• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MRI-TRUS 融合与系统活检检测前列腺癌率的变化:学习曲线的证据。

Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve.

机构信息

Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Dec;20(4):436-441. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2017.34. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1038/pcan.2017.34
PMID:28762373
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8170829/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine the effect of urologist and radiologist learning curves and changes in MRI-TRUS fusion platform during 9 years of NCI's experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)/TRUS fusion biopsy.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing mpMRI followed by fusion biopsy (Fbx) and systematic biopsy (Sbx) from 2007 to 2016 was reviewed. The patients were stratified based on the timing of first biopsy. Cohort 1 (7/2007-12/2010) accounted for learning curve. Cohort 2 (1/2011-5/2013) and cohort 3 (5/2013-4/2016) included patients biopsied prior to and after debut of a new software platform, respectively. Clinically significant (CS) disease was defined as Gleason 7 (3+4) or higher. McNemar's test compared cancer detection rates (CDRs) of Sbx and Fbx between time periods.

RESULTS

1528 patients were included in the study with 230, 537 and 761 patients included in three respective cohorts. Median age (interquartile range) was 61.0 (±9.0), 62.0 (±7.3), and 64.0 (±11.0) years in three cohorts, respectively (P<0.001). Fbx and Sbx had comparable CS CDR in cohort 1 (24.8 vs 22.2%, P=0.377). Fbx detected significantly more CS disease compared to Sbx in the following two periods (cohort 2: 31.5 vs 25.0%, P=0.001; cohort 3: 36.4 vs 30.3%, P<0.001) and detected significantly less low risk disease in the same period (cohort 2: 14.5 vs 19.6%, P<0.001; cohort 3: 12.6 vs 16.7%, P<0.001). Even after multivariate adjustment with age, PSA, race, clinical stage and MRI suspicion score, Fbx CS cancer detection increased in successive cohorts (cohort 2: OR 2.23, P=0.043; cohort 3: OR 2.92, P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In the past 9 years, there has been significant improvement in the accuracy of Fbx. Our results show that after an early learning period, Fbx detected higher rates of CS cancer and lower rates of clinically insignificant cancer than Sbx. Software advances allowed for even greater detection of CS disease.

摘要

背景

为了确定泌尿科医生和放射科医生在 NCI 进行多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)/TRUS 融合活检 9 年期间的学习曲线和 MRI-TRUS 融合平台变化的影响。

方法

回顾了 2007 年至 2016 年期间接受 mpMRI 后行融合活检(Fbx)和系统活检(Sbx)的患者的前瞻性维护数据库。根据首次活检的时间对患者进行分层。队列 1(2007 年 7 月至 2010 年 12 月)代表学习曲线。队列 2(2011 年 1 月至 2013 年 5 月)和队列 3(2013 年 5 月至 2016 年 4 月)分别包括在新软件平台推出前和推出后接受活检的患者。临床显著(CS)疾病定义为 Gleason 7(3+4)或更高。McNemar 检验比较了不同时间段 Sbx 和 Fbx 的癌症检出率(CDR)。

结果

本研究共纳入 1528 例患者,分别有 230、537 和 761 例患者纳入三个相应队列。三个队列的中位年龄(四分位间距)分别为 61.0(±9.0)、62.0(±7.3)和 64.0(±11.0)岁(P<0.001)。在队列 1 中,Fbx 和 Sbx 的 CS CDR 具有可比性(24.8% vs 22.2%,P=0.377)。在随后的两个时期,Fbx 检测到的 CS 疾病明显多于 Sbx(队列 2:31.5% vs 25.0%,P=0.001;队列 3:36.4% vs 30.3%,P<0.001),而同一时期检测到的低风险疾病明显减少(队列 2:14.5% vs 19.6%,P<0.001;队列 3:12.6% vs 16.7%,P<0.001)。即使在年龄、PSA、种族、临床分期和 MRI 可疑评分的多变量调整后,Fbx 的 CS 癌症检出率在连续队列中仍有所增加(队列 2:OR 2.23,P=0.043;队列 3:OR 2.92,P=0.007)。

结论

在过去的 9 年中,Fbx 的准确性有了显著提高。我们的结果表明,在早期学习阶段之后,Fbx 检测到的 CS 癌症的比例更高,而临床意义不大的癌症的比例更低。软件的进步使得 CS 疾病的检测率更高。

相似文献

1
Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve.MRI-TRUS 融合与系统活检检测前列腺癌率的变化:学习曲线的证据。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Dec;20(4):436-441. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2017.34. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
2
Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis.对于既往系统活检结果为阴性的患者,融合前列腺活检的表现优于12针系统前列腺活检:一项多机构分析。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Jul;36(7):341.e1-341.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 May 10.
3
Midline lesions of the prostate: role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy and implications in Gleason risk stratification.前列腺中线病变:MRI/TRUS融合活检的作用及其在 Gleason 风险分层中的意义
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Sep;48(9):1445-52. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1336-6. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
4
A Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between Template Systematic Biopsies Obtained Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Machine and Freehand Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsies.MRI-超声融合引导模板系统性前列腺穿刺活检与经直肠超声引导徒手系统性前列腺穿刺活检的前列腺癌检出率比较
J Endourol. 2020 Oct;34(10):1095-1098. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0299. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
5
The prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator 2.0 performs equally for standard biopsy and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.前列腺癌预防试验风险计算器2.0在标准活检和MRI/超声融合引导活检中的表现相同。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Jun;20(2):179-185. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.46. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
6
Multiparametric MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy decreases detection of indolent cancer in African-American men.多参数 MRI/超声融合引导活检可降低非裔美国男性惰性癌的检出率。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Sep;20(3):348-351. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2017.21. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
7
Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.多参数 MRI 提高经直肠超声引导前列腺活检单独诊断前列腺癌的检出率:PROMIS 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jul;22(39):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta22390.
8
Patient Experience of Systematic Versus Fusion Prostate Biopsies.患者对系统前列腺活检与融合前列腺活检的体验。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Aug;1(3):202-207. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 May 15.
9
Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.在未经前列腺活检的患者中进行前列腺癌风险评估:多参数磁共振成像-经直肠超声(TRUS)融合活检和系统 TRUS 活检中的鹿特丹前列腺癌风险计算器。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;1(2):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.在多参数磁共振成像上具有临床显著意义的前列腺癌患者中检测 Gleason 6 前列腺癌。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;73(1):105-111. doi: 10.3233/CH-199223.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspective transition from transrectal to transperineal MRI-fusion biopsy under local anesthesia - the institutional TREXIT learning curve of the new gold standard.局部麻醉下经直肠至经会阴MRI融合活检的视角转变——新金标准的机构性TREXIT学习曲线
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-00992-7.
2
Meeting Cancer Detection Benchmarks in MRI/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis of Experienced Urologists.在前列腺癌的MRI/超声融合活检中达到癌症检测基准:来自经验丰富的泌尿科医生的回顾性分析见解
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 16;17(2):277. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020277.
3

本文引用的文献

1
PI-RADSv2: How we do it.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版:我们的操作方法。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jul;46(1):11-23. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25645. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
2
The Learning Curve in Prostate MRI Interpretation: Self-Directed Learning Versus Continual Reader Feedback.前列腺MRI解读中的学习曲线:自主学习与持续读者反馈
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar;208(3):W92-W100. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16876. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
3
The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.USPSTF PSA 筛查推荐对美国前列腺癌发病模式的影响。
Comparison of systematic and combined biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer.
系统和联合活检在前列腺癌检测中的比较。
Asian J Androl. 2024 Sep 1;26(5):517-521. doi: 10.4103/aja202412. Epub 2024 May 14.
4
The learning curve for robotic-assisted transperineal MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy.机器人辅助经会阴 MRI/US 融合引导前列腺活检的学习曲线。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5638. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55492-w.
5
Learning curve for magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in detecting prostate cancer using cumulative sum analysis.使用累积和分析的磁共振成像/超声融合前列腺活检在检测前列腺癌中的学习曲线
Curr Urol. 2023 Sep;17(3):159-164. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000116. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
6
A Systematic Review of the Current Status of Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Images Fusion Software Platforms for Transperineal Prostate Biopsies.经会阴前列腺穿刺活检磁共振-超声图像融合软件平台现状的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 24;15(13):3329. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133329.
7
Learning Curve of Transperineal MRI/US Fusion Prostate Biopsy: 4-Year Experience.经会阴MRI/超声融合前列腺穿刺活检的学习曲线:4年经验
Life (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;13(3):638. doi: 10.3390/life13030638.
8
A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies.基于半机器人软件的 MRI/TRUS 融合靶向前列腺活检中操作者间变异性的前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Feb;40(2):427-433. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03891-3. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
9
Multiparametric ultrasound and micro-ultrasound in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.多参数超声和微超声在前列腺癌中的应用:全面综述。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Mar 1;95(1131):20210633. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210633. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
10
Analyzing the learning curves of a novice and an experienced urologist for transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.分析新手和经验丰富的泌尿科医生进行经直肠磁共振成像-超声融合前列腺活检的学习曲线。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):1956-1965. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-8.
Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Jan;14(1):26-37. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.251. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
4
Learning curve of MRI-based planning for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.基于磁共振成像(MRI)的前列腺癌高剂量率近距离放疗计划的学习曲线
Brachytherapy. 2016 Jul-Aug;15(4):426-434. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 May 21.
5
Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: Improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment.多参数磁共振成像与靶向前列腺活检:癌症检测、定位及风险评估的改进
Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(1):9-18. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.734. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
6
Use of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Achieve Consistent Reporting of Level of Suspicion for Tumor on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.利用质量改进计划实现多参数前列腺MRI上肿瘤怀疑程度的一致报告。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 May;206(5):1040-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15768.
7
The significance of anterior prostate lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in African-American men.非洲裔美国男性前列腺前部病变在多参数磁共振成像中的意义。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Jun;34(6):254.e15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.12.018. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
8
Impact of the US Preventive Services Task Force Grade D Recommendation: Assessment of Evaluations for Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and Prostate Biopsies in a Large Urology Group Practice Following Statement Revision.美国预防服务工作组D级推荐的影响:声明修订后在一个大型泌尿外科团体诊所中对前列腺特异性抗原升高及前列腺活检评估的评价
Rev Urol. 2015;17(3):171-7.
9
Prostate Needle Biopsy Outcomes in the Era of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation against Prostate Specific Antigen Based Screening.美国预防服务工作组建议反对基于前列腺特异性抗原的筛查时代的前列腺穿刺活检结果
J Urol. 2016 Jan;195(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.099. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.MR/超声融合引导活检与超声引导活检诊断前列腺癌的比较。
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):390-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17942.