Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):522-529. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4987-5. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
To evaluate percutaneous brush cytology, forceps biopsy and a tandem procedure consisting of both, in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstruction.
A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent biliary brush cytology and/or forceps biopsy between 01/2010 and 09/2014 was performed. The cytology and pathology results were compared to the composite outcome (including radiological, pathological and clinical data). Cost for tandem procedure compared to brush cytology and forceps biopsy alone was calculated.
A total of 232 interventions in 129 patients (70.8 ± 11.0 years) were included. Composite outcome showed malignancy in 94/129 (72.9%) patients. Sensitivity for brush cytology, forceps biopsy and tandem procedure was 40.6% (95% CI 32.6-48.7%), 42.7% (32.4-53.0%) and 55.8% (44.7-66.9%) with 100% specificity, respectively. There were 9/43 (20.9%) additional cancers diagnosed when forceps biopsy was performed in addition to brush cytology, while there were 13/43 (30.2%) more cancers diagnosed when brush cytology was performed in addition to forceps biopsy. Additional costs per additionally diagnosed malignancy if tandem approach is to be utilised in all cases was $704.96.
Using brush cytology and forceps biopsy in tandem improves sensitivity compared to brush cytology and forceps biopsy alone in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstruction.
• Tandem procedure improves sensitivity compared to brush cytology and forceps biopsy. • Brush cytology may help to overcome "crush artefacts" from forceps biopsy. • The cost per diagnosed malignancy may warrant tandem procedure in all patients.
评估经皮刷检细胞学、活检钳活检以及两者联合的串联程序在恶性胆道梗阻诊断中的作用。
对 2010 年 1 月至 2014 年 9 月间连续接受胆道刷检和/或活检钳活检的患者进行回顾性分析。将细胞学和病理学结果与综合结果(包括影像学、病理学和临床资料)进行比较。计算串联程序与单独刷检和活检钳活检相比的成本。
共纳入 129 例患者(70.8±11.0 岁)的 232 次介入操作。综合结果显示 94/129(72.9%)例患者为恶性。刷检、活检钳活检和串联程序的敏感性分别为 40.6%(95%CI 32.6-48.7%)、42.7%(32.4-53.0%)和 55.8%(44.7-66.9%),特异性均为 100%。在联合刷检和活检钳活检时,额外诊断出 9/43(20.9%)例癌症,而在联合活检钳活检时,额外诊断出 13/43(30.2%)例癌症。如果所有病例都采用串联方法,则额外诊断出每例癌症的额外成本为 704.96 美元。
与单独使用刷检和活检钳活检相比,联合使用刷检和活检钳活检可提高恶性胆道梗阻诊断的敏感性。
串联程序可提高诊断恶性胆道梗阻的敏感性,优于单独使用刷检和活检钳活检。
刷检可能有助于克服活检钳活检产生的“挤压伪影”。
每诊断出一例癌症的成本可能使串联程序在所有患者中都具有合理性。