Suppr超能文献

在晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中,进行的一项随机2期研究,比较了维持使用林西替尼(OSI-906)联合厄洛替尼与安慰剂加厄洛替尼在铂类化疗后的疗效。

Randomised Phase 2 study of maintenance linsitinib (OSI-906) in combination with erlotinib compared with placebo plus erlotinib after platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

作者信息

Ciuleanu Tudor-Eliade, Ahmed Samreen, Kim Joo-Hang, Mezger Jörg, Park Keunchil, Thomas Michael, Chen Jihong, Poondru Srinivasu, VanTornout Jan M, Whitcomb Debbie, Blackhall Fiona

机构信息

Oncological Institute I Chiricuta and UMF Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2017 Sep 5;117(6):757-766. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.226. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maintenance therapy is important in advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Erlotinib as switch maintenance following platinum-based chemotherapy increases survival. Cross-talk between the epidermal growth factor receptor and insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR) pathways mediate resistance to individual receptor blockade. This study compared maintenance linsitinib plus erlotinib vs erlotinib plus placebo in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

In this Phase II randomised trial, patients without progression following four cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (N=205) received continuous schedule maintenance oral linsitinib 150 mg or placebo BID combined with erlotinib 150 mg QD for 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The study was unblinded early due to linsitinib non-superiority. No difference was found between the two treatment groups in median PFS of 125 days linsitinib vs 129 days placebo (P=0.601); no difference in overall survival (OS) was observed. Tolerability was similar, although in the linsitinib group, treatment-related adverse events and discontinuations were more frequent. No drug-drug interaction was implicated.

CONCLUSIONS

Linsitinib maintenance therapy added to erlotinib did not improve PFS or OS in non-progressing NSCLC patients. This highlights the need for robust biomarkers of response for combinations that incorporate IGFR-targeted therapies in maintenance or other therapeutic settings.

摘要

背景

维持治疗在晚期/转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中很重要。厄洛替尼作为铂类化疗后的转换维持治疗可提高生存率。表皮生长因子受体和胰岛素样生长因子受体(IGFR)途径之间的相互作用介导了对单个受体阻断的耐药性。本研究比较了在NSCLC患者中使用林西替尼联合厄洛替尼与厄洛替尼联合安慰剂进行维持治疗的效果。

方法

在这项II期随机试验中,205例在接受4个周期一线铂类化疗后未进展的患者,接受连续方案的维持口服林西替尼150mg或安慰剂,每日2次,联合厄洛替尼150mg,每日1次,每21天为一个周期。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

由于林西替尼不具有优越性,该研究提前揭盲。两个治疗组的中位PFS无差异,林西替尼组为125天,安慰剂组为129天(P = 0.601);总生存期(OS)也无差异。耐受性相似,尽管在林西替尼组中,治疗相关不良事件和停药更为频繁。未发现药物相互作用。

结论

在未进展的NSCLC患者中,厄洛替尼联合林西替尼维持治疗并未改善PFS或OS。这凸显了在维持治疗或其他治疗环境中,对于包含IGFR靶向治疗的联合方案,需要强有力的反应生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/259b/5589984/e0da689f63d7/bjc2017226f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验