Lo Grace C, Besa Cecilia, King Michael J, Kang Martin, Stueck Ashley, Thung Swan, Wagner Mathilde, Smith Andrew D, Taouli Bachir
Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Eur J Radiol Open. 2017 Jul 21;4:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2017.07.001. eCollection 2017.
To assess intra-observer, inter-observer and inter-modality (CT vs. MRI) reproducibility of liver surface nodularity (LSN) scores measured with software used for detection of liver fibrosis.
This IRB-approved retrospective study included patients with both abdominal CT and MRI within 6 months of histopathologic sampling. Two independent observers used post-processing software to quantify LSN scores on axial non-contrast CT (NCT), axial contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), axial T2-weighted (T2W) HASTE, and axial and coronal post-gadoxetic acid T1-weighted (T1W) images obtained during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Ten slices were used to acquire the LSN scores. Intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-modality (CT vs. MRI) reproducibility were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficients of variability (CV). Accuracy for detection of cirrhosis was evaluated for each technique.
26 patients (M/F 19/7, mean age 57 years), including 7 with cirrhosis (26.9%), were assessed. Technical failure occurred with NCT (1/23, 4.3%) and T2 HASTE (8/28, 28.6%). Intra-observer reproducibility was excellent for NCT, CECT, axial and coronal T1W HBP [ICC ≥ 0.92, CV ≤ 8%]. Inter-observer reproducibility was also excellent for NCT and CECT (ICC ≥ 0.95, CV ≤ 7.3%) and for coronal T1W HBP (ICC = 0.84, CV = 5.6%). There was fair to moderate agreement between CT and MRI (ICC 0.20-0.44). There were significant differences in mean LSN scores between non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients with NCT (2.6 vs. 4.2, p = 0.04) and T1W HBP (3.7 vs. 4.6; p = 0.01) images, with AUCs of 0.81 and 0.82, respectively.
LSN measurement is highly reproducible with NCT and post-contrast T1W HBP on MRI, with different results obtained between CT and MRI.
评估使用用于检测肝纤维化的软件测量肝脏表面结节性(LSN)评分时观察者内、观察者间以及不同模态(CT与MRI)之间的可重复性。
这项经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的回顾性研究纳入了在组织病理学采样6个月内同时接受腹部CT和MRI检查的患者。两名独立观察者使用后处理软件对轴向平扫CT(NCT)、轴向增强CT(CECT)、轴向T2加权(T2W)HASTE序列以及肝胆期(HBP)获得的轴向和冠状位钆塞酸增强T1加权(T1W)图像上的LSN评分进行量化。使用十层图像来获取LSN评分。通过组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CV)评估观察者内、观察者间以及不同模态(CT与MRI)之间的可重复性。对每种技术检测肝硬化的准确性进行评估。
共评估了26例患者(男/女19/7,平均年龄57岁),其中7例患有肝硬化(26.9%)。NCT(1/23,4.3%)和T2 HASTE序列(8/28,28.6%)出现技术失败。NCT、CECT、轴向和冠状位T1W HBP序列的观察者内可重复性极佳[ICC≥0.92,CV≤8%]。NCT和CECT序列(ICC≥0.95,CV≤7.3%)以及冠状位T1W HBP序列(ICC = 0.84,CV = 5.6%)的观察者间可重复性也极佳。CT与MRI之间的一致性为中等至良好(ICC 0.20 - 0.44)。在NCT(2.6对4.2,p = 0.04)和T1W HBP序列(3.7对4.6;p = 0.01)图像上,非肝硬化患者与肝硬化患者的平均LSN评分存在显著差异,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.81和0.82。
NCT以及MRI上的钆塞酸增强后T1W HBP序列对LSN的测量具有高度可重复性,CT与MRI之间结果不同。