Suppr超能文献

荷兰3个月帕利哌酮治疗慢性精神分裂症的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of 3-month paliperidone therapy for chronic schizophrenia in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Einarson Thomas R, Bereza Basil G, Tedouri Fadi, Van Impe Kristel, Denee Tom R, Dries Pieter J T

机构信息

a Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy , University of Toronto , Toronto , ON , Canada.

b Janssen Janssen Pharmaceutica NV , Beerse , Belgium.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2017 Nov;20(11):1187-1199. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1363050. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A new depot formulation of paliperidone has been developed that provides effective treatment for schizophrenia for 3 months (PP3M). It has been tested in phase-3 trials, but no data on its cost-effectiveness have been published.

PURPOSE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of PP3M compared with once-monthly paliperidone (PP1M), haloperidol long-acting therapy (HAL-LAT), risperidone microspheres (RIS-LAT), and oral olanzapine (oral-OLZ) for treating chronic schizophrenia in The Netherlands.

METHODS

A previous 1-year decision tree was adapted, based on local inputs supplemented with data from published literature. The primary analysis used DRG costs in 2016 euros from the insurer perspective, as derived from official lists. A micro-costing analysis was also conducted. For the costing scenario, official list prices were used. Clinical outcomes included relapses (treated as outpatients, requiring hospitalization, total), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Rates and utility scores were derived from the literature. Economic outcomes were the incremental cost/QALY-gained or relapse-avoided. Model robustness was examined in scenario, 1-way, and probability sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The expected cost was lowest with PP3M (8,781€), followed by PP1M (10,325€), HAL-LAT (11,278€), RIS-LAT (11,307€), and oral-OLZ (13,556€). PP3M had the fewest total relapses/patient (0.36, 0.94, 1.39, 1.21, and 1.70, respectively), hospitalizations (0.11, 0.46, 0.40, 0.56, and 0.57, respectively), emergency room visits (0.25, 0.48. 0.99, 0.65, and 1.14, respectively) and the most QALYs (0.847, 0.735, 0.709, 0.719, and 0.656, respectively). In both cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, PP3M dominated all other drugs. Sensitivity analyses confirmed base case findings. In the costing analysis, total costs were, on average, 31.9% higher than DRGs.

CONCLUSIONS

PP3M dominated all commonly used drugs. It is cost-effective for treating chronic schizophrenia in the Netherlands. Results were robust over a wide range of sensitivity analyses. For patients requiring a depot medication, such as those with adherence problems, PP3M appears to be a good alternative anti-psychotic treatment.

摘要

背景

已研发出一种新型长效帕利哌酮制剂,可有效治疗精神分裂症达3个月(PP3M)。该制剂已在3期试验中进行了测试,但尚未发表其成本效益数据。

目的

确定在荷兰,与每月一次的帕利哌酮(PP1M)、长效氟哌啶醇治疗(HAL-LAT)、利培酮微球(RIS-LAT)及口服奥氮平(口服-OLZ)相比,PP3M治疗慢性精神分裂症的成本效益。

方法

基于当地数据并补充已发表文献中的数据,对之前的1年决策树进行了调整。主要分析从保险公司角度使用2016年欧元的疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)成本,数据源自官方列表。还进行了微观成本分析。对于成本计算方案,使用官方标价。临床结局包括复发(作为门诊患者治疗、需要住院治疗、总计)及质量调整生命年(QALY)。发生率和效用评分源自文献。经济结局为增量成本/获得的QALY或避免的复发。在情景分析、单因素分析和概率敏感性分析中检验了模型的稳健性。

结果

PP3M的预期成本最低(8781欧元),其次是PP1M(10325欧元)、HAL-LAT(11278欧元)、RIS-LAT(11307欧元)和口服-OLZ(13556欧元)。PP3M的每位患者总复发数最少(分别为0.36、0.94、1.39、1.21和1.70),住院次数最少(分别为0.11、0.46、0.40、0.56和0.57),急诊就诊次数最少(分别为0.25、0.48、0.99、0.65和1.14),获得的QALY最多(分别为0.847、0.735、0.709、0.719和0.656)。在成本效益分析和成本效用分析中,PP3M均优于所有其他药物。敏感性分析证实了基础病例的结果。在成本分析中,总成本平均比DRG高31.9%。

结论

PP3M优于所有常用药物。在荷兰,其治疗慢性精神分裂症具有成本效益。在广泛的敏感性分析中,结果均很稳健。对于需要长效药物治疗的患者,如存在依从性问题的患者,PP3M似乎是一种很好的抗精神病替代治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验