Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov;166(2):593-601. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4428-9. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
Breast cancer molecular prognostic tools that predict recurrence risk have mainly been established on endocrine-treated patients and thus are not optimal for the evaluation of benefit from endocrine therapy. The Stockholm tamoxifen (STO-3) trial which randomized postmenopausal node-negative patients to 2-year tamoxifen (followed by an optional randomization for an additional 3-year tamoxifen vs nil), versus no adjuvant treatment, provides a unique opportunity to evaluate long-term 20-year benefit of endocrine therapy within prognostic risk classes of the 70-gene prognosis signature that was developed on adjuvantly untreated patients.
We assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis 20-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and 10-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for 538 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, STO-3 trial patients with retrospectively ascertained 70-gene prognosis classification. Multivariable analysis of long-term (20 years) BCSS by STO-3 trial arm in the 70-gene high-risk and low-risk subgroups was performed using Cox proportional hazard modeling adjusting for classical patient and tumor characteristics.
Tamoxifen-treated, 70-gene low- and high-risk patients had 20-year BCSS of 90 and 83%, as compared to 80 and 65% for untreated patients, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001). Notably, there is equivalent tamoxifen benefit in both high (HR 0.42 (0.21-0.86), p = 0.018) and low (HR 0.46 (0.25-0.85), p = 0.013) 70-gene risk categories even after adjusting for clinico-pathological factors for BCSS. Limited tamoxifen exposure as given in the STO-3 trial provides persistent benefit for 10-15 years after diagnosis in a time-varying analysis. 10-year DMFS was 93 and 85% for low- and high-risk tamoxifen-treated, versus 83 and 70% for low- and high-risk untreated patients, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001).
Patients with ER-positive breast cancer, regardless of high or low 70-gene risk classification, receive significant survival benefit lasting over 10 years from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, even when given for a relatively short duration.
预测复发风险的乳腺癌分子预后工具主要是基于接受内分泌治疗的患者建立的,因此对于评估内分泌治疗的获益并不理想。斯德哥尔摩他莫昔芬(STO-3)试验将绝经后淋巴结阴性患者随机分为 2 年他莫昔芬(随后可选随机接受额外 3 年他莫昔芬或无治疗)与无辅助治疗,为评估无辅助治疗的 70 基因预后标志物中预后风险类别的内分泌治疗的 20 年长期获益提供了独特的机会。
我们通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估了 538 例雌激素受体(ER)阳性、STO-3 试验患者的 20 年乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)和 10 年远处无转移生存(DMFS),这些患者的 70 基因预后分类是通过回顾性确定的。使用 Cox 比例风险建模对 STO-3 试验臂在 70 基因高风险和低风险亚组中的长期(20 年)BCSS 进行多变量分析,调整了经典患者和肿瘤特征。
与未治疗的患者相比,接受他莫昔芬治疗的 70 基因低风险和高风险患者的 20 年 BCSS 分别为 90%和 83%,而未治疗的患者分别为 80%和 65%(对数秩检验 p<0.0001)。值得注意的是,在调整了 BCSS 的临床病理因素后,高(HR 0.42(0.21-0.86),p=0.018)和低(HR 0.46(0.25-0.85),p=0.013)70 基因风险类别中均有等效的他莫昔芬获益。在 STO-3 试验中给予的有限他莫昔芬暴露在时间变化分析中,在诊断后 10-15 年内持续提供获益。低风险和高风险他莫昔芬治疗的患者 10 年 DMFS 分别为 93%和 85%,而低风险和高风险未治疗的患者分别为 83%和 70%(对数秩检验 p<0.0001)。
无论 70 基因风险分类高低,ER 阳性乳腺癌患者均可从辅助他莫昔芬治疗中获得显著的生存获益,持续时间超过 10 年,即使治疗时间相对较短。