• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症药物经济学评价中效用值的系统评价:对成本效益结果的影响

Systematic review of utility values used in the pharmacoeconomic evaluations for schizophrenia: implications on cost-effectiveness results.

作者信息

Zhou Junwen, Millier Aurélie, François Clément, Aballéa Samuel, Toumi Mondher

机构信息

Public Health Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Health Economic and Outcome Research Department, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Aug 22;7(1):1648973. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1648973. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1080/20016689.2019.1648973
PMID:31489150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6713214/
Abstract

: Utility elicitation studies for schizophrenia generate different utility values for the same health states. We reviewed utility values used in schizophrenia pharmacoeconomic evaluations and evaluated the impact of their selection on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). : A systematic search was performed in Medline and Embase. Health state definitions, associated utility values, elicitation studies, and value selection processes were extracted. Sets of utility values for all schizophrenia health states were used in a cost-effectiveness model to evaluate the ICER. : Thirty-five cost-utility analyses (CUAs) referring to 11 utility elicitation studies were included. The most frequent health states were 'stable' (28 CUAs, 7 utility elicitation studies, 10 values, value range 0.650-0.919), 'relapse requiring hospitalisation' (18, 5, 7, 0.270-0.604), 'relapse not requiring hospitalisation' (18, 5, 10, 0.460-0.762), and 'relapse only' (10, 5, 6, 0.498-0.700). Seventeen sets of utility values were identified with difference in utility values between relapse and stable ranging from -0.358 to -0.050, resulting in ICERs ranging from -56.2% to +222.6% from average. : The use of utility values for schizophrenia health states differs among CUAs and impacts on the ICER. More rigorous and transparent use of utility values and sensitivity analysis with different sets of utility values are suggested for future CUAs.

摘要

针对精神分裂症的效用诱导研究针对相同的健康状态产生了不同的效用值。我们回顾了精神分裂症药物经济学评估中使用的效用值,并评估了其选择对增量成本效益比(ICER)的影响。:在Medline和Embase中进行了系统检索。提取了健康状态定义、相关效用值、诱导研究和值选择过程。在成本效益模型中使用所有精神分裂症健康状态的效用值集来评估ICER。:纳入了35项成本效用分析(CUA),涉及11项效用诱导研究。最常见的健康状态是“稳定”(28项CUA、7项效用诱导研究、10个值,值范围为0.650 - 0.919)、“需要住院治疗的复发”(18项、5项、7项、0.270 - 0.604)、“不需要住院治疗的复发”(18项、5项、10项、0.460 - 0.762)和“仅复发”(10项、5项、6项、0.498 - 0.700)。确定了17组效用值,复发与稳定状态之间效用值的差异范围为 - 0.358至 - 0.050,导致ICER平均范围为 - 56.2%至 + 222.6%。:CUA之间用于精神分裂症健康状态的效用值使用情况不同,且对ICER有影响。建议未来的CUA更严格、透明地使用效用值,并对不同的效用值集进行敏感性分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962a/6713214/dd20ef125463/ZJMA_A_1648973_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962a/6713214/02834cbdc214/ZJMA_A_1648973_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962a/6713214/dd20ef125463/ZJMA_A_1648973_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962a/6713214/02834cbdc214/ZJMA_A_1648973_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962a/6713214/dd20ef125463/ZJMA_A_1648973_F0002_B.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review of utility values used in the pharmacoeconomic evaluations for schizophrenia: implications on cost-effectiveness results.精神分裂症药物经济学评价中效用值的系统评价:对成本效益结果的影响
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Aug 22;7(1):1648973. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1648973. eCollection 2019.
2
Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values Used in European Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations for Chronic Hepatitis C: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Results.系统评价在欧洲慢性丙型肝炎药物经济学评价中使用的健康状态效用值:对成本效益结果的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):29-44. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00600-w.
3
The cost effectiveness of long-acting/extended-release antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review of economic evaluations.长效/缓释抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症的成本效益:经济评价的系统评价。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Apr;11(2):95-106. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0016-2.
4
[Comparison of medical and economic benefits of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia in France].[法国抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的医学与经济效益比较]
Encephale. 2017 Aug;43(4):311-320. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
5
How reliable are ICER's results published in current pharmacoeconomic literature? The controversial issue of price confidentiality.当前药物经济学文献中发表的增量成本效果比(ICER)结果有多可靠?价格保密这一有争议的问题。
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb 25;9:31-35. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2022.2350. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Monoclonal antibody for reducing the risk of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children.用于降低儿童呼吸道合胞病毒感染风险的单克隆抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD006602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006602.pub4.
7
Cost Effectiveness of Paliperidone Long-Acting Injectable Versus Other Antipsychotics for the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia in France.在法国,帕利哌酮长效注射剂与其他抗精神病药物用于精神分裂症维持治疗的成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):363-91. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0348-x.
8
Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia.精神分裂症药物经济学模型的系统评价
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2018 Aug 14;6(1):1508272. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1508272. eCollection 2018.
9
Family Spillover Effects in Pediatric Cost-Utility Analyses.儿科成本效用分析中的家庭溢出效应。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Apr;17(2):163-174. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0436-0.
10
The cost-effectiveness of biologics for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.生物制剂治疗类风湿关节炎的成本效益:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0119683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119683. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of ten commonly used antipsychotics in first-episode schizophrenia in the UK: economic evaluation based on a discrete event simulation model.英国10种常用抗精神病药物治疗首发精神分裂症的成本效益:基于离散事件模拟模型的经济学评估
Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Aug;227(2):545-552. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.251.
2
Cost-effectiveness of interferon- release assay for screening of latent tuberculosis infection in individuals with schizophrenia.干扰素释放试验在精神分裂症个体中筛查潜伏性结核感染的成本效益。
Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Jan 5;152:e13. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823002030.
3
The PSY-SIM Model: Using Real-World Data to Inform Health Care Policy for Individuals With Chronic Psychotic Disorders.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of health state utility estimates from instrument-based and vignette-based methods: a case study in kidney disease.基于工具法和基于 vignette 法的健康状态效用估计值比较:以肾脏疾病为例的研究
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jul 8;12(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4413-y.
2
Toward a Centralized, Systematic Approach to the Identification, Appraisal, and Use of Health State Utility Values for Reimbursement Decision Making: Introducing the Health Utility Book (HUB).迈向以集中、系统的方法识别、评估和使用健康状态效用值来进行报销决策:引入健康效用手册 (HUB)。
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):370-378. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19837969. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
PSY-SIM 模型:利用真实世界数据为慢性精神病患者的医疗保健政策提供信息。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Aug 27;50(5):1094-1103. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad175.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of monthly, 3-monthly, and 6-monthly long-acting injectable and oral paliperidone in adults with schizophrenia.长效注射和口服帕利哌酮每月、每 3 个月和每 6 个月治疗成人精神分裂症的成本效益分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Aug;29(8):884-895. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.8.884.
5
Evaluation of EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) Designs to Generate National Value Sets: Learnings from the Development of an EQ-5D Value Set for India Using an Extended Design (DEVINE) Study.评估欧洲质量生活五维度量表价值评估技术(EQ-VT)设计以生成国家价值集:使用扩展设计(DEVINE)研究开发印度 EQ-5D 价值集的经验教训。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Aug;43(6):692-703. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231180134. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
6
"Cost-effectiveness of ACL treatment is dependent on age and activity level: a systematic review".“ACL 治疗的成本效益取决于年龄和活动水平:系统评价”。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Feb;31(2):530-541. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07087-z. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
7
Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values Used in European Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations for Chronic Hepatitis C: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Results.系统评价在欧洲慢性丙型肝炎药物经济学评价中使用的健康状态效用值:对成本效益结果的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):29-44. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00600-w.
Relapse prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis of brexpiprazole treatment in adult patients with schizophrenia in the USA.
复发预防:美国成年精神分裂症患者使用布瑞哌唑治疗的成本效益分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Aug 16;10:443-456. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S160252. eCollection 2018.
4
Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia.精神分裂症药物经济学模型的系统评价
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2018 Aug 14;6(1):1508272. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1508272. eCollection 2018.
5
Cost-Utility Analysis of Depot Atypical Antipsychotics for Chronic Schizophrenia in Croatia.克罗地亚长效非典型抗精神病药物治疗慢性精神分裂症的成本效用分析。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2013 Sep-Oct;2(2):181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Sertindole among Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia in South Korea.在韩国,舍吲哚在非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症中的成本效益分析
Value Health Reg Issues. 2012 May;1(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.015. Epub 2012 May 25.
7
A systematic review of health economic models and utility estimation methods in schizophrenia.精神分裂症健康经济模型与效用估计方法的系统评价
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Jun;18(3):267-275. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1430571. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
8
Economic evaluation of paliperidone palmitate once monthly for treating chronic schizophrenia patients in the United Arab Emirates.棕榈酸帕利哌酮每月一次治疗阿联酋慢性精神分裂症患者的经济学评价
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Apr;34(4):601-611. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1417246. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
Cost-effectiveness of 3-month paliperidone therapy for chronic schizophrenia in the Netherlands.荷兰3个月帕利哌酮治疗慢性精神分裂症的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2017 Nov;20(11):1187-1199. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1363050. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
10
Cost-effectiveness of 3-month paliperidone treatment for chronic schizophrenia in Spain.3个月帕利哌酮治疗西班牙慢性精神分裂症的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2017 Oct;20(10):1039-1047. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1351370. Epub 2017 Jul 13.