Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Sciences (KBM), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), 1432, Ås, Norway.
Department of Arctic Technology (AT), University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), 9176, Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(33):33001-33013. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9726-6. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
A first review on occurrence and distribution of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) is presented. The literature survey conducted here was initiated by the current Assessment of the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). This first review on the occurrence and environmental profile of PPCPs in the Arctic identified the presence of 110 related substances in the Arctic environment based on the reports from scientific publications, national and regional assessments and surveys, as well as academic research studies (i.e., PhD theses). PPCP residues were reported in virtually all environmental compartments from coastal seawater to high trophic level biota. For Arctic environments, domestic and municipal wastes as well as sewage are identified as primary release sources. However, the absence of modern waste water treatment plants (WWTPs), even in larger settlements in the Arctic, is resulting in relatively high release rates for selected PPCPs into the receiving Arctic (mainly) aquatic environment. Pharmaceuticals are designed with specific biochemical functions as a part of an integrated therapeutically procedure. This biochemical effect may cause unwanted environmental toxicological effects on non-target organisms when the compound is released into the environment. In the Arctic environments, pharmaceutical residues are released into low to very low ambient temperatures mainly into aqueous environments. Low biodegradability and, thus, prolonged residence time must be expected for the majority of the pharmaceuticals entering the aquatic system. The environmental toxicological consequence of the continuous PPCP release is, thus, expected to be different in the Arctic compared to the temperate regions of the globe. Exposure risks for Arctic human populations due to consumption of contaminated local fish and invertebrates or through exposure to resistant microbial communities cannot be excluded. However, the scientific results reported and summarized here, published in 23 relevant papers and reports (see Table S1 and following references), must still be considered as indication only. Comprehensive environmental studies on the fate, environmental toxicology, and distribution profiles of pharmaceuticals applied in high volumes and released into the Nordic environment under cold Northern climate conditions should be given high priority by national and international authorities.
现呈现一份关于药品和个人护理产品(PPCPs)的出现和分布的首次综述。该文献综述由北极监测和评估方案(AMAP)当前的评估工作发起。此次关于北极地区 PPCPs 的出现和环境状况的首次综述,根据来自科学出版物、国家和区域评估和调查以及学术研究报告(即博士论文)的报告,确定了 110 种相关物质在北极环境中的存在。在几乎所有的环境介质中都检测到了 PPCP 残留,从沿海水域到高营养级生物群。对于北极环境,家庭和城市废物以及污水被确定为主要的释放源。然而,即使在北极的较大定居点,也缺乏现代污水处理厂(WWTP),这导致选定的 PPCP 以相对较高的速率释放到接收的北极(主要是)水生环境中。药品是作为综合治疗程序的一部分,具有特定的生化功能而设计的。当化合物释放到环境中时,这种生化效应可能会对非目标生物产生不必要的环境毒理学影响。在北极环境中,药品残留释放到低温到极低的环境温度中,主要进入水相环境。进入水生系统的大多数药物的生物降解性低,因此预期停留时间延长。因此,与全球温带地区相比,PPCP 持续释放的环境毒理学后果预计会有所不同。由于食用受污染的当地鱼类和无脊椎动物或暴露于耐药微生物群落,北极地区的人类可能面临暴露风险。然而,这里报告和总结的科学结果,发表在 23 篇相关论文和报告中(见表 S1 和以下参考文献),仍然只能作为指示。国家和国际当局应高度优先考虑在寒冷的北方气候条件下,在北欧环境中大量应用并释放的药品的命运、环境毒理学和分布特征的综合环境研究。