Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy.
Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;16(1):39-48.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.07.041. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux are highly prevalent in the general population, but they are believed to be separate entities. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of dyspepsia in individuals with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (GERS), and to quantify overlap between the disorders.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EMBASE Classic databases to identify population-based studies reporting the prevalence of dyspepsia and GERS in adults, defined using specific symptom-based criteria or based on answers to questionnaires. We calculated pooled prevalence values, according to study location and criteria used to define weekly GERS or dyspepsia, as well as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. The degree of overlap between dyspepsia and GERS was examined.
Of 14,132 papers evaluated, 79 reported prevalence of weekly GERS. Nineteen of these study populations, comprising 111,459 participants, also reported the proportion of individuals with dyspepsia. The prevalence of dyspepsia in individuals with weekly GERS was 43.9% (95% CI, 35.1%-52.9%). The pooled OR for dyspepsia in individuals with weekly GERS, compared with those without, was 6.94 (95% CI, 4.33%-11.1%). The OR for dyspepsia in individuals with weekly GERS was significantly higher in all geographical regions studied and for all diagnostic criteria. The pooled degree of overlap between dyspepsia and GERS was 25.9% (95% CI, 19.9%-32.4%).
The odds of dyspepsia in individuals with weekly GERS is almost 7-fold that of individuals without GERS; dyspepsia and GERS overlap in more than 25% of individuals. Reasons for this remain speculative, but might include shared pathophysiological mechanisms or residual confounding factors. However, patients with GERS should be questioned about coexistent dyspepsia, to optimize treatment approaches.
消化不良和胃食管反流在普通人群中非常普遍,但它们被认为是两种不同的疾病。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以估计胃食管反流症状(GERS)患者中消化不良的患病率,并定量评估这两种疾病之间的重叠程度。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 EMBASE Classic 数据库,以确定报告成年人消化不良和 GERS 患病率的基于人群的研究,这些研究使用特定的基于症状的标准或基于问卷回答来定义。我们根据研究地点和用于定义每周 GERS 或消化不良的标准,计算了 pooled 患病率值,以及 95%CI 置信区间内的比值比(OR)。还检查了消化不良和 GERS 之间的重叠程度。
在评估的 14132 篇论文中,有 79 篇报告了每周 GERS 的患病率。这些研究人群中有 19 项研究报告了患有消化不良的个体比例,共包括 111459 名参与者。每周 GERS 患者中消化不良的患病率为 43.9%(95%CI,35.1%-52.9%)。每周 GERS 患者发生消化不良的 pooled OR 与无 GERS 患者相比为 6.94(95%CI,4.33%-11.1%)。在所有研究的地理区域和所有诊断标准中,每周 GERS 患者发生消化不良的 OR 均显著升高。消化不良和 GERS 之间的 pooled 重叠程度为 25.9%(95%CI,19.9%-32.4%)。
每周 GERS 患者发生消化不良的几率是无 GERS 患者的近 7 倍;消化不良和 GERS 在超过 25%的个体中重叠。造成这种情况的原因仍在推测之中,但可能包括共同的病理生理机制或残留的混杂因素。然而,对于 GERS 患者,应该询问是否同时存在消化不良,以优化治疗方法。