Suppr超能文献

阿达木单抗与司库奇尤单抗治疗银屑病关节炎的比较疗效:匹配调整间接比较

Comparative Effectiveness of Adalimumab versus Secukinumab for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.

作者信息

Strand Vibeke, Betts Keith A, Mittal Manish, Song Jinlin, Skup Martha, Joshi Avani

机构信息

Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Analysis Group, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Rheumatol Ther. 2017 Dec;4(2):349-362. doi: 10.1007/s40744-017-0070-6. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Phase III FUTURE I and II trials demonstrated the clinical efficacy of secukinumab in active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In the absence of head-to-head trials, this study compared the clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of adalimumab 40 mg versus secukinumab 150 and 300 mg for the treatment of active PsA.

METHODS

A matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted using individual patient data from the ADEPT trial of adalimumab and published data from FUTURE I and II. To adjust for the cross-trial differences, individual patients in ADEPT were re-weighted so that the mean baseline characteristics (including age, weight, gender, race, baseline methotrexate use, psoriasis ≥3% body surface area, baseline PASI score, presence of dactylitis and enthesitis, and HAQ-DI) matched those in the FUTURE trials. Response rates relative to placebo and incremental costs per responder (CPR) over 24 weeks for ACR 20/50/70 and PASI 75/90 were compared between adalimumab and secukinumab 150 and 300 mg from the German social health insurance (SHI) perspective.

RESULTS

After matching, mean baseline characteristics were balanced across the ADEPT and the FUTURE I and II populations. The mean differences between adalimumab and secukinumab 150 mg in relative ACR 20/50/70 and PASI 75/90 response rates were 9.5, 3.0, 6.0, 13.1, and 6.7%, respectively (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Post-match relative ACR 20/50/70 and PASI 75 to placebo were also higher with adalimumab compared to secukinumab 300 mg. Adalimumab had lower incremental costs per responder over 24 weeks for all outcomes compared with secukinumab 150 and 300 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of direct comparisons between adalimumab and secukinumab, this study provides valuable and reliable evidence for physicians and payers. After adjusting for cross-trial differences in baseline characteristics, adalimumab was associated with higher relative ACR and PASI rates and lower incremental CPRs compared with secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg at week 24 among patients with active PsA.

FUNDING

AbbVie.

摘要

引言

III期FUTURE I和II试验证明了司库奇尤单抗在活动性银屑病关节炎(PsA)中的临床疗效。在缺乏头对头试验的情况下,本研究比较了阿达木单抗40mg与司库奇尤单抗150mg和300mg治疗活动性PsA的临床疗效和成本效益。

方法

使用阿达木单抗ADEPT试验的个体患者数据以及FUTURE I和II的已发表数据进行匹配调整间接比较。为了调整试验间差异,对ADEPT中的个体患者进行重新加权,以使平均基线特征(包括年龄、体重、性别、种族、基线甲氨蝶呤使用情况、银屑病体表面积≥3%、基线银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)评分、指(趾)炎和附着点炎的存在情况以及健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI))与FUTURE试验中的特征相匹配。从德国社会医疗保险(SHI)的角度比较了阿达木单抗与司库奇尤单抗150mg和300mg相对于安慰剂的缓解率以及24周内每个缓解者的增量成本(CPR),用于美国风湿病学会(ACR)20/50/70和PASI 75/90。

结果

匹配后,ADEPT与FUTURE I和II人群的平均基线特征达到平衡。阿达木单抗与司库奇尤单抗150mg在相对ACR 20/50/70和PASI 75/90缓解率方面的平均差异分别为9.5%、3.0%、6.0%、13.1%和6.7%(所有比较p>0.05)。与司库奇尤单抗300mg相比,阿达木单抗与安慰剂相比的匹配后相对ACR 20/50/70和PASI 75也更高。与司库奇尤单抗150mg和300mg相比,阿达木单抗在所有结局的24周内每个缓解者的增量成本更低。

结论

在阿达木单抗和司库奇尤单抗之间缺乏直接比较的情况下,本研究为医生和支付方提供了有价值且可靠的证据。在调整基线特征的试验间差异后,与活动性PsA患者在第24周时的司库奇尤单抗分别为150mg或300mg相比,阿达木单抗的相对ACR和PASI率更高,增量CPR更低。

资助

艾伯维公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验