Jain Dharmendra, Nigam Pradeep, Indurkar Manoj, Chiramkara Riyas
Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, SS Medical College and SGM Hospital, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):OM01-OM04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/29194.10138. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Mechanism of a regular, monomorphic Wide QRS Complex Tachycardia (WCT) is an important diagnostic challenge in day to day practice for the clinicians and affects further management and prognosis. Many of the WCT and Narrow Complex Tachycardia (NCT) produce certain characteristic changes in lead aVR by which we can differentiate between them.
The present study was aimed to evaluate tachyarrhythmias in relation to lead aVR and to highlight the clinical significance of lead aVR, "The Neglected Lead".
This is prospective study in which 55 consecutive cases of tachyarrhythmias excluding sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter were taken for the study admitted in from ICCU of Department of Medicine at S.S. Medical College and S.G.M. Hospital Rewa (M.P.), India, during July 2014 to September 2015, fulfilling the required study protocol. The data was collected regarding detailed history, physical examination; necessary investigations (including ECG and echocardiography) were done.
Among 55 patients, 30 were of WCT and 25 were of NCT. The most common cause of WCT was Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) (83.3%) and rest were Supra Ventricular Tachycardia (SVT) with aberrancy (16.7%). The most common cause of NCT was Atrioventricular Nodal Tachycardia (AVNRT) (84%) followed by Atrioventricular Reciprocating Tachycardia (AVRT) (16%). The present study observed that 38.1% of the AVNRT cases and 50% of AVRT cases showed positive 'p' wave in lead aVR. The present study observed that 75% cases of AVRT showed ST segment elevation in lead aVR while only 33.3% cases of AVNRT showed ST elevation. In the present study 80% of the patients with WCT were diagnosed to have VT using Brugada algorithm while using Vereckei's new aVR algorithm, 83.3% were diagnosed to have VT.
Lead aVR, one of the most neglected leads on 12 lead ECG, is a very important diagnostic tool for identification and categorization of different type of tachyarrhythmias. The presence of ST elevation in lead aVR on ECG showing NCT is relatively sensitive for diagnosing AVRT. New aVR algorithm by Vereckei is more sensitive for differential diagnosis of WCT. One should pay careful attention to lead aVR which provides essential diagnostic information.
规则的单形性宽QRS波群心动过速(WCT)的机制是临床医生日常实践中的一项重要诊断挑战,会影响进一步的治疗和预后。许多WCT和窄QRS波群心动过速(NCT)在aVR导联会产生某些特征性变化,借此我们可以对它们进行鉴别。
本研究旨在评估与aVR导联相关的快速性心律失常,并强调被忽视的导联aVR的临床意义。
这是一项前瞻性研究,选取了印度中央邦瑞瓦市S.S.医学院和S.G.M.医院内科重症监护病房(ICCU)收治的55例连续的快速性心律失常患者(不包括窦性心动过速、心房颤动和心房扑动)进行研究,时间为2014年7月至2015年9月,符合所需的研究方案。收集了详细的病史、体格检查数据;进行了必要的检查(包括心电图和超声心动图)。
55例患者中,30例为WCT,25例为NCT。WCT最常见的病因是室性心动过速(VT)(83.3%),其余为伴有差异性传导的室上性心动过速(SVT)(16.7%)。NCT最常见的病因是房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)(84%),其次是房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)(16%)。本研究观察到,38.1%的AVNRT病例和50%的AVRT病例在aVR导联显示正向“P”波。本研究观察到,75%的AVRT病例在aVR导联显示ST段抬高,而只有33.3%的AVNRT病例显示ST段抬高。在本研究中,使用Brugada算法,80%的WCT患者被诊断为VT,而使用Vereckei的新aVR算法,83.3%被诊断为VT。
aVR导联是12导联心电图中最易被忽视的导联之一,是识别和分类不同类型快速性心律失常的非常重要的诊断工具。心电图显示NCT时,aVR导联ST段抬高对诊断AVRT相对敏感。Vereckei的新aVR算法对WCT的鉴别诊断更敏感。应仔细关注aVR导联,它能提供重要的诊断信息。