Jordan Timothy R, McGowan Victoria A, Kurtev Stoyan, Paterson Kevin B
Department of Psychology, Zayed UniversityDubai, United Arab Emirates.
Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Behaviour, University of LeicesterLeicester, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 18;8:807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00807. eCollection 2017.
Printed words are complex visual stimuli containing a range of different spatial frequencies, and several studies have suggested that various spatial frequencies are effective for skilled adult reading. But while it is well known that the area of text from which information is acquired during reading extends to the left and right of each fixation, the effectiveness of spatial frequencies falling each side of fixation has yet to be determined. To investigate this issue, we used a spatial frequency adaptation of the gaze-contingent moving-window paradigm in which sentences were shown to skilled adult readers either entirely as normal or filtered to contain only low, medium, or high spatial frequencies except for a window of normal text around each point of fixation. Windows replaced filtered text either symmetrically 1 character to the left and right of each fixated character, or asymmetrically, 1 character to the left and 7 or 13 to the right, or 1 character to the right and 7 or 13 to the left. Reading times and eye-movement measures showed that reading performance for sentences presented entirely as normal generally changed very little with filtered displays when windows extended to the right but was often disrupted when windows extended to the left. However, asymmetrical windows affected performance on both sides of fixation. Indeed, increasing the leftward extent of windows from 7 to 13 characters produced decreases in both reading times and fixation durations, suggesting that reading was influenced by the spatial frequency content of leftward areas of text some considerable distance from fixation. Overall, the findings show that while a range of different spatial frequencies can be used by skilled adult readers, the effectiveness of spatial frequencies differs for text on each side of central vision, and may reflect different roles played by these two areas of text during reading.
印刷文字是包含一系列不同空间频率的复杂视觉刺激,多项研究表明,各种空间频率对熟练的成年读者阅读有效。虽然众所周知,阅读过程中获取信息的文本区域会延伸到每次注视点的左右两侧,但注视点两侧空间频率的有效性尚未确定。为了研究这个问题,我们使用了注视点相关移动窗口范式的空间频率适应性方法,在该方法中,句子要么完全以正常形式呈现给熟练的成年读者,要么经过过滤,使其除了每个注视点周围的正常文本窗口外,只包含低、中或高空间频率。窗口要么在每个注视字符左右对称替换1个字符的过滤文本,要么不对称替换,在左侧替换1个字符,右侧替换7个或13个字符,或者在右侧替换1个字符,左侧替换7个或13个字符。阅读时间和眼动测量结果表明,当窗口向右扩展时,完全以正常形式呈现的句子的阅读表现通常在过滤显示时变化很小,但当窗口向左扩展时,阅读表现常常受到干扰。然而,不对称窗口会影响注视点两侧的表现。事实上,将窗口向左扩展的范围从7个字符增加到13个字符会导致阅读时间和注视持续时间都减少,这表明阅读受到离注视点有一定距离的左侧文本区域的空间频率内容的影响。总体而言,研究结果表明,虽然熟练的成年读者可以使用一系列不同的空间频率,但中央视觉两侧文本的空间频率有效性不同,这可能反映了这两个文本区域在阅读过程中所起的不同作用。