From Institute for Global Health, University College London; Public Health England; and Royal Free London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):248-255. doi: 10.7326/M17-0609. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is an important component of tuberculosis (TB) control, and this study updates a previous network meta-analysis of the best LTBI treatment options to inform public health action and programmatic management of LTBI.
To evaluate the comparative efficacy and harms of LTBI treatment regimens aimed at preventing active TB among adults and children.
PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from indexing to 8 May 2017; clinical trial registries; and conference abstracts. No language restrictions were applied.
Randomized controlled trials that evaluated human LTBI treatments and recorded at least 1 of 2 prespecified end points (hepatotoxicity and prevention of active TB).
2 investigators independently extracted data from eligible studies and assessed study quality according to a standard protocol.
The network meta-analysis of 8 new and 53 previously included studies showed that isoniazid regimens of 6 months (odds ratio [OR], 0.65 [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.50 to 0.83]) or 12 to 72 months (OR, 0.50 [CrI, 0.41 to 0.62]), rifampicin-only regimens (OR, 0.41 [CrI, 0.19 to 0.85]), rifampicin-isoniazid regimens of 3 to 4 months (OR, 0.53 [CrI, 0.36 to 0.78]), rifampicin-isoniazid-pyrazinamide regimens (OR, 0.35 [CrI, 0.19 to 0.61]), and rifampicin-pyrazinamide regimens (OR, 0.53 [CrI, 0.33 to 0.84]) were efficacious compared with placebo. Evidence existed for efficacy of weekly rifapentine-isoniazid regimens compared with no treatment (OR, 0.36 [CrI, 0.18 to 0.73]). No conclusive evidence showed that HIV status altered treatment efficacy.
Evidence was sparse for many comparisons and hepatotoxicity outcomes, and risk of bias was high or unknown for many studies.
Evidence exists for the efficacy and safety of 6-month isoniazid monotherapy, rifampicin monotherapy, and combination therapies with 3 to 4 months of isoniazid and rifampicin.
U.K. National Institute for Health Research. (PROSPERO: CRD42016037871).
治疗潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)是结核病(TB)控制的重要组成部分,本研究对之前的 LTBI 最佳治疗方案的网络荟萃分析进行了更新,以告知公共卫生行动和 LTBI 的规划管理。
评估针对成人和儿童的 LTBI 治疗方案预防活动性 TB 的相对疗效和危害。
PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 从索引到 2017 年 5 月 8 日;临床试验登记处;和会议摘要。未应用任何语言限制。
评估人类 LTBI 治疗并记录至少 2 个预定终点之一(肝毒性和预防活动性 TB)的随机对照试验。
2 名调查员根据标准方案独立从合格研究中提取数据并评估研究质量。
对 8 项新研究和 53 项先前纳入的研究进行的网络荟萃分析表明,6 个月异烟肼方案(比值比 [OR],0.65 [95%可信区间 {CrI},0.50 至 0.83])或 12 至 72 个月异烟肼方案(OR,0.50 [CrI,0.41 至 0.62])、利福平单药方案(OR,0.41 [CrI,0.19 至 0.85])、3 至 4 个月利福平-异烟肼方案(OR,0.53 [CrI,0.36 至 0.78])、利福平-异烟肼-吡嗪酰胺方案(OR,0.35 [CrI,0.19 至 0.61])和利福平-吡嗪酰胺方案(OR,0.53 [CrI,0.33 至 0.84])与安慰剂相比是有效的。与无治疗相比,每周利福喷丁-异烟肼方案具有疗效的证据(OR,0.36 [CrI,0.18 至 0.73])。没有确凿的证据表明 HIV 状况改变了治疗效果。
许多比较和肝毒性结果的证据稀少,许多研究的偏倚风险高或未知。
6 个月异烟肼单药治疗、利福平单药治疗以及包含 3 至 4 个月异烟肼和利福平的联合治疗具有疗效和安全性。
英国国家卫生研究院。(PROSPERO:CRD42016037871)。