KU Leuven, Department of Kinesiology, Physical Activity, Sports and Health Research Group, Belgium.
University of Jyväskylä, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Neuromuscular Research Center, Finland.
Exp Gerontol. 2017 Nov;98:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Research underlines the potential of low-load resistance exercise in older adults. However, while the effects of detraining from high-load protocols have been established, it is not known whether gains from low-load training would be better/worse maintained. The current study evaluated the effects of 24weeks of detraining that followed 12weeks of high- and low-load resistance exercise in older adults. Fifty-six older adults (68.0±5.0years) were randomly assigned to leg press and leg extension training at either HIGH load (2×10-15 repetitions at 80% of one-repetition maximum (1-RM)), LOW load (1×80-100 repetitions at 20% of 1-RM), or LOW+ load (1×60 repetitions at 20% of 1-RM, immediately followed by 1×10-20 repetitions at 40% 1-RM). All protocols ended with volitional fatigue. The main outcome measures included mid-thigh muscle volume, leg press 1-RM, leg extension isometric and isokinetic strength, and functional performance. Tests were performed at baseline, post-intervention and after 24weeks of detraining. Results show no effect of load on preservation of muscle volume, which returned to baseline after detraining. Training-induced gains in functional capacity and isometric strength were maintained, independent of load. HIGH and LOW+ were more beneficial than LOW for long-lasting gains in training-specific 1-RM. To conclude, gains in muscle volume are reversed after 24weeks of detraining, independent of load. This emphasises the need for long-term resistance exercise adherence. The magnitude of detraining in neuromuscular and functional adaptations was similar between groups. These findings underline the value of low-load resistance exercise in older age. Clinical Trial Registration NCT01707017.
研究强调了低负荷阻力训练在老年人中的潜力。然而,虽然已经确定了从高负荷方案中停训的效果,但尚不清楚低负荷训练的收益是否能更好/更差地维持。本研究评估了在老年人中进行 12 周高负荷和低负荷阻力训练后,进行 24 周停训的效果。56 名老年人(68.0±5.0 岁)被随机分配到腿推和腿伸训练,负荷分别为高(2×10-15 次重复,80%的 1 次重复最大重量(1-RM))、低(1×80-100 次重复,20%的 1-RM)或低+(1×60 次重复,20%的 1-RM,随后立即进行 1×10-20 次重复,40%的 1-RM)。所有方案均以自愿疲劳结束。主要观察指标包括大腿中段肌肉量、腿推 1-RM、腿伸等长和等速力量以及功能表现。测试在基线、干预后和 24 周停训后进行。结果显示,负荷对肌肉量的保持没有影响,停训后肌肉量恢复到基线水平。功能能力和等长强度的训练诱导增益得以维持,与负荷无关。HIGH 和 LOW+比 LOW 更有利于持久提高特定训练的 1-RM。总之,停训 24 周后,肌肉量的增加会逆转,与负荷无关。这强调了长期进行抗阻运动的必要性。各组之间神经肌肉和功能适应的停训幅度相似。这些发现强调了低负荷抗阻运动在老年中的价值。临床试验注册号 NCT01707017。