利用 MRI 上的神经形态学定位 L5 椎体:一种准确可靠的技术。
Localizing the L5 Vertebra Using Nerve Morphology on MRI: An Accurate and Reliable Technique.
机构信息
From the Neuroradiology Division (M.E.P., T.A.H., G.J.S., L.M.S.)
From the Neuroradiology Division (M.E.P., T.A.H., G.J.S., L.M.S.).
出版信息
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Oct;38(10):2008-2014. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5311. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Multiple methods have been used to determine the lumbar vertebral level on MR imaging, particularly when full spine imaging is unavailable. Because postmortem studies show 95% accuracy of numbering the lumbar vertebral bodies by counting the lumbar nerve roots, attention to lumbar nerve morphology on axial MR imaging can provide numbering clues. We sought to determine whether the L5 vertebra could be accurately localized by using nerve morphology on MR imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
One hundred eight cases with full spine MR imaging were numbered from the C2 vertebral body to the sacrum with note of thoracolumbar and lumbosacral transitional states. The origin level of the L5 nerve and iliolumbar ligament were documented in all cases. The reference standard of numbering by full spine imaging was compared with the nerve morphology numbering method. Five blinded raters evaluated all lumbar MRIs with nerve morphology technique twice. Prevalence and bias-adjusted κ were used to measure interrater and intrarater reliability.
RESULTS
The L5 nerve arose from the 24th presacral vertebra (L5) in 106/108 cases. The percentage of perfect agreement with the reference standard was 98.1% (95% CI, 93.5%-99.8%), which was preserved in transitional and numeric variation states. The iliolumbar ligament localization method showed 83.3% (95% CI, 74.9%-89.8%) perfect agreement with the reference standard. Inter- and intrarater reliability when using the nerve morphology method was strong.
CONCLUSIONS
The exiting L5 nerve can allow accurate localization of the corresponding vertebrae, which is essential for preprocedure planning in cases where full spine imaging is not available. This neuroanatomic method displays higher agreement with the reference standard compared with previously described methods, with strong inter- and intrarater reliability.
背景与目的
在磁共振成像(MR 成像)中,尤其是在无法进行全脊柱成像时,已经使用了多种方法来确定腰椎水平。由于尸检研究显示,通过计数腰椎神经根对腰椎椎体进行编号的准确率为 95%,因此在轴位 MR 成像上注意腰椎神经根的形态可以提供编号线索。我们试图确定是否可以通过使用 MR 成像上的神经根形态来准确定位 L5 椎体。
材料与方法
对 108 例进行全脊柱 MR 成像的患者进行编号,从 C2 椎体到骶骨,并记录胸腰椎和腰骶椎过渡状态。在所有病例中,记录 L5 神经根的起源水平和髂腰韧带。将全脊柱成像编号的参考标准与神经根形态编号方法进行比较。5 名盲法评估者使用神经根形态技术两次评估所有腰椎 MRI。使用普遍性和偏倚调整的κ值来衡量评估者间和评估者内的可靠性。
结果
在 108 例中,L5 神经根起源于第 24 个骶前椎体(L5),占 106/108 例。与参考标准完全一致的百分比为 98.1%(95%置信区间,93.5%-99.8%),在过渡和数值变化状态下保持不变。髂腰韧带定位方法与参考标准完全一致的比例为 83.3%(95%置信区间,74.9%-89.8%)。使用神经根形态方法时,评估者间和评估者内的可靠性均较强。
结论
发出的 L5 神经根可准确定位相应的椎体,对于无法进行全脊柱成像的情况下,术前规划至关重要。与之前描述的方法相比,这种神经解剖方法与参考标准的一致性更高,评估者间和评估者内的可靠性均较强。
相似文献
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017-8-3
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013-5-1
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006-7
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999-9-1
引用本文的文献
J Int Med Res. 2024-1
Childs Nerv Syst. 2022-11
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022-7
本文引用的文献
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016-1
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013-5-1