Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7050, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Farming in Balance, Franzengatan 6, 105 33, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ambio. 2018 Feb;47(1):45-56. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0935-5. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
Diffuse phosphorus (P) losses from arable land need to be reduced in a cost-efficient way, taking into account their temporal and spatial variability. This study, based on 16 farms across southern Sweden, examined possibilities for identifying critical source areas for P losses based on the combined results of high-resolution erosion modelling, independent risk assessments by farmers, soil survey and SWOT analysis performed by farmers. Statistically significant differences in dissolved P release were found between soil P test classes in the studied area, whereas soil textural classes and not P content governed potential mobilisation of soil particles and unreactive P. Spatial comparison of problem areas identified by farmers and modelled features showed that the modelled erosion pathways intersected 109 in a total of 128 (85%) observed problem areas. The study demonstrates the value in involving farmers in the identification of critical source areas in order to select and support implementation of effective countermeasures.
需要以具有成本效益的方式减少耕地中弥散性磷(P)的流失,同时考虑到其时空变异性。本研究基于瑞典南部的 16 个农场,通过综合运用高分辨率侵蚀模型、农民独立风险评估、土壤调查和农民进行的 SWOT 分析,研究了基于综合结果确定 P 流失关键源区的可能性。在所研究的地区,土壤 P 测试类别之间发现了溶解 P 释放的统计学显著差异,而土壤质地类别而非 P 含量控制了土壤颗粒的潜在迁移和非反应性 P。农民确定的问题区域和模型特征的空间比较表明,模型化的侵蚀路径在总共 128 个(85%)观察到的问题区域中交汇了 109 个。本研究证明了让农民参与确定关键源区以选择和支持实施有效对策的价值。