• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血小板计数与脾直径比值及其他非侵入性标志物作为肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张的预测指标

Platelet count to splenic diameter ratio and other noninvasive markers as predictors of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis.

作者信息

Jamil Zubia, Malik Maryam, Durrani Asghar Aurangzeb

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Foundation University Medical College, Foundation University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;28(5):347-352. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2017.17090. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

DOI:10.5152/tjg.2017.17090
PMID:28776495
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopy as a screening modality for esophageal varices is becoming difficult because of its invasiveness, cost, and increased burden of liver cirrhosis. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of simple and noninvasive markers in detecting esophageal varices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four variables (platelet count, portal vein diameter, splenic diameter, and ratio of platelet count to splenic diameter PC/SD] ratio) were studied in 150 cirrhotic patients. Endoscopy was performed to detect esophageal varices in the patients. The diagnostic accuracy of these variables was determined by obtaining area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The cutoff value of each variable and its sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were obtained using the Youden index. Pairwise comparison of these variables was performed using the Hanley and McNeil method to determine the most reliable screening tool among them.

RESULTS

The PC/SD ratio was the most reliable indicator for the presence of varices: AUC=0.9 (p<0.0001; cutoff value, ≤1077.42; sensitivity, 88.75%; specificity, 81.43%). The AUC for platelets and splenic diameter was 0.85 (p<0.0001) and 0.77 (p<0.0001), respectively, showing they were also good indicators. The portal vein diameter was not a good predictor for esophageal varices (AUC=0.59). Pairwise comparison of these variables showed that the PC/SD ratio is statistically significant for predicting esophageal varices among these markers (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The PC/SD ratio is found to be the most reliable marker to prognosticate esophageal varices. It is easy to obtain and can be used with other markers to identify the high-risk patients for developing esophageal varices. It will definitely reduce the need for endoscopy as screening purposes and lower the medical expenditures.

摘要

背景/目的:由于内镜检查具有侵入性、成本高以及肝硬化负担加重等问题,将其作为食管静脉曲张的筛查方式正变得困难。本研究旨在确定简单且无创的标志物检测食管静脉曲张的诊断准确性。

材料与方法

对150例肝硬化患者研究了四个变量(血小板计数、门静脉直径、脾直径以及血小板计数与脾直径之比[PC/SD比值])。对患者进行内镜检查以检测食管静脉曲张。通过获取受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)来确定这些变量的诊断准确性。使用尤登指数获得每个变量的截断值及其敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性和阴性似然比。使用汉利和麦克尼尔方法对这些变量进行两两比较,以确定其中最可靠的筛查工具。

结果

PC/SD比值是静脉曲张存在的最可靠指标:AUC = 0.9(p < 0.0001;截断值,≤1077.42;敏感性,88.75%;特异性,81.43%)。血小板和脾直径的AUC分别为0.85(p < 0.0001)和0.77(p < 0.0001),表明它们也是良好指标。门静脉直径不是食管静脉曲张的良好预测指标(AUC = 0.59)。这些变量的两两比较表明,PC/SD比值在预测这些标志物中的食管静脉曲张方面具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。

结论

发现PC/SD比值是预测食管静脉曲张最可靠的标志物。它易于获取,可与其他标志物一起用于识别发生食管静脉曲张的高危患者。这肯定会减少作为筛查目的的内镜检查需求并降低医疗费用。

相似文献

1
Platelet count to splenic diameter ratio and other noninvasive markers as predictors of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis.血小板计数与脾直径比值及其他非侵入性标志物作为肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张的预测指标
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;28(5):347-352. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2017.17090. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
2
Accuracy of non-endoscopic predictors of oesophageal varices in liver cirrhosis using platelet count, splenic size and portal vein diameter.利用血小板计数、脾脏大小和门静脉直径预测肝硬化食管静脉曲张的非内镜检查指标的准确性
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2016 Sep;45(3):243-251.
3
Ratio of platelet count/spleen diameter predicted the presence of esophageal varices in patients with schistosomiasis liver cirrhosis.血小板计数/脾脏直径比值可预测血吸虫病肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张的存在。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;28(5):588-91. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000584.
4
Elastography, spleen size, and platelet count identify portal hypertension in patients with compensated cirrhosis.弹性成像、脾脏大小和血小板计数可用于诊断代偿性肝硬化患者的门静脉高压。
Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):102-111.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
5
Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio to predict esophageal varices in Mexican patients with hepatic cirrhosis.血小板计数/脾脏直径比值预测墨西哥肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张情况
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 28;20(8):2079-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i8.2079.
6
Significance of Non-Invasive Markers as Predictor of Esophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis.非侵入性标志物作为肝硬化食管静脉曲张预测指标的意义
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2017 Oct-Dec;56(208):412-6.
7
Utilization of platelet count spleen diameter ratio in predicting the presence of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.血小板计数脾直径比值在预测肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张中的应用。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;44(2):146-50. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181a745ff.
8
Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio for non-invasive prediction of high risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.血小板计数/脾脏直径比值对肝硬化患者高危食管静脉曲张的无创预测。
Ann Hepatol. 2009 Oct-Dec;8(4):325-30.
9
[Noninvasive diagnosis of esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients].[肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张的无创诊断]
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2014 Jun;44(2):108-13.
10
Platelet count/splenic size ratio: a parameter to predict the presence of esophageal varices in cirrhotics.血小板计数/脾脏大小比值:预测肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张存在情况的一个参数。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006 Mar;16(3):183-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of machine learning models to predict esophagogastric variceal rebleeding risk in HBV-related cirrhosis after endoscopic treatment: a prospective multicenter study.预测内镜治疗后乙肝相关肝硬化患者食管胃静脉曲张再出血风险的机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项前瞻性多中心研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 20;87:103436. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103436. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Platelet counts to spleen diameter ratio: A promising noninvasive tool for predicting esophageal varices in cirrhosis patients.血小板计数与脾脏直径比值:一种预测肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张的有前景的非侵入性工具。
World J Hepatol. 2024 Oct 27;16(10):1177-1187. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i10.1177.
3
Predictive value of platelets-to-spleen diameter ratio for esophagogastric varices in hepatitis B virus-induced cirrhosis.
血小板与脾脏直径比值对乙型肝炎病毒所致肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张的预测价值
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Aug 15;16(8):3769-3777. doi: 10.62347/XQUE3108. eCollection 2024.
4
Accuracy of non-invasive diagnosis of esophageal varices among cirrhotic patients in a low-income setting.低收入环境下肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张无创诊断的准确性
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 3;9(12):e23229. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23229. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Prediction of Esophageal Varices in Viral Hepatitis C Cirrhosis: Performance of Combined Ultrasonography and Clinical Predictors.丙型病毒性肝炎肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张的预测:超声检查与临床预测指标联合应用的效能
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2023 Sep 15;2023:7938732. doi: 10.1155/2023/7938732. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of Liver Stiffness Measurement by Means of 2D-SWE for the Diagnosis of Esophageal Varices.二维剪切波弹性成像评估肝脏硬度测量在食管静脉曲张诊断中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;13(3):356. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030356.
7
Child-Pugh Score, MELD Score and Glasgow Blatchford Score to Predict the In-Hospital Outcome of Portal Hypertensive Patients Presenting with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Experience from Tertiary Healthcare System.采用儿童-普奇评分、终末期肝病模型评分和格拉斯哥布莱奇福德评分预测上消化道出血门静脉高压患者的院内结局:来自三级医疗保健系统的经验
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 9;11(22):6654. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226654.
8
Non-Invasive Prediction Models for Esophageal Varices and Red Signs in Patients With Hepatitis B Virus-Related Liver Cirrhosis.乙型肝炎病毒相关肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张和红色征的非侵入性预测模型
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Jul 12;9:930762. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.930762. eCollection 2022.
9
The magnitude and correlates of esophageal Varices among newly diagnosed cirrhotic patients undergoing screening fibre optic endoscope before incident bleeding in North-Western Tanzania; a cross-sectional study.坦桑尼亚西北部新诊断肝硬化患者在发生出血前接受纤维光学内窥镜筛查时食管静脉曲张的严重程度及其相关因素;一项横断面研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1123-9.