Raposio Edoardo, Bertozzi Nicolò, Moretti Rebecca, Grignaffini Eugenio, Grieco Michele P
Wounds. 2017 Jul;29(7):190-195. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) and transcutaneous oximetry (TcpO2) are established methods for investigating cutaneous perfusion. To date, no study previously performed has compared data obtained from these 2 methodologies in cases of chronic cutaneous ulcers.
Laser Doppler Flowmetry and TcpO2 were performed in 25 consecutive outpatients with chronic lower limb ulcers (group A, experimental; 9 women and 16 men; mean age 67 years [range, 52-81 years]) and 25 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects (group B, control) enrolled for the study. Ulcer aetiologies included 12 peripheral arterial occlusive disease, 9 chronic venous insufficiencies, and 4 pressure ulcers. Data were analyzed with Shapiro-Wilk and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests.
A statistically significant difference (P < .05) was found between LDF values of the 2 groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups regarding the TcpO2 measurements.
The data confirmed the soundness of LDF while investigating local perfusion in patients with chronic cutaneous ulcers. The same diagnostic accuracy was not obtained by means of TcpO2.
引言/目的:激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)和经皮血氧饱和度测定法(TcpO2)是用于研究皮肤灌注的既定方法。迄今为止,之前尚未有研究在慢性皮肤溃疡病例中比较过从这两种方法获得的数据。
对25例连续性门诊慢性下肢溃疡患者(A组,实验组;9名女性和16名男性;平均年龄67岁[范围52 - 81岁])和25名年龄及性别匹配的健康对照受试者(B组,对照组)进行了激光多普勒血流仪和经皮血氧饱和度测定法检测。溃疡病因包括12例外周动脉闭塞性疾病、9例慢性静脉功能不全和4例压疮。数据采用夏皮罗 - 威尔克检验和威尔科克森 - 曼 - 惠特尼检验进行分析。
两组的LDF值之间存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.05)。两组在TcpO2测量方面未发现统计学显著差异。
数据证实了LDF在研究慢性皮肤溃疡患者局部灌注时的可靠性。通过TcpO2未获得相同的诊断准确性。