use the Bruce protocol for treadmill testing; however, with its incremental changes in speed and grade, it has challenges for practical application in children. We have developed a novel institutional protocol (British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH)), which may have better utility in paediatric populations.
To determine if our institutional protocol yields similar peak responses in minute ventilation (VE), oxygen consumption (VO), carbon dioxide production (VCO), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), metabolic equivalents (METS) and heart rate (HR) when compared with the traditional Bruce protocol.
On two different occasions, 70 children (boys=33; girls=37) aged 10-18 years completed an exercise test on a treadmill using each of the protocols. During each test, metabolic gas exchange parameters were measured. HR was monitored continuously during exercise using an HR monitor.
Physiological variables were similar between the two protocols (median (IQR); r): VE (L/min) (BCCH=96.7 (72.0-110.2); Bruce=99.2 (75.6-120.0); r=0.95), peak VO (mL/min) (BCCH=2897 (2342-3807); Bruce=2901 (2427-3654); r=0.94) and METS (BCCH=16.2 (14.8-17.7); Bruce=16.4 (14.7-17.9); r=0.89). RERs were similar (BCCH=1.00 (0.96-1.02); Bruce=1.03 (0.99-1.07); r=0.48). Total exercise time (in seconds) was longer for the BCCH protocol: BCCH=915 (829-1005); Bruce=810 (750-919); r=0.67.
The BCCH protocol produces similar peak exercise responses to the Bruce protocol and provides an alternative for clinical exercise testing in children.
出于多种临床和指导性原因,广泛推荐对儿童进行运动测试。许多机构仍在使用布鲁斯方案进行跑步机测试;然而,由于其速度和坡度的递增变化,在儿童中的实际应用存在挑战。我们制定了一种新的机构方案(不列颠哥伦比亚儿童医院(BCCH)),该方案在儿科人群中可能具有更好的实用性。
确定与传统布鲁斯方案相比,我们的机构方案在分钟通气量(VE)、耗氧量(VO)、二氧化碳产生量(VCO)、呼吸交换率(RER)、代谢当量(METS)和心率(HR)方面是否产生相似的峰值反应。
在两个不同的时间点,70名年龄在10至18岁的儿童(男孩33名;女孩37名)使用每种方案在跑步机上完成了一次运动测试。在每次测试期间,测量代谢气体交换参数。运动期间使用心率监测器连续监测心率。
两种方案的生理变量相似(中位数(四分位间距);r):VE(升/分钟)(BCCH = 96.7(72.0 - 110.2);布鲁斯 = 99.2(75.6 - 120.0);r = 0.95),峰值VO(毫升/分钟)(BCCH = 2897(2342 - 3807);布鲁斯 = 2901(2427 - 3654);r = 0.94)和METS(BCCH = 16.2(14.8 - 17.7);布鲁斯 = 16.4(14.7 - 17.9);r = 0.89)。RERs相似(BCCH = 1.00(0.96 - 1.02);布鲁斯 = 1.03(0.99 - 1.07);r = 0.48)。BCCH方案的总运动时间(以秒为单位)更长:BCCH = 915(829 - 1005);布鲁斯 = 810(750 - 919);r = 0.67。
BCCH方案产生的峰值运动反应与布鲁斯方案相似,并为儿童临床运动测试提供了一种替代方案。