Ross Southern Laboratories, Spanish Fork, Utah, USA
Ross Southern Laboratories, Spanish Fork, Utah, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Oct;55(10):3046-3056. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01004-17. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
The most reliable test method for the serological confirmation of Lyme disease (LD) is a 2-tier method recommended by the CDC in 1995. The first-tier test is a low-specificity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the second-tier tests are higher-specificity IgG and IgM Western blots. This study describes the selection of two recombinant proteins and evaluation of their performance in a simple 1-tier test for the serological confirmation of LD. These two proteins were generated from (i) the full-length gene combined with the invariable region 6 of the gene (DbpA/C6) and (b) the full-length gene (OspC). The expressed DbpA/C6 and OspC proteins were useful in detecting anti- IgG and IgM antibodies, respectively. A blind study was conducted on a well-characterized panel of 279 human sera from the CDC, comparing ELISAs using these two recombinant antigens with the 2-tier test method. The two methods (DbpA/C6-OspC versus 2-tier test) were equivalent in identifying sera from negative-control subjects (99% and 100% specificity, respectively) and in detecting stage II and III LD patient sera (100% and 100% sensitivity). However, the DbpA/C6-OspC ELISA was markedly better (80% versus 63%) than the 2-tier test method in detecting anti- antibodies in stage I LD patients. The findings suggest that these antigens could be used in a simple 1-tier ELISA that is faster to perform, easier to interpret, and less expensive than the 2-tier test method and which is better at detecting -specific antibodies in sera from patients with stage I LD.
用于莱姆病(LD)血清学确认的最可靠检测方法是 1995 年美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)推荐的 2 级方法。一级检测是低特异性酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA),二级检测是更高特异性的 IgG 和 IgM 免疫印迹。本研究描述了两种重组蛋白的选择及其在简单的 1 级检测中用于 LD 血清学确认的性能评估。这两种蛋白分别来自(i)全长基因与基因不变区 6 的组合(DbpA/C6)和(b)全长基因(OspC)。表达的 DbpA/C6 和 OspC 蛋白分别可用于检测抗 IgG 和 IgM 抗体。对来自 CDC 的 279 份人类血清的特征明确的样本进行了盲法研究,比较了使用这两种重组抗原的 ELISA 与 2 级检测方法。这两种方法(DbpA/C6-OspC 与 2 级检测)在鉴定阴性对照受试者血清方面(特异性分别为 99%和 100%)和在检测 II 期和 III 期 LD 患者血清方面(敏感性均为 100%)等效。然而,与 2 级检测方法相比,DbpA/C6-OspC ELISA 检测 I 期 LD 患者抗 - 抗体的能力明显更好(80%比 63%)。研究结果表明,这些抗原可用于简单的 1 级 ELISA,该方法比 2 级检测方法更快、更易于解释、更便宜,并且更擅长检测 I 期 LD 患者血清中的 - 特异性抗体。