Habibollahi Peiman, Shin Benjamin, Shamchi Sara P, Wachtel Heather, Fraker Douglas L, Trerotola Scott O
Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Jan;41(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1757-3. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
Parathyroid venous sampling (PAVS) is usually reserved for patients with persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy with inconclusive noninvasive imaging studies. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of super-selective PAVS (SSVS) in patients needing revision neck surgery with inconclusive imaging.
Patients undergoing PAVS between 2005 and 2016 due to persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism following surgery were reviewed. PAVS was performed in all patients using super-selective technique. Single-value measurements within central neck veins performed as part of super-selective PAVS were used to simulate selective venous sampling (SVS) and allow for comparison to data, which might be obtained in a non-super-selective approach.
32 patients (mean age 51 ± 15 years; 8 men and 24 women) met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of SSVS for localizing the source of elevated PTH to a limited area in the neck or chest was 96 and 84%, respectively. Simulated SVS, on the other hand, had a sensitivity of 28% and a PPV of 89% based on the predefined gold standard. SSVS had a significantly higher sensitivity compared to simulated SVS (p < 0.001).
SSVS is highly effective in localizing the source of hyperparathyroidism in patients undergoing revision surgery for hyperparathyroidism in whom noninvasive imaging studies are inconclusive. SSVS data had also markedly higher sensitivity for localizing disease in these patients compared to simulated SVS.
甲状旁腺静脉采血(PAVS)通常用于甲状旁腺切除术后持续性或复发性甲状旁腺功能亢进且无创影像学检查结果不明确的患者。进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估超选择性PAVS(SSVS)在影像学检查结果不明确且需要进行颈部翻修手术的患者中的诊断效能。
回顾了2005年至2016年间因手术后持续性或复发性甲状旁腺功能亢进而接受PAVS的患者。所有患者均采用超选择性技术进行PAVS。作为超选择性PAVS一部分的颈部中央静脉内的单值测量用于模拟选择性静脉采血(SVS),并与非超选择性方法可能获得的数据进行比较。
32例患者(平均年龄51±15岁;8例男性,24例女性)符合纳入和排除标准。SSVS将甲状旁腺激素升高的来源定位到颈部或胸部有限区域的敏感性和阳性预测值(PPV)分别为96%和84%。另一方面,基于预定义的金标准,模拟SVS的敏感性为28%,PPV为89%。与模拟SVS相比,SSVS的敏感性显著更高(p<0.001)。
对于无创影像学检查结果不明确且接受甲状旁腺功能亢进翻修手术的患者,SSVS在定位甲状旁腺功能亢进的来源方面非常有效。与模拟SVS相比,SSVS数据在定位这些患者的疾病方面也具有明显更高的敏感性。