• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估中的价值——评分标准的使用。

Values in evaluation - The use of rubrics.

作者信息

Dickinson Pauline, Adams Jeffery

机构信息

SHORE & Whariki Research Centre, College of Health, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2017 Dec;65:113-116. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.07.005
PMID:28783607
Abstract

Rubrics are used by evaluators who seek to move evaluations from being mere descriptions of an evaluand (i.e., the programme, project or policy to be evaluated) to determining the quality and success of the evaluand. However, a problem for evaluators interested in using rubrics is the literature relating to rubric development is scattered and mostly located in the education field with a particular focus on teaching and learning. In this short article we review and synthesise key points from the literature about rubrics to identify best practice. In addition we draw on our rubric teaching experience and our work with a range of stakeholders on a range of evaluation projects to develop evaluation criteria and rubrics. Our intention is to make this information readily available and to provide guidance to evaluators who wish to use rubrics to make value judgements as to the quality and success of evaluands.

摘要

评估者使用评分标准,旨在将评估从仅仅对被评估对象(即待评估的项目、计划或政策)的描述,转变为确定被评估对象的质量和成功程度。然而,对于有兴趣使用评分标准的评估者来说,一个问题是,与评分标准制定相关的文献分散,且大多集中在教育领域,特别关注教学。在这篇短文中,我们回顾并综合了文献中关于评分标准的要点,以确定最佳实践。此外,我们借鉴了我们的评分标准教学经验,以及我们与一系列利益相关者在一系列评估项目中制定评估标准和评分标准的工作。我们的目的是使这些信息易于获取,并为希望使用评分标准对被评估对象的质量和成功程度做出价值判断的评估者提供指导。

相似文献

1
Values in evaluation - The use of rubrics.评估中的价值——评分标准的使用。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Dec;65:113-116. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
2
How program evaluators use and learn to use rubrics to make evaluative reasoning explicit.项目评估人员如何使用以及学习使用评分标准来使评估推理变得明确。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Aug;69:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Rubrics 101: a primer for rubric development in dental education.评分标准 101:牙科教育中评分标准制定的入门指南。
J Dent Educ. 2011 Sep;75(9):1163-75.
4
The use of assessment rubrics to enhance feedback in higher education: An integrative literature review.评估量表在高等教育反馈中的应用:综合文献综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct;69:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
5
Human patient simulation evaluation rubrics for nursing education: measuring the Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice.人文学科患者模拟评估量表在护理教育中的应用:衡量护理专业学士学位教育的基本要素。
J Nurs Educ. 2011 Nov;50(11):605-11. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20110715-01. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
6
Assessing a Capstone Research Project in Medical Training: Examiner Consistency Using Generic Versus Domain-Specific Rubrics.评估医学培训中的顶点研究项目:使用通用评分标准与特定领域评分标准时考官的一致性
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Feb 24;9:23821205221081813. doi: 10.1177/23821205221081813. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning.实践中的评估标准:对发表于《评估与项目规划》的评估分析结果
Eval Program Plann. 2023 Apr;97:102226. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102226. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
8
Validation of rubric-based evaluation for bachelor's theses in a food science and technology degree.基于纲要的食品科学与技术学位本科论文评估方法的验证。
J Food Sci. 2024 May;89(5):3129-3138. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17044. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
9
Rubrics for clinical evaluation: objectifying the subjective experience.临床评估标准:使主观体验客观化。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2009 Mar;9(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
10
Assumption-aware tools and agency; an interrogation of the primary artifacts of the program evaluation and design profession in working with complex evaluands and complex contexts.具备假设意识的工具与机构;对项目评估与设计专业在处理复杂评估对象和复杂情境时的主要工件进行审视。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:141-153. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a dynamic clinical assessment for finals.期末动态临床评估的制定。
Br Dent J. 2024 Nov;237(10):795-800. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-8028-x. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
Using rapid evaluation methods to assess service delivery changes: Lessons learned for evaluation practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.使用快速评估方法评估服务提供的变化:COVID-19大流行期间评估实践的经验教训。
Eval J Australas. 2022 Mar;22(1):30-48. doi: 10.1177/1035719X211057630.
3
Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Open Educational Resources for Learning.
用于评估学习开放教育资源的评分标准的验证
Behav Sci (Basel). 2019 Nov 25;9(12):126. doi: 10.3390/bs9120126.