Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Nov 15;105(4):795-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.052. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Deintensification of adjuvant therapy is being considered for older women with early-stage, biologically favorable breast cancer. Although radiation therapy (RT) can be omitted in some cases, toxicity from hormone therapy (HT) is not trivial, and adherence rates vary. We hypothesized that adjuvant RT alone would produce survival outcomes comparable to those with adjuvant HT alone among elderly patients treated with lumpectomy.
We searched the National Cancer Database (2010-2014) for healthy women (aged ≥70 years, Charlson/Deyo [CD] score 0-1) with T1N0 hormone-receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and adjuvant HT or RT. Propensity scores were used to match patients for analysis.
We identified 2995 patients (median age, 78 years), most (81%) with a CD score of 0, clinical stage IA (77%), of whom 65% received HT alone and 35% received RT only after lumpectomy. On multivariate analysis of the matched cohort, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.13; P < .001), CD score 1 (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.37-2.70; P = .0002), and living in a metropolitan (vs urban) area (HR 3.09; 95% CI 1.43-6.67; P = .004) were associated with inferior overall survival (OS), whereas treatment with HT (vs RT) was not (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.85-1.49; P = .406). At a median follow-up of 45 months, no difference was found in OS between HT versus RT cohorts (85% and 86%, respectively; P = .44).
For healthy, older women with biologically favorable breast cancer treated with lumpectomy, adjuvant RT or HT is associated with equivalent 5-year OS rates. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to explore these adjuvant monotherapy options in elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
对于早期生物学特征良好的乳腺癌老年女性,正在考虑减少辅助治疗。尽管在某些情况下可以省略放射治疗(RT),但激素治疗(HT)的毒性不容忽视,且依从率存在差异。我们假设对于接受保乳术治疗的老年患者,单独使用辅助 RT 可产生与单独使用辅助 HT 相当的生存结果。
我们在国家癌症数据库(2010-2014 年)中搜索了接受保乳术和辅助 HT 或 RT 治疗的 T1N0 激素受体阳性、HER-2 阴性乳腺癌的健康女性(年龄≥70 岁,Charlson/Deyo[CD]评分 0-1)。采用倾向评分进行匹配分析。
我们确定了 2995 名患者(中位年龄 78 岁),大多数(81%)患者的 CD 评分为 0,临床分期为 IA(77%),其中 65%单独接受 HT,35%仅在保乳术后接受 RT。在匹配队列的多变量分析中,年龄较大(风险比[HR]1.10;95%置信区间[CI]1.07-1.13;P<.001)、CD 评分 1(HR 1.92;95%CI 1.37-2.70;P=0.0002)和居住在大都市(vs 城区)地区(HR 3.09;95%CI 1.43-6.67;P=0.004)与整体生存(OS)较差相关,而接受 HT(vs RT)治疗则无差异(HR 1.13;95%CI 0.85-1.49;P=0.406)。在中位随访 45 个月时,HT 与 RT 队列之间的 OS 无差异(分别为 85%和 86%;P=0.44)。
对于接受保乳术治疗的生物学特征良好的老年健康女性,辅助 RT 或 HT 与相当的 5 年 OS 率相关。有必要进行随机对照试验来探索这些老年激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的辅助单药治疗选择。