Jensen D M
Am J Med. 1986 Oct 24;81(4B):42-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90599-1.
The costs of peptic ulcer disease to society are very high. Costs can be expressed as either direct or indirect. Direct costs include hospitalization or clinic visits, physicians' fees, and medication. Indirect costs are loss of productivity due to absenteeism from work or loss of income from death of an employee. The daily cost of different ulcer drugs such as the histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists for intravenous treatment, acute healing, and maintenance can easily be compared. As newer anti-ulcer drugs such as H2-receptor antagonists have been introduced into the marketplace, the number of prescriptions and medication costs have increased rather than decreased. In part, this may be accounted for by the high frequency with which H2 antagonists are prescribed for patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. Some patients have chronic peptic ulcer disease with multiple painful recurrences or complications such as hemorrhage, perforation, or obstruction. They may require long-term care or drug maintenance, hospitalization, or surgery. For patients with chronic ulcer disease or complications, randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy, safety, and costs of different forms of therapy (maintenance drugs, surgery, or placebo) have not been reported. However, based upon good efficacy and safety for acute healing and long-term drug maintenance for painful duodenal ulcer disease, long-term maintenance with H2-receptor antagonists is now prescribed for many patients. No controlled randomized trials have been reported to document that long-term maintenance with H2-receptor antagonists actually reduces peptic ulcer complications. However, by current cost estimates, long-term H2-receptor antagonist therapy is less expensive than ulcer surgery for uncomplicated ulcer disease for up to eight years. However, maintenance drug therapy after eight years may be more expensive than elective ulcer surgery in patients with chronic peptic ulcer disease who are good surgical candidates. Patients with complications of peptic ulcer disease seem to represent a different subset than patients with symptomatic ulcer disease. Further studies in these subsets are needed to ascertain the most effective, safest, and least expensive management such as surgery, long-term drug maintenance, or intermittent drug therapy to prevent recurrent ulceration or complications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
消化性溃疡疾病给社会带来的成本非常高昂。成本可分为直接成本和间接成本。直接成本包括住院或门诊就诊、医生诊疗费以及药物费用。间接成本是因旷工导致的生产力损失或员工死亡造成的收入损失。不同溃疡药物(如用于静脉治疗、急性愈合和维持治疗的组胺(H2)受体拮抗剂)的每日成本很容易进行比较。随着诸如H2受体拮抗剂等新型抗溃疡药物进入市场,处方数量和药物成本非但没有下降,反而有所增加。部分原因可能是H2拮抗剂被大量用于非溃疡性消化不良患者。一些患者患有慢性消化性溃疡疾病,伴有多次疼痛复发或出血、穿孔或梗阻等并发症。他们可能需要长期护理、药物维持治疗、住院治疗或手术。对于患有慢性溃疡疾病或并发症的患者,尚未有随机对照试验来比较不同治疗方式(维持药物、手术或安慰剂)的疗效、安全性和成本。然而,基于对急性愈合的良好疗效和安全性以及对疼痛性十二指肠溃疡疾病的长期药物维持治疗效果,现在许多患者都被处方使用H2受体拮抗剂进行长期维持治疗。尚无随机对照试验报告证明H2受体拮抗剂的长期维持治疗实际上能减少消化性溃疡并发症。然而,根据目前的成本估算,对于无并发症的溃疡疾病,长达八年的H2受体拮抗剂长期治疗比溃疡手术成本更低。然而,对于慢性消化性溃疡疾病且适合手术的患者,八年之后的维持药物治疗可能比选择性溃疡手术成本更高。消化性溃疡疾病并发症患者似乎与有症状的溃疡疾病患者属于不同的亚组。需要对这些亚组进行进一步研究,以确定最有效、最安全且成本最低的治疗方法,如手术、长期药物维持治疗或间歇性药物治疗,以预防溃疡复发或并发症。(摘要截选至400字)