Suppr超能文献

肿瘤学家如何为老年癌症患者制定化疗决策?对澳大利亚肿瘤学家的调查。

How do oncologists make decisions about chemotherapy for their older patients with cancer? A survey of Australian oncologists.

机构信息

Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Building 76, Hospital Rd, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia.

Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):451-460. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3843-0. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Oncologists are making treatment decisions on increasing numbers of older patients with cancer. Due to comorbidities and frailty that increase with age, such decisions are often complex. We determined factors influencing oncologists' decisions to prescribe chemotherapy for older adults.

METHODS

Members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA) were invited to complete an online survey in February to April 2016.

RESULTS

Ninety-three oncologists completed the survey of which 69 (74%) were consultants and 24 (26%) were trainees, with most (72, 77%) working predominantly in a public hospital-associated practice. The three highest ranked factors influencing decisions about (a) adjuvant chemotherapy were performance status, survival benefit of treatment, and life expectancy in the absence of cancer and about (b) palliative chemotherapy were performance status, patient preference, and quality of life. Most geriatric health domains are reportedly assessed routinely by the majority of respondents, though few routinely use geriatric screening tools (14%) or geriatric assessments (5%). In hypothetical patient scenarios, oncologists were less likely to prescribe palliative and adjuvant chemotherapy as age and rates of severe toxicity increased.

CONCLUSION

Performance status was the most influential factor for oncologists when making a decision about chemotherapy for their older patients, and the importance of other factors differed according to treatment intent. Oncologists were less likely to recommend chemotherapy as patient age and treatment toxicity increased. The low uptake of geriatric assessments or screening tools provides scope for improved clinical assessment of older adults in treatment decision-making.

摘要

目的

越来越多的肿瘤科医生需要为患有癌症的老年患者做出治疗决策。由于与年龄相关的合并症和虚弱的增加,此类决策通常较为复杂。我们确定了影响肿瘤科医生为老年人开具化疗药物的决策的因素。

方法

澳大利亚肿瘤医学组(MOGA)的成员被邀请在 2016 年 2 月至 4 月期间完成一项在线调查。

结果

93 名肿瘤学家完成了调查,其中 69 名(74%)为顾问,24 名(26%)为受训者,大多数(72%,77%)主要在公立医院附属的医疗机构工作。影响(a)辅助化疗决策的三个最高排名的因素是体能状态、治疗的生存获益以及无癌症情况下的预期寿命,而影响(b)姑息化疗决策的三个最高排名的因素是体能状态、患者偏好和生活质量。大多数老年健康领域据称被大多数受访者常规评估,但很少有受访者常规使用老年筛选工具(14%)或老年评估(5%)。在假设的患者情况下,随着年龄和严重毒性发生率的增加,肿瘤学家不太可能开具姑息性和辅助性化疗。

结论

当为老年患者做出化疗决策时,体能状态是肿瘤科医生最具影响力的因素,而其他因素的重要性则根据治疗目的而有所不同。随着患者年龄和治疗毒性的增加,肿瘤学家推荐化疗的可能性降低。老年评估或筛选工具的低使用率为改善老年患者治疗决策中的临床评估提供了空间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验