• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯西部一家初级保健肥胖诊所针对成年人开展的一项为期12周强化生活方式干预项目的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of a 12-week intensive lifestyle intervention program at a primary care obesity clinic for adults in western Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Alghamdi Riyad Q

机构信息

Obesity Control Program, Public Health Administration, Directorate of Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2017 Aug;38(8):837-845. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.8.20553.

DOI:10.15537/smj.2017.8.20553
PMID:28762437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5556301/
Abstract

To assess the ability of a 12-week primary care-based intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI), to facilitate a 5% reduction in baseline weight compared with an education-only active comparator (AC).  Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in a primary health care setting in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia between December 2014 and June 2015. Arab participants with obesity, but who were otherwise healthy (n=140), were randomized to the ILI (n=70) or AC (n=70) group. The ILI group received 8 clinical visits throughout the study. The AC group received only an initial health education session. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who achieved clinically significant weight loss (≥5% of their baseline weight).  Results: Participants in the ILI group were significantly more likely than those in the AC group to achieve the primary outcome (p=0.008, relative risk: 1.8 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15 to 2.93). At week 12, the ILI group exhibited a mean weight decrease of 5.58 ± 5.60 kg (-5.37 ± 5.31%), significantly greater than that observed in the AC group (-2.8 ± 4.96 kg, -2.62 ± 4.34%, p=0.002), and corresponding to a weight loss advantage of 2.77 kg (95% CI: 1.01 to 4.54 kg) or 2.75% (95% CI: 1.13% to 4.37%).  Conclusion: The 12-week primary care-based ILI program was effective in achieving a clinically meaningful weight reduction (≥5%) among Saudi and Arab patients with obesity.

摘要

评估基于初级保健的为期12周的强化生活方式干预(ILI)与仅提供教育的积极对照(AC)相比,促进基线体重降低5%的能力。方法:2014年12月至2015年6月在沙特阿拉伯吉达的一个初级卫生保健机构进行了一项随机临床试验。140名患有肥胖症但其他方面健康的阿拉伯参与者被随机分为ILI组(n = 70)或AC组(n = 70)。ILI组在整个研究过程中接受8次临床访视。AC组仅接受一次初始健康教育课程。主要结局是实现具有临床意义的体重减轻(≥其基线体重的5%)的参与者比例。结果:ILI组参与者实现主要结局的可能性显著高于AC组(p = 0.008,相对风险:1.8 [95%置信区间[CI]:1.15至2.93])。在第12周时,ILI组的平均体重下降了5.58±5.60千克(-5.37±5.31%),显著大于AC组观察到的体重下降(-2.8±4.96千克,-2.62±4.34%,p = 0.002),相当于体重减轻优势为2.77千克(95%CI:1.01至4.54千克)或2.75%(95%CI:1.13%至4.37%)。结论:基于初级保健的为期12周的ILI计划在沙特和阿拉伯肥胖患者中有效实现了具有临床意义的体重减轻(≥5%)。

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of a 12-week intensive lifestyle intervention program at a primary care obesity clinic for adults in western Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯西部一家初级保健肥胖诊所针对成年人开展的一项为期12周强化生活方式干预项目的随机对照试验。
Saudi Med J. 2017 Aug;38(8):837-845. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.8.20553.
2
Effects of a 2-Year Primary Care Lifestyle Intervention on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.为期 2 年的初级保健生活方式干预对心血管代谢危险因素的影响:一项集群随机试验。
Circulation. 2021 Mar 23;143(12):1202-1214. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051328. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
4
Mediators of weight change in underserved patients with obesity: exploratory analyses from the Promoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary Care in Louisiana (PROPEL) cluster-randomized trial.资源匮乏肥胖患者体重变化的调解因素:来自路易斯安那州初级保健中促进成功减肥(PROPEL)集群随机试验的探索性分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Oct 6;116(4):1112-1122. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac179.
5
6
[Intensive lifestyle interventions: are they effective against obesity?].[强化生活方式干预:它们对肥胖有效吗?]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2021 Mar 16;165:D5885.
7
Impact of intensive lifestyle intervention on preference-based quality of life in type 2 diabetes: Results from the Look AHEAD trial.强化生活方式干预对2型糖尿病患者基于偏好的生活质量的影响:Look AHEAD试验结果
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Apr;24(4):856-64. doi: 10.1002/oby.21445. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
8
Early weight-loss success identifies nonresponders after a lifestyle intervention in a worksite diabetes prevention trial.在一项工作场所糖尿病预防试验中,早期体重减轻成功可识别出生活方式干预后的无反应者。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Sep;115(9):1464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
9
Lifestyle intervention in primary care settings improves obesity parameters among Mexican youth.初级保健机构中的生活方式干预可改善墨西哥青少年的肥胖指标。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Feb;110(2):285-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.042.
10
[Improvement of insulin sensitivity after an intensive lifestyle program for youth's weight management in the primary care].[初级保健中强化生活方式干预方案对青少年体重管理及胰岛素敏感性的改善作用]
Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2012 Sep;62(3):258-66.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-promotion interventions targeting multiple behaviors: A meta-analytic review of general and behavior-specific processes of change.促进健康的干预措施针对多种行为:一般和行为特定变化过程的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;150(7):798-838. doi: 10.1037/bul0000427. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Effectiveness of education intervention, with regards to physical activity level and a healthy diet, among Middle Eastern adolescents in Malaysia: A study protocol for a randomized control trial, based on a health belief model.基于健康信念模式的马来西亚中东裔青少年身体活动水平和健康饮食教育干预效果的随机对照试验研究方案
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):e0289937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289937. eCollection 2024.
3
Enhancing Physical and Psychosocial Health of Older Adults in Saudi Arabia through Walking: Comparison between Supervised Group-Based and Non-Supervised Individual-Based Walking.通过步行改善沙特阿拉伯老年人的身体和心理社会健康:基于监督小组的步行与非监督个人步行的比较。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Oct 26;13(11):2342-2357. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13110165.
4
The effects of walking on frailty, cognitive function and quality of life among inactive older adults in Saudi Arabia: a study protocol of randomized control trial by comparing supervised group-based intervention and non-supervised individual-based intervention.沙特阿拉伯不活跃老年人行走对虚弱、认知功能和生活质量的影响:一项比较监督小组干预和非监督个体干预的随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 27;23(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04200-w.
5
Health Coaching for Weight Loss Among Overweight and Obese Individuals in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Analysis.沙特阿拉伯超重和肥胖个体的减肥健康指导:一项回顾性分析
Cureus. 2023 Jul 10;15(7):e41658. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41658. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Comparison of nutrition care services for adult obesity at primary care in two different periods in Saudi Arabia.比较沙特阿拉伯两个不同时期基层医疗保健中成人肥胖的营养护理服务。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jul 21;24(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02094-6.
7
Lifestyle Interventions for Prevention and Management of Diet-Linked Non-Communicable Diseases among Adults in Arab Countries.阿拉伯国家成年人中与饮食相关的非传染性疾病预防和管理的生活方式干预措施。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;11(1):45. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010045.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss in control group participants of lifestyle randomized trials.生活方式随机试验对照组参与者体重减轻的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 18;12(1):12252. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15770-x.
9
Prevalence, risk factors, and interventions for obesity in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review.沙特阿拉伯肥胖的流行率、风险因素和干预措施:系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2022 Jul;23(7):e13448. doi: 10.1111/obr.13448. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
10
Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) Estimation - A Novel Cost-Effective Obesity Indicator for Visceral Adipose Tissue Estimation.内脏脂肪代谢评分(METS-VF)评估——一种用于评估内脏脂肪组织的新型经济有效的肥胖指标。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Sep 16;13:3261-3267. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S266277. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Obesity and public health in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯王国的肥胖与公共卫生
Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(3):191-205. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0008.
2
Comparison of weight loss among named diet programs in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis.在超重和肥胖成年人中,各种指定饮食计划的减肥效果比较:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2014 Sep 3;312(9):923-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10397.
3
Adding evidence-based behavioral weight loss strategies to a statewide wellness campaign: a randomized clinical trial.将基于证据的行为体重管理策略加入全州范围内的健康促进活动中:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jul;104(7):1300-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301870. Epub 2014 May 15.
4
2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society.2013年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/肥胖学会成人超重和肥胖管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组及肥胖学会的报告
Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S102-38. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437739.71477.ee. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
5
Clinical review: modified 5 As: minimal intervention for obesity counseling in primary care.临床综述:改良 5As 法:初级保健中肥胖咨询的最小干预措施。
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Jan;59(1):27-31.
6
Screening for and management of obesity in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.成年人肥胖的筛查与管理:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 4;157(5):373-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00475.
7
t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies--a paradox of statistical practice?t 检验、非参数检验与大型研究——统计实践中的悖论?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 14;12:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-78.
8
Behavioral treatment of obesity.肥胖的行为治疗。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011 Dec;34(4):841-59. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2011.08.006.
9
Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature.减肥干预措施中辍学的预测因素:文献系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2011 Nov;12(11):912-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00915.x. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
10
Comparison of education-only versus group-based intervention in promoting weight loss: a randomised controlled trial.单纯教育与基于小组的干预在促进减肥方面的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obes Facts. 2011;4(3):222-8. doi: 10.1159/000329619. Epub 2011 Jun 9.