Tiihonen Marianne, Brattico Elvira, Maksimainen Johanna, Wikgren Jan, Saarikallio Suvi
Finnish Centre for Interdisciplinary Music Research, Department of Music, Art and Culture Studies, University of JyväskyläJyväskylä, Finland.
Center for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and The Royal Academy of Music, Aarhus/AalborgAarhus, Denmark.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 20;8:1218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01218. eCollection 2017.
The present literature review investigated how pleasure induced by music and visual-art has been conceptually understood in empirical research over the past 20 years. After an initial selection of abstracts from seven databases (keywords: pleasure, reward, enjoyment, and hedonic), twenty music and eleven visual-art papers were systematically compared. The following questions were addressed: (1) What is the role of the keyword in the research question? (2) Is pleasure considered a result of variation in the perceiver's internal or external attributes? (3) What are the most commonly employed methods and main variables in empirical settings? Based on these questions, our critical integrative analysis aimed to identify which themes and processes emerged as key features for conceptualizing art-induced pleasure. The results demonstrated great variance in how pleasure has been approached: In the music studies pleasure was often a clear object of investigation, whereas in the visual-art studies the term was often embedded into the context of an aesthetic experience, or used otherwise in a descriptive, indirect sense. Music studies often targeted different emotions, their intensity or anhedonia. Biographical and background variables and personality traits of the perceiver were often measured. Next to behavioral methods, a common method was brain imaging which often targeted the reward circuitry of the brain in response to music. Visual-art pleasure was also frequently addressed using brain imaging methods, but the research focused on sensory cortices rather than the reward circuit alone. Compared with music research, visual-art research investigated more frequently pleasure in relation to conscious, cognitive processing, where the variations of stimulus features and the changing of viewing modes were regarded as explanatory factors of the derived experience. Despite valence being frequently applied in both domains, we conclude, that in empirical music research pleasure seems to be part of core affect and hedonic tone modulated by stable personality variables, whereas in visual-art research pleasure is a result of the so called conceptual act depending on a chosen strategy to approach art. We encourage an integration of music and visual-art into to a multi-modal framework to promote a more versatile understanding of pleasure in response to aesthetic artifacts.
本综述探讨了在过去20年的实证研究中,音乐和视觉艺术所带来的愉悦是如何在概念上被理解的。在从七个数据库(关键词:愉悦、奖励、享受、享乐主义)初步筛选摘要后,对20篇音乐论文和11篇视觉艺术论文进行了系统比较。研究了以下问题:(1)关键词在研究问题中的作用是什么?(2)愉悦被认为是感知者内部或外部属性变化的结果吗?(3)实证研究中最常用的方法和主要变量是什么?基于这些问题,我们的批判性综合分析旨在确定哪些主题和过程成为了概念化艺术诱发愉悦的关键特征。结果表明,在研究愉悦的方式上存在很大差异:在音乐研究中,愉悦通常是一个明确的研究对象,而在视觉艺术研究中,这个术语常常被嵌入到审美体验的背景中,或以其他描述性、间接的方式使用。音乐研究通常针对不同的情绪、其强度或快感缺失。感知者的传记和背景变量以及个性特征经常被测量。除了行为方法外,一种常见的方法是脑成像,它通常针对大脑对音乐的奖励回路。视觉艺术带来的愉悦也经常通过脑成像方法进行研究,但研究重点是感觉皮层,而不仅仅是奖励回路。与音乐研究相比,视觉艺术研究更频繁地探讨与有意识的认知加工相关的愉悦,其中刺激特征的变化和观看模式的改变被视为所产生体验的解释因素。尽管效价在这两个领域都经常被应用,但我们得出结论,在实证音乐研究中,愉悦似乎是由稳定的个性变量调节的核心情感和享乐基调的一部分,而在视觉艺术研究中,愉悦是所谓概念行为的结果,这取决于接近艺术的选定策略。我们鼓励将音乐和视觉艺术整合到一个多模态框架中,以促进对审美作品所带来愉悦的更全面理解。