• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线上与线下微型行人街道评估 (MAPS) 比较:替代方法的可靠性。

Online versus in-person comparison of Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) assessments: reliability of alternate methods.

机构信息

School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Health Geogr. 2017 Aug 4;16(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0101-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12942-017-0101-0
PMID:28778205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5545045/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An online version of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (Abbreviated) tool was adapted to virtually audit built environment features supportive of physical activity. The current study assessed inter-rater reliability of MAPS Online between in-person raters and online raters unfamiliar with the regions.

METHODS

In-person and online audits were conducted for a total of 120 quarter-mile routes (60 per site) in Phoenix, AZ and San Diego, CA. Routes in each city included 40 residential origins stratified by walkability and SES, and 20 commercial centers. In-person audits were conducted by raters residing in their region. Online audits were conducted by raters in the alternate location using Google Maps (Aerial and Street View) images. The MAPS Abbreviated Online tool consisted of four sections: overall route, street segments, crossings and cul-de-sacs. Items within each section were grouped into subscales, and inter-rater reliability (ICCs) was assessed for subscales at multiple levels of aggregation.

RESULTS

Online and in-person audits showed excellent agreement for overall positive microscale (ICC = 0.86, 95% CI [0.80, 0.90]) and grand scores (ICC = 0.93, 95% CI [0.89, 0.95]). Substantial to near-perfect agreement was found for 21 of 30 (70%) subscales, valence, and subsection scores, with ICCs ranging from 0.62, 95% CI [0.50, 0.72] to 0.95, 95% CI [0.93, 0.97]. Lowest agreement was found for the aesthetics and social characteristics scores, with ICCs ranging from 0.07, 95% CI [-0.12, 0.24] to 0.27, 95% CI [0.10, 0.43].

CONCLUSIONS

Results support use of the MAPS Abbreviated Online tool to reliably assess microscale neighborhood features that support physical activity and may be used by raters residing in different geographic regions and unfamiliar with the audit areas.

摘要

背景

对行人街道景观的微观尺度审计(简称)工具的在线版本进行了改编,以便对支持身体活动的建筑环境特征进行虚拟审计。本研究评估了在不熟悉地区的在线评估者与现场评估者之间 MAPS Online 的内部评估者可靠性。

方法

在亚利桑那州凤凰城和加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥共进行了 120 条四分之一英里的路线(每个地点 60 条)的现场和在线审计。每个城市的路线包括 40 个根据步行能力和 SES 划分的住宅起源,以及 20 个商业中心。现场审计由居住在其地区的评估者进行。在线审计由居住在另一个地点的评估者使用谷歌地图(航空和街景)图像进行。MAPS 缩写在线工具由四个部分组成:整体路线、街道段、交叉口和死胡同。每个部分内的项目分为子量表,并且在多个聚合级别评估了子量表的内部评估者可靠性(ICC)。

结果

在线和现场审计在整体积极微观尺度(ICC=0.86,95%CI[0.80,0.90])和总评分(ICC=0.93,95%CI[0.89,0.95])方面显示出极好的一致性。21 个子量表中的 30 个(70%)、 valence 和子部分评分显示出实质性到近乎完美的一致性,ICC 范围从 0.62,95%CI[0.50,0.72]到 0.95,95%CI[0.93,0.97]。美学和社会特征评分的一致性最低,ICC 范围从 0.07,95%CI[-0.12,0.24]到 0.27,95%CI[0.10,0.43]。

结论

结果支持使用 MAPS 缩写在线工具可靠地评估支持身体活动的微观邻里特征,并且可以由居住在不同地理区域且不熟悉审计区域的评估者使用。

相似文献

1
Online versus in-person comparison of Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) assessments: reliability of alternate methods.线上与线下微型行人街道评估 (MAPS) 比较:替代方法的可靠性。
Int J Health Geogr. 2017 Aug 4;16(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0101-0.
2
Reliability of streetscape audits comparing on-street and online observations: MAPS-Global in 5 countries.街道景观审计的可靠性比较:在五个国家的 MAPS-Global 项目中进行的街边观察和在线观察。
Int J Health Geogr. 2021 Jan 28;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12942-021-00261-5.
3
Reliability between online raters with varying familiarities of a region: Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS).不同地区熟悉程度的在线评估者之间的可靠性:步行街景观微观尺度审计(MAPS)。
Landsc Urban Plan. 2017 Nov;167:240-248. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
Assessing the micro-scale environment using Google Street View: the Virtual Systematic Tool for Evaluating Pedestrian Streetscapes (Virtual-STEPS).利用谷歌街景评估微观环境:虚拟系统评估行人街道景观工具(Virtual-STEPS)。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 10;19(1):1246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7460-3.
5
Development and reliability of a streetscape observation instrument for international use: MAPS-global.用于国际使用的街景观察工具的开发和可靠性:MAPS-global。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Feb 26;15(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0650-z.
6
International evaluation of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) Global instrument: comparative assessment between local and remote online observers.国际行人街道环境微观评估(MAPS)全球工具评估:本地和远程在线观察员的比较评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jun 30;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01146-3.
7
Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS).行人街道微尺度评估量表(MAPS)的编制、评分和信度。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 27;13:403. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-403.
8
Inter-rater reliability of streetscape audits using online observations: Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) global in Japan.使用在线观测进行街道景观审计的评分者间信度:日本的全球行人街道景观微观审计(MAPS)
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Nov 7;30:102043. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102043. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Contribution of streetscape audits to explanation of physical activity in four age groups based on the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS).基于步行街微观尺度审计(MAPS)的街道景观审计对四个年龄组身体活动解释的贡献。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;116:82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.042. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
10
Using an audit tool (MAPS Global) to assess the characteristics of the physical environment related to walking for transport in youth: reliability of Belgian data.使用一种审计工具(MAPS全球)评估与青少年步行出行相关的物理环境特征:比利时数据的可靠性。
Int J Health Geogr. 2016 Nov 15;15(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12942-016-0069-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual Assessment of Physical Activity-Related Built Environment in Soweto, South Africa: What Is the Role of Contextual Familiarity?南非索韦托与体育活动相关的建成环境的虚拟评估:情境熟悉度的作用是什么?
J Urban Health. 2024 Dec;101(6):1221-1234. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00914-3. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
2
Using Google Street View for virtual observations of neighborhoods and dwelling units: A feasibility study.利用谷歌街景进行邻里和居住单元的虚拟观察:一项可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0307272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307272. eCollection 2024.
3
Inter-rater reliability of streetscape audits using online observations: Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) global in Japan.使用在线观测进行街道景观审计的评分者间信度:日本的全球行人街道景观微观审计(MAPS)
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Nov 7;30:102043. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102043. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Training Computers to See the Built Environment Related to Physical Activity: Detection of Microscale Walkability Features Using Computer Vision.训练计算机识别与体力活动相关的建成环境:使用计算机视觉检测微观步行环境特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 9;19(8):4548. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084548.
5
Validation of desk-based audits using Google Street View to monitor the obesogenic potential of neighbourhoods in a pediatric sample: a pilot study in the QUALITY cohort.利用谷歌街景对儿科样本中邻里致肥胖环境潜力进行基于桌面的审核验证:QUALITY 队列中的一项试点研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2022 Mar 26;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12942-022-00301-8.
6
Socioeconomic and racial disparities of sidewalk quality in a traditional rust belt city.一个传统铁锈地带城市人行道质量的社会经济和种族差异。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Nov 19;16:100975. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100975. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Using universal kriging to improve neighborhood physical disorder measurement.使用泛克里金法改进邻里物理环境无序度测量。
Sociol Methods Res. 2020 Nov 1;49(4):1163-1185. doi: 10.1177/0049124118769103. Epub 2018 May 6.
8
International evaluation of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) Global instrument: comparative assessment between local and remote online observers.国际行人街道环境微观评估(MAPS)全球工具评估:本地和远程在线观察员的比较评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jun 30;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01146-3.
9
Microscale walkability indicators for fifty-nine European central urban areas: An open-access tabular dataset and a geospatial web-based platform.欧洲59个中心城市地区的微观尺度步行适宜性指标:一个开放获取的表格数据集和一个基于网络地理空间的平台。
Data Brief. 2021 Apr 21;36:107048. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107048. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Study protocol: health survey of Sao Paulo: ISA-Physical Activity and Environment.研究方案:圣保罗健康调查:ISA-身体活动与环境。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10262-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing and Validating an Abbreviated Version of the Microscale Audit for Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS-Abbreviated).开发并验证《步行街景观微观尺度审核简版》(MAPS-简版)
J Transp Health. 2017 Jun;5:84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
Reliability between online raters with varying familiarities of a region: Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS).不同地区熟悉程度的在线评估者之间的可靠性:步行街景观微观尺度审计(MAPS)。
Landsc Urban Plan. 2017 Nov;167:240-248. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
3
Using an audit tool (MAPS Global) to assess the characteristics of the physical environment related to walking for transport in youth: reliability of Belgian data.使用一种审计工具(MAPS全球)评估与青少年步行出行相关的物理环境特征:比利时数据的可靠性。
Int J Health Geogr. 2016 Nov 15;15(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12942-016-0069-1.
4
Assessing Walking and Cycling Environments in the Streets of Madrid: Comparing On-Field and Virtual Audits.评估马德里街道的步行和骑行环境:实地审计与虚拟审计的比较
J Urban Health. 2015 Oct;92(5):923-39. doi: 10.1007/s11524-015-9982-z.
5
Is Your Neighborhood Designed to Support Physical Activity? A Brief Streetscape Audit Tool.你的社区是否适合支持体育活动?一种简要的街道景观审计工具。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Sep 3;12:E141. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150098.
6
Co-benefits of designing communities for active living: an exploration of literature.为积极生活设计社区的协同效益:文献综述
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 28;12:30. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0188-2.
7
Geoprocessing via google maps for assessing obesogenic built environments related to physical activity and chronic noncommunicable diseases: validity and reliability.通过谷歌地图进行地理处理以评估与身体活动和慢性非传染性疾病相关的致肥胖建筑环境:有效性和可靠性
J Healthc Eng. 2015;6(1):41-54. doi: 10.1260/2040-2295.6.1.41.
8
Development and deployment of the Computer Assisted Neighborhood Visual Assessment System (CANVAS) to measure health-related neighborhood conditions.开发和部署计算机辅助邻里视觉评估系统(CANVAS)以测量与健康相关的邻里环境状况。
Health Place. 2015 Jan;31:163-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
9
The SPOTLIGHT virtual audit tool: a valid and reliable tool to assess obesogenic characteristics of the built environment.聚光灯虚拟审计工具:一种评估建筑环境致胖特征的有效且可靠的工具。
Int J Health Geogr. 2014 Dec 16;13:52. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-52.
10
The Wisconsin Assessment of the Social and Built Environment (WASABE): a multi-dimensional objective audit instrument for examining neighborhood effects on health.威斯康星社会与建成环境评估(WASABE):一种用于检验邻里环境对健康影响的多维度客观审计工具。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 13;14:1165. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1165.