Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤退伍军人的支持性就业:服务提供者的观点。

Supported Employment for Veterans With Traumatic Brain Injury: Provider Perspectives.

机构信息

Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA; Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care and National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Oregon Health and Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;99(2S):S14-S22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.029. Epub 2017 Aug 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify any pilot and nonpilot site differences regarding current (1) provision of supported employment (SE) to veterans with traumatic brain injury (TBI); (2) staffing and communication between the SE and polytrauma/TBI teams; and (3) provider perceptions on facilitators and barriers to providing, and suggestions for improving, SE.

DESIGN

Mixed methods cross-sectional survey study.

SETTING

Veterans Health Administration SE programs.

PARTICIPANTS

Respondents (N=144) included 54 SE supervisors and 90 vocational rehabilitation specialists.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Web-based surveys of forced-choice and open-ended items included questions on SE team characteristics, communication with polytrauma/TBI teams, and experiences with providing SE to veterans with TBI history.

RESULTS

SE was provided to veterans with TBI at 100% of pilot and 59.2% of nonpilot sites (P=.09). However, vocational rehabilitation specialists at pilot sites reported that communication with the polytrauma/TBI team about SE referrals was more frequent than at nonpilot sites (P=.003). In open-ended items, suggestions for improving SE were similar across pilot and nonpilot sites, and included increasing staffing for vocational rehabilitation specialists and case management, enhancing communication and education between SE and polytrauma/TBI teams, and expanding the scope of the SE program so that eligibility is based on employment support need, rather than diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings may contribute to an evidence base that informs SE research and clinical directions on service provision, resource allocation, team integration efforts, and outreach to veterans with TBI who have employment support needs.

摘要

目的

确定在当前情况下,试点和非试点地点在以下方面是否存在差异:(1)为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)退伍军人提供支持性就业(SE);(2)SE 与多发创伤/TBI 团队之间的人员配备和沟通;以及(3)提供者对提供 SE 的促进因素和障碍的看法,以及改进 SE 的建议。

设计

混合方法横断面调查研究。

地点

退伍军人健康管理局 SE 计划。

参与者

受访者(N=144)包括 54 名 SE 主管和 90 名职业康复专家。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

基于网络的强制性选择和开放式调查项目,包括关于 SE 团队特征、与多发创伤/TBI 团队沟通以及为有 TBI 病史的退伍军人提供 SE 经验的问题。

结果

SE 在 100%的试点和 59.2%的非试点地点提供给 TBI 退伍军人(P=.09)。然而,试点地点的职业康复专家报告说,与多发创伤/TBI 团队就 SE 转诊的沟通比非试点地点更频繁(P=.003)。在开放式项目中,试点和非试点地点对改善 SE 的建议相似,包括增加职业康复专家和案例管理的人员配备,加强 SE 和多发创伤/TBI 团队之间的沟通和教育,以及扩大 SE 计划的范围,使资格基于就业支持需求,而不是诊断。

结论

这些发现可能有助于为 SE 研究和临床方向提供依据,涉及服务提供、资源分配、团队整合努力以及为有就业支持需求的 TBI 退伍军人提供服务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验