Research Centre for Society and Health, Buckinghamshire New University , Buckinghamshire, UK.
J Sports Sci Med. 2008 Mar 1;7(1):15-22. eCollection 2008.
The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement and consistency between gas exchange variables measured by two online metabolic systems during an incremental exercise test. After obtaining local ethics approval and informed consent, 15 healthy subjects performed an incremental exercise test to volitional fatigue using the Bruce protocol. The Innocor (Innovision, Denmark) and CardiO2 (Medical Graphics, USA) systems were placed in series, with the Innocor mouthpiece attached to the pneumotach of the CardiO2. Metabolic data were analysed during the last 30 seconds of each stage and at peak exercise. There were non- significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two systems in estimation of oxygen consumption (VO2) and in minute ventilation (VE). Mean Cronbach's alpha for VO2 and VE were 0.88 and 0.92. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that limits of agreement were -0.52 to 0.55 l.min(-1) for VO2, and -8.74 to 10.66 l.min(-1) for VE. Carbon dioxide production (VCO2) and consequently respiratory exchange ratio (RER) measured by the Innocor were significantly lower (p < 0.05) through all stages. The CardiO2 measured fraction of expired carbon dioxide (FeCO2) significantly higher (p < 0.05). The limits of agreement for VO2 and VE are wide and unacceptable in cardio-pulmonary exercise testing. The Innocor reported VCO2 systematically lower. Therefore the Innocor and CardiO2 metabolic systems cannot be used interchangeably without affecting the diagnosis of an individual patient. Results from the present study support previous suggestion that considerable care is needed when comparing metabolic data obtained from different automated metabolic systems. Key pointsThere is general concern regarding the limited knowledge available about the accuracy of a number of commercially available systems.Demonstrated limits of agreement between key gas exchange variables (oxygen consumption and minute ventilation) as measured by the two metabolic systems were wide and unacceptable in cardio-pulmonary exercise testing.Considerable care is needed when comparing metabolic data obtained from different automated metabolic systems.
本研究旨在评估两种在线代谢系统在递增运动测试中测量的气体交换变量之间的一致性。在获得当地伦理委员会批准和知情同意后,15 名健康受试者使用 Bruce 方案进行递增运动测试至力竭。Innocor(Innovision,丹麦)和 CardiO2(Medical Graphics,美国)系统串联放置,Innocor 咬嘴连接到 CardiO2 的气流计。在每个阶段的最后 30 秒和运动峰值时分析代谢数据。两种系统在估计耗氧量(VO2)和分钟通气量(VE)方面没有显著差异(p>0.05)。VO2 和 VE 的平均 Cronbach's alpha 值分别为 0.88 和 0.92。Bland-Altman 分析显示,VO2 的一致性界限为-0.52 至 0.55 l.min(-1),VE 的一致性界限为-8.74 至 10.66 l.min(-1)。Innocor 测量的二氧化碳产生量(VCO2)和因此呼吸交换率(RER)在所有阶段均显著降低(p<0.05)。CardiO2 测量的呼气二氧化碳分数(FeCO2)显著升高(p<0.05)。VO2 和 VE 的一致性界限较宽,在心肺运动测试中无法接受。Innocor 报告的 VCO2 系统地较低。因此,如果不影响个体患者的诊断,Innocor 和 CardiO2 代谢系统不能互换使用。本研究结果支持先前的建议,即在比较来自不同自动化代谢系统的代谢数据时需要非常谨慎。关键点人们普遍关注许多市售系统的准确性方面的知识有限。两种代谢系统测量的关键气体交换变量(耗氧量和分钟通气量)之间的一致性界限较宽,在心肺运动测试中无法接受。在比较来自不同自动化代谢系统的代谢数据时需要非常谨慎。