Suppr超能文献

一个显著的差异?在昂贵药物的经济评估中与有偿和无偿工作相关的生产力成本。

A noticeable difference? Productivity costs related to paid and unpaid work in economic evaluations on expensive drugs.

作者信息

Krol Marieke, Papenburg Jocé, Tan Siok Swan, Brouwer Werner, Hakkaart Leona

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2016 May;17(4):391-402. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0685-x. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

Abstract

Productivity costs can strongly impact cost-effectiveness outcomes. This study investigated the impact in the context of expensive hospital drugs. This study aimed to: (1) investigate the effect of productivity costs on cost-effectiveness outcomes, (2) determine whether economic evaluations of expensive drugs commonly include productivity costs related to paid and unpaid work, and (3) explore potential reasons for excluding productivity costs from the economic evaluation. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify economic evaluations of 33 expensive drugs. We analysed whether evaluations included productivity costs and whether inclusion or exclusion was related to the study population's age, health and national health economic guidelines. The impact on cost-effectiveness outcomes was assessed in studies that included productivity costs. Of 249 identified economic evaluations of expensive drugs, 22 (9 %) included productivity costs related to paid work. One study included unpaid productivity. Mostly, productivity cost exclusion could not be explained by the study population's age and health status, but national guidelines appeared influential. Productivity costs proved often highly influential. This study indicates that productivity costs in economic evaluations of expensive hospital drugs are commonly and inconsistently ignored in economic evaluations. This warrants caution in interpreting and comparing the results of these evaluations.

摘要

生产力成本会对成本效益结果产生重大影响。本研究在昂贵的医院药物背景下调查了这种影响。本研究旨在:(1)调查生产力成本对成本效益结果的影响;(2)确定昂贵药物的经济评估是否通常包括与有偿和无偿工作相关的生产力成本;(3)探究在经济评估中排除生产力成本的潜在原因。我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以确定对33种昂贵药物的经济评估。我们分析了评估是否包括生产力成本,以及纳入或排除是否与研究人群的年龄、健康状况和国家卫生经济指南有关。在包括生产力成本的研究中评估了对成本效益结果的影响。在249项已确定的昂贵药物经济评估中,22项(9%)包括与有偿工作相关的生产力成本。一项研究包括无偿生产力成本。大多数情况下,生产力成本的排除无法用研究人群的年龄和健康状况来解释,但国家指南似乎具有影响力。生产力成本往往被证明具有高度影响力。本研究表明,在昂贵医院药物的经济评估中,生产力成本在经济评估中通常被忽视且不一致。这在解释和比较这些评估结果时需要谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6be5/4837201/6d9feb7933ca/10198_2015_685_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A noticeable difference? Productivity costs related to paid and unpaid work in economic evaluations on expensive drugs.
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 May;17(4):391-402. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0685-x. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
The Estimation and Inclusion of Presenteeism Costs in Applied Economic Evaluation: A Systematic Review.
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):496-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
10
Tiotropium versus long-acting beta-agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009157. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009157.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
The Gift of Time, How Do I Want to Spend It? Exploring Preferences for Time Allocation Among Women with and without a Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Mar;23(2):253-264. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00934-9. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
3
Insights and networks: methodological assessment and scientometric analysis of economic evaluations in dentistry.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):1182. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11668-8.
4
The need for a broad perspective when assessing value-for-money for out-of-hours primary care.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Sep 20;25:e37. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000318.
5
Production Losses due to Absenteeism and Presenteeism: The Influence of Compensation Mechanisms and Multiplier Effects.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Sep;41(9):1103-1115. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01253-y. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
8
Systematic Literature Review of the Use of Productivity Losses/Gains in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Immune-Mediated Disorders.
Adv Ther. 2022 Dec;39(12):5327-5350. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02321-z. Epub 2022 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

2
How to estimate productivity costs in economic evaluations.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Apr;32(4):335-44. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0132-3.
3
Productivity costs in economic evaluations: past, present, future.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jul;31(7):537-49. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0056-3.
4
Projecting future drug expenditures in U.S. nonfederal hospitals and clinics--2013.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Mar 15;70(6):525-39. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120759.
6
Measuring and valuing productivity loss due to poor health: A critical review.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(2):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.026. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
8
Productivity loss due to presenteeism among patients with arthritis: estimates from 4 instruments.
J Rheumatol. 2010 Sep;37(9):1805-14. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100123. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
9
In or out? Income losses in health state valuations: a review.
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):298-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00614.x. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
10
Ten arguments for a societal perspective in the economic evaluation of medical innovations.
Eur J Health Econ. 2009 Oct;10(4):357-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0173-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验