State Key Lab of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao.
Faulty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jul;14(7):663-672. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
Traditional medicine (TM) and complementary medicine (CM) products have played an increasingly important role in the business of pharmacy for over two decades in a number of countries. With a focus on the quality use of all medicines including complementary medicines, there have been a number of initiatives to encourage the integration of TM/CM products into professional practice. Recent studies report that many of the barriers that prevent such integration remain.
To explore the pharmacists' perspective regarding how barriers to the integration of TM/CM products into the professional practice of pharmacy could be resolved.
Purposive sampling and snowballing were used to recruit 11 registered pharmacists who had worked in community pharmacy for a minimum of 6 months to participate in one of 3 focus groups. Focus group questions informed by previous studies, explored participants' perspectives on the actions required to support professional services related to TM/CM products.
Pharmacists proposed that five key stakeholders (professional pharmacy organizations, universities, government, pharmacy owners, and pharmacists) enact 4 developments that require a collaborative effort ("education and training", "building the evidence base", "developing reliable and accessible information resources", and "workplace support for best practice"). Manufacturers of TM/CM products were not identified by pharmacists as collaborators in these developments.
Collectively, the findings from this study support a strategic model to guide the integration of TM/CM products into the professional practice of pharmacy.
在许多国家,传统医学(TM)和补充医学(CM)产品在药房业务中已经发挥了二十多年越来越重要的作用。随着对包括补充药物在内的所有药物的合理使用的关注,已经采取了一些举措来鼓励将 TM/CM 产品纳入专业实践。最近的研究报告表明,许多阻碍这种整合的障碍仍然存在。
探讨药剂师对如何解决将 TM/CM 产品整合到药学专业实践中的障碍的看法。
采用目的性抽样和滚雪球抽样方法,招募了 11 名在社区药房工作至少 6 个月的注册药剂师,让他们参加了 3 个焦点小组中的一个。焦点小组问题是根据先前的研究设计的,探讨了参与者对支持与 TM/CM 产品相关的专业服务所需的行动的看法。
药剂师提出,有五个关键利益相关者(专业药房组织、大学、政府、药房所有者和药剂师)需要采取四项发展行动(“教育和培训”、“建立证据基础”、“开发可靠和易于获取的信息资源”和“为最佳实践提供工作场所支持”)。药剂师没有将 TM/CM 产品的制造商确定为这些发展的合作伙伴。
总的来说,这项研究的结果支持了一个战略模型,以指导 TM/CM 产品整合到药学专业实践中。