Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine.
Beckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine.
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):19-23. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.0710.
Despite the large number of studies focused on defining frontal or lateral facial attractiveness, no reports have examined whether a significant association between frontal and lateral facial attractiveness exists.
To examine the association between frontal and lateral facial attractiveness and to identify anatomical features that may influence discordance between frontal and lateral facial beauty.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Paired frontal and lateral facial synthetic images of 240 white women (age range, 18-25 years) were evaluated from September 30, 2004, to September 29, 2008, using an internet-based focus group (n = 600) on an attractiveness Likert scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being least attractive and 10 being most attractive. Data analysis was performed from December 6, 2016, to March 30, 2017. The association between frontal and lateral attractiveness scores was determined using linear regression. Outliers were defined as data outside the 95% individual prediction interval. To identify features that contribute to score discordance between frontal and lateral attractiveness scores, each of these image pairs were scrutinized by an evaluator panel for facial features that were present in the frontal or lateral projections and absent in the other respective facial projections.
Attractiveness scores obtained from internet-based focus groups.
For the 240 white women studied (mean [SD] age, 21.4 [2.2] years), attractiveness scores ranged from 3.4 to 9.5 for frontal images and 3.3 to 9.4 for lateral images. The mean (SD) frontal attractiveness score was 6.9 (1.4), whereas the mean (SD) lateral attractiveness score was 6.4 (1.3). Simple linear regression of frontal and lateral attractiveness scores resulted in a coefficient of determination of r2 = 0.749. Eight outlier pairs were identified and analyzed by panel evaluation. Panel evaluation revealed no clinically applicable association between frontal and lateral images among outliers; however, contributory facial features were suggested. Thin upper lip, convex nose, and blunt cervicomental angle were suggested by evaluators as facial characteristics that contributed to outlier frontal or lateral attractiveness scores.
This study identified a strong linear association between frontal and lateral facial attractiveness. Furthermore, specific facial landmarks responsible for the discordance between frontal and lateral facial attractiveness scores were suggested. Additional studies are necessary to determine whether correction of these landmarks may increase facial harmony and attractiveness.
NA.
尽管有大量研究致力于定义正面或侧面面部吸引力,但尚无报道研究正面和侧面面部吸引力之间是否存在显著关联。
检查正面和侧面面部吸引力之间的关联,并确定可能影响正面和侧面面部美观之间差异的解剖特征。
设计、设置和参与者:使用基于互联网的焦点小组(n=600),从 2004 年 9 月 30 日至 2008 年 9 月 29 日,对 240 名白人女性(年龄 18-25 岁)的正面和侧面合成面部图像进行评估,使用吸引力李克特量表进行评估,范围为 1 到 10,1 表示最不吸引人,10 表示最吸引人。数据分析于 2016 年 12 月 6 日至 2017 年 3 月 30 日进行。使用线性回归确定正面和侧面吸引力评分之间的关联。离群值定义为数据超出 95%个体预测区间。为了确定导致正面和侧面吸引力评分之间差异的特征,评估小组仔细检查了每对这些图像,以确定存在于正面或侧面投影中而在另一相应投影中不存在的面部特征。
从互联网焦点小组获得的吸引力评分。
对于研究的 240 名白人女性(平均[标准差]年龄为 21.4[2.2]岁),正面图像的吸引力评分范围为 3.4 到 9.5,侧面图像的吸引力评分范围为 3.3 到 9.4。正面吸引力的平均(标准差)评分是 6.9(1.4),而侧面吸引力的平均(标准差)评分是 6.4(1.3)。正面和侧面吸引力评分的简单线性回归得到决定系数 r2=0.749。确定了 8 对离群值对,并由小组评估进行分析。小组评估显示,离群值之间不存在正面和侧面图像之间具有临床意义的关联;然而,评估小组提出了一些促成因素。评估员认为,薄上唇、凸鼻和钝颈角是导致正面或侧面吸引力评分离群的面部特征。
本研究确定了正面和侧面面部吸引力之间存在很强的线性关联。此外,还提出了导致正面和侧面面部吸引力评分差异的特定面部标志。需要进一步的研究来确定是否可以通过矫正这些标志来提高面部的协调性和吸引力。
无。