The Robert Larner M.D. College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, 144 N Union St. Apt. 1, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Ave, Mailstop 320FL4, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):923-929. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5767-7. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
Recent data suggest a wide range of conversion (4.9-20%) from laparoscopic (LC) to open cholecystectomy (OC) despite increasing surgeon familiarity and superior equipment. Previously identified risk factors for conversion include increased age, male gender, diabetes, and emergent surgeries. Recent studies also suggest that formal minimally invasive surgical training (MIST) reduces conversion rates. We sought to determine conversion rates in our population, a rural academic medical center, and identify any significant risks for conversion.
We conducted a single-center retrospective review of 2810 cholecystectomies performed over a seven-year period (2009-2016).
Our study included 837 (29.8%) males and 1973 (70.2%) females with a mean age of 49.2 years. Forty-two percent of cases were done by surgeons with MIST. A total of 139 (4.95%) cases were converted to OC. Univariate predictors of conversion to OC included male gender, age ≥65, urgent and emergent admissions, and MIST of the surgeon. In multivariate modeling, which included significant univariate predictors of conversion, independent predictors of conversion to OC included urgent or emergent admission, male gender, and age ≥65. MIST status was no longer a significant predictor.
Our conversion rate from LC to OC falls within the lower range of recently published rates. This is likely multifactorial, and reflects increasing familiarity of the laparoscopic technique, improved quality of laparoscopic equipment, and/or prior knowledge of preoperative risk factors for conversion. Our results, consistent with previous literature, show a reduced conversion rate among surgeons with MIST. This finding, albeit not significant on multivariate analysis, may offer insight into a potential alterable preoperative risk factor for conversion and warrants further research. Further knowledge about the impact MIST has on conversion may provide a feasible preoperative approach to reducing conversion to OC, thereby reducing costs and overall patient morbidity.
尽管外科医生的经验越来越丰富,设备也越来越先进,但最近的数据显示,腹腔镜(LC)到开腹胆囊切除术(OC)的转换率范围很广(4.9%-20%)。以前确定的转换风险因素包括年龄增加、男性、糖尿病和紧急手术。最近的研究还表明,正规的微创外科培训(MIST)可以降低转换率。我们试图确定我们所在的农村学术医疗中心的人群中的转换率,并确定任何显著的转换风险因素。
我们对一个七年内(2009-2016 年)进行的 2810 例胆囊切除术进行了单中心回顾性研究。
我们的研究包括 837 例(29.8%)男性和 1973 例(70.2%)女性,平均年龄为 49.2 岁。42%的病例由接受过 MIST 的外科医生完成。共有 139 例(4.95%)患者转为 OC。OC 转换的单变量预测因素包括男性、年龄≥65 岁、紧急和紧急入院以及外科医生的 MIST。在包括 OC 转换的显著单变量预测因素的多变量建模中,OC 转换的独立预测因素包括紧急或紧急入院、男性和年龄≥65 岁。MIST 状态不再是一个显著的预测因素。
我们从 LC 到 OC 的转换率处于最近发表的比率的较低范围。这可能是多因素的,反映了腹腔镜技术的熟悉程度不断提高、腹腔镜设备质量的提高,以及/或术前转换风险因素的预先认识。我们的结果与以前的文献一致,表明接受 MIST 的外科医生的转换率降低。尽管在多变量分析中不显著,但这一发现可能为潜在的可改变的术前转换风险因素提供了一些见解,值得进一步研究。进一步了解 MIST 对转换的影响,可能为降低 OC 的转换提供一种可行的术前方法,从而降低成本和整体患者发病率。