Suppr超能文献

协作式照护对合并重度抑郁症的慢性躯体疾病门诊患者的成本效益。一项综合医院环境下的随机对照试验(CC-DIM)

Cost-utility of collaborative care for the treatment of comorbid major depressive disorder in outpatients with chronic physical conditions. A randomized controlled trial in the general hospital setting (CC-DIM).

作者信息

Goorden Maartje, van der Feltz-Cornelis Christina M, van Steenbergen-Weijenburg Kirsten M, Horn Eva K, Beekman Aartjan Tf, Hakkaart-van Roijen Leona

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG)/Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.

Tranzo Department, Tilburg University.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Jul 18;13:1881-1893. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S134008. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent in patients with a chronic physical condition, and this comorbidity has a negative influence on quality of life, health care costs, self-care, morbidity, and mortality. Research has shown that collaborative care (CC) may be a cost-effective treatment. However, its cost-effectiveness in this patient group has not yet been established. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of CC for the treatment of comorbid MDD in chronically ill patients in the outpatient general hospital setting. The study was conducted from a health care and societal perspective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 81 patients with moderate-to-severe MDD were included; 42 were randomly assigned to the CC group and 39 to the care as usual (CAU) group. We applied the TiC-P, short-form Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire, and EuroQol EQ-5D 3 level version, measuring the use of health care, informal care, and household work, respectively, at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean annual direct medical costs in the CC group were €6,718 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3,541 to 10,680) compared to €4,582 (95% CI: 2,782 to 6,740) in the CAU group. The average quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were 0.07 higher in the CC group, indicating that CC is more costly but also more effective than CAU. From a societal perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €24,690/QALY.

CONCLUSION

This first cost-utility analysis in chronically ill patients with comorbid MDD shows that CC may be a cost-effective treatment depending on willingness-to-pay levels. Nevertheless, the low utility scores emphasize the need for further research to improve the cost-effectiveness of CC in this highly prevalent and costly group of patients.

摘要

目的

重度抑郁症(MDD)在慢性身体疾病患者中高度流行,这种共病对生活质量、医疗保健成本、自我护理、发病率和死亡率有负面影响。研究表明,协作护理(CC)可能是一种具有成本效益的治疗方法。然而,其在该患者群体中的成本效益尚未确定。因此,本研究的目的是评估在门诊综合医院环境中,CC治疗慢性病患者合并MDD的成本效用。该研究是从医疗保健和社会角度进行的。

患者与方法

在这项随机对照试验中,纳入了81例中度至重度MDD患者;42例被随机分配到CC组,39例被分配到常规护理(CAU)组。我们应用TiC-P、健康相关生活质量简表问卷和欧洲五维度健康量表3级版本,分别在基线以及随访3、6、9和12个月时测量医疗保健使用情况、非正式护理和家务劳动。

结果

CC组的年均直接医疗成本为6718欧元(95%置信区间[CI]:3541至10680),而CAU组为4582欧元(95%CI:2782至6740)。CC组获得的平均质量调整生命年(QALY)高0.07,这表明CC比CAU成本更高,但也更有效。从社会角度来看,增量成本效益比为24690欧元/QALY。

结论

这项针对合并MDD的慢性病患者的首次成本效用分析表明,根据支付意愿水平,CC可能是一种具有成本效益的治疗方法。尽管如此,效用得分较低强调需要进一步研究,以提高CC在这一高度流行且成本高昂的患者群体中的成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/592a/5525903/3ee9d43551b2/ndt-13-1881Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验