• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜经鼻颅底肿瘤切除术并发术中脑脊液漏的重建效果。

Reconstructive outcome of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal surgery for tumors involving skull base.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery Clinic, Brain Tumor Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Nov;45:227-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2017.07.012
PMID:28765065
Abstract

Endoscopic transnasal surgery for tumors located at the base of the skull has a high incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Here, we assessed the repair outcomes for high-flow CSF leaks based upon the tumor location, and analyzed the reasons for repair failure after transnasal endoscopic surgery solely for tumors involving the base of the skull. From Feb. 2009 to Dec. 2014 we performed endoscopic endonasal surgery for a variety of skull base lesions in 788 patients at our institution. Among them, 95 patients with intradural skull base tumors underwent endoscopic transnasal surgery. We performed surgical repairs with a multilayered nonvascularized construct (38 patients) and a vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap construct combined with a fascia graft (57 patients). Overall, 14 of 95 patients (14.7%) who underwent endoscopic transnasal surgery for skull base tumors developed postoperative CSF leaks. The major causes of repair failure included graft disruption by a lack of counter-pressure in the multilayered non-vascularized technique, and inadequate drilling of the sphenoid bone, displacement of the flap due to pressure from CSF or gravity, or disruption of flap integrity in the vascularized pedicled flap technique. Logistic regression analysis revealed that there was no significant association between repair failure and age, sex, type of reconstructive method used, and primary tumor type (p>0.05). Reconstruction after endoscopic endonasal surgery remained challenging, especially for non-pituitary skull base tumors requiring intra-arachnoidal dissection. Recent advances in reconstructive techniques require the accumulation of experiences with sufficient dexterity to achieve an acceptable morbidity rate.

摘要

内镜经鼻手术治疗颅底肿瘤术后脑脊液(CSF)漏发生率较高。在此,我们根据肿瘤位置评估了高流量 CSF 漏的修复效果,并分析了单纯内镜经鼻手术治疗颅底肿瘤后修复失败的原因。2009 年 2 月至 2014 年 12 月,我们在我院对 788 例颅底病变患者进行了各种内镜经鼻手术。其中,95 例硬脑膜内颅底肿瘤患者接受了内镜经鼻手术。我们采用多层非血管化结构(38 例)和血管化带蒂鼻中隔瓣结构联合筋膜移植(57 例)进行手术修复。总的来说,95 例行内镜经鼻手术治疗颅底肿瘤的患者中有 14 例(14.7%)发生术后 CSF 漏。修复失败的主要原因包括多层非血管化技术中缺乏对抗压力导致移植物破裂、蝶骨钻孔不足、由于 CSF 或重力的压力导致皮瓣移位、或血管化带蒂皮瓣技术中皮瓣完整性受损。Logistic 回归分析显示,修复失败与年龄、性别、使用的重建方法类型以及原发性肿瘤类型之间无显著相关性(p>0.05)。内镜经鼻手术后的重建仍然具有挑战性,尤其是对于需要蛛网膜下腔解剖的非垂体颅底肿瘤。最近重建技术的进步需要积累足够的经验和灵巧性,以达到可接受的发病率。

相似文献

1
Reconstructive outcome of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal surgery for tumors involving skull base.内镜经鼻颅底肿瘤切除术并发术中脑脊液漏的重建效果。
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Nov;45:227-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
2
Radiographic enhancement of the nasoseptal flap does not predict postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks in endoscopic skull base reconstruction.鼻内隔瓣的影像学增强并不预示内镜颅底重建术后的脑脊液漏。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Jun;122(6):1226-34. doi: 10.1002/lary.23351. Epub 2012 May 7.
3
Evolution of the graded repair of CSF leaks and skull base defects in endonasal endoscopic tumor surgery: trends in repair failure and meningitis rates in 509 patients.经鼻内镜肿瘤手术中脑脊液漏和颅底缺损的分级修复演变:509 例患者中修复失败和脑膜炎发生率的趋势。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Mar 1;130(3):861-875. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.JNS172141. Epub 2018 May 11.
4
Efficacy of the pedicled nasoseptal flap without cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion for repair of skull base defects: incidence of postoperative CSF leaks.带蒂鼻中隔-鼻黏膜瓣修复颅底缺损而不进行脑脊液(CSF)转流的疗效:术后脑脊液漏的发生率。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012 Sep-Oct;2(5):397-401. doi: 10.1002/alr.21040. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
5
Salvage endoscopic nasoseptal flap repair of persistent cerebrospinal fluid leak after open skull base surgery.经颅底手术后持续性脑脊液漏的内镜鼻腔鼻中隔瓣修复术。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.07.005. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
6
Nasoseptal flap repair after endoscopic transsellar versus expanded endonasal approaches: is there an increased risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak?经蝶窦与扩大经鼻内镜手术后面隔瓣修复:术后脑脊液漏的风险是否增加?
Laryngoscope. 2012 Jun;122(6):1219-25. doi: 10.1002/lary.23285. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
7
Surgical nuances for nasoseptal flap reconstruction of cranial base defects with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks after endoscopic skull base surgery.内镜颅底手术后高流量脑脊液漏患者颅底缺损采用鼻中隔鼻瓣重建的手术细节。
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Jun;32(6):E7. doi: 10.3171/2012.5.FOCUS1255.
8
Comparative analysis of transnasal endoscopic reconstruction techniques for managing cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in skull base defects.经鼻内镜重建技术治疗颅底骨缺损性脑脊液鼻漏的对比分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jul;125:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.05.010. Epub 2024 May 13.
9
Nasoseptal flap takedown and reuse in revision endoscopic skull base reconstruction.翻瓣鼻中隔取下后在内镜颅底重建翻修术中的再利用。
Laryngoscope. 2011 Jan;121(1):42-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.21162.
10
Endoscopic Endonasal Reconstruction of Intraoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak in Different Skull Base Regions: Outcomes, Meningitis, and Risk Factors.内镜经鼻颅底重建术治疗不同颅底区域术中脑脊液漏:结局、脑膜炎和危险因素。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Sep;189:e736-e744. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.158. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery Complication Avoidance: A Contemporary Review.鼻内镜下颅底手术并发症的规避:当代综述
Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 8;12(12):1685. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121685.
2
Single Versus Double Hadad-Bassagasteguy Flap in Expanded Endoscopic Skull-Base Surgery.扩大内镜颅底手术中单次与双次哈达德-巴萨加斯特盖皮瓣的比较
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Sep;74(3):394-401. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02961-7. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
3
Advances in Pituitary Surgery.垂体手术进展。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2022 Aug;37(4):608-616. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2022.1546. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
4
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak after Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经蝶窦手术后脑脊液漏:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Aug 20;83(Suppl 2):e501-e513. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733918. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Risk Factors and Reconstruction Techniques for Persistent Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Posterior Fossa.经鼻内镜后颅窝手术患者持续性脑脊液漏的危险因素及重建技术
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 May 17;83(Suppl 2):e318-e323. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729904. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Clinical Impact of Hydroxyapatite on the Outcome of Skull Base Reconstruction for Intraoperative High-Flow CSF Leak: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.羟基磷灰石对术中高流量脑脊液漏颅底重建结局的临床影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2022 May 4;12:906162. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.906162. eCollection 2022.
7
Radioanatomical Study of the Skull Base and Septum in Chinese: Implications for Using the HBF for Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction.中国人颅底和鼻中隔的影像学研究:HBF 在经内镜颅底重建中的应用意义。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022 Mar 29;2022:9940239. doi: 10.1155/2022/9940239. eCollection 2022.
8
Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.鼻内镜下颅底重建结局报告的异质性:一项系统评价
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Oct;82(5):506-521. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714108. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
9
Multi-Layer Onlay Graft Using Hydroxyapatite Cement Placement without Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion for Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction.使用羟基磷灰石水泥进行多层覆盖移植且不进行脑脊液分流的内镜下颅底重建术
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021 Jul;64(4):619-630. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0231. Epub 2021 May 28.
10
Cerebrospinal fluid leakage repair of various grades developing during endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgery.内镜经鼻蝶窦手术过程中出现不同程度的脑脊液漏的修复。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 26;16(3):e0248229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248229. eCollection 2021.