• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科患者 2 型心肌梗死的特征和发生情况:一项前瞻性研究。

Characteristics and occurrence of type 2 myocardial infarction in emergency department patients: a prospective study.

机构信息

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2018 Mar;35(3):169-175. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206869. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2017-206869
PMID:28784608
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify differences in prevalence, demographics, clinical features and outcomes for type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI) and type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) in a cohort of patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with chest pain.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of data collected from two prospective studies. Data were collected between November 2008 and February 2011 for the first study, and between February 2011 and March 2014 for the second. Participants were patients presenting to the ED with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The outcome was 30-day diagnosis; classified into T1MI, T2MI or non-MI. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the demographics, clinical history and presenting symptoms across diagnoses (T1MI, T2MI and non-MI). Cumulative mortality over 1 year was compared for T1MI and T2MI.

RESULTS

147 patients (6.3%; 95% CI 5.3% to 7.3%) were classified as T1MI and 52 (2.2%; 95% CI 1.7% to 2.9%) were classified as T2MI. T2MIs were more likely to be female (OR 4.71, 95% CI 2.28 to 9.76), have an abnormal but non-ischaemic ECG (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.45 to 6.00), report prior hypertension (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.35 to 6.12), have tachycardia (OR 9.26, 95% CI 3.08 to 30.77) and pain at rest (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.28 to 8.02) compared with T1MI. One-year mortality was similar between T1MI and T2MI (9% and 14.6%, respectively, p=0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

T2MIs comprised one quarter of all MIs diagnosed in the ED. Among patients presenting to the ED with symptoms of ACS, symptoms do not allow clinicians to reliably differentiate patients with T1MI and T2MI. Prior hypertension, tachycardia and abnormal non-ischaemic ECGs are seen more often in T2MI compared with T1MI. One-year mortality was substantial in patients with T1MI and T2MI, but low power precludes conclusions about mortality differences between groups.

摘要

目的

在因胸痛而到急诊科就诊的患者中,确定 1 型心肌梗死(T1MI)和 2 型心肌梗死(T2MI)的患病率、人口统计学特征、临床特征和结局的差异。

方法

这是对两项前瞻性研究数据进行的事后分析。第一项研究的数据收集时间为 2008 年 11 月至 2011 年 2 月,第二项研究的数据收集时间为 2011 年 2 月至 2014 年 3 月。研究对象为因疑似急性冠脉综合征(ACS)而到急诊科就诊的患者。结局为 30 天诊断;分为 T1MI、T2MI 或非 MI。使用描述性统计数据比较不同诊断(T1MI、T2MI 和非 MI)的人口统计学、临床病史和表现症状。比较 T1MI 和 T2MI 患者在 1 年内的累积死亡率。

结果

147 例患者(6.3%;95%置信区间 5.3%至 7.3%)被归类为 T1MI,52 例患者(2.2%;95%置信区间 1.7%至 2.9%)被归类为 T2MI。T2MI 更可能为女性(比值比 4.71,95%置信区间 2.28 至 9.76),心电图异常但非缺血性(比值比 2.95,95%置信区间 1.45 至 6.00),报告有既往高血压(比值比 2.83,95%置信区间 1.35 至 6.12),心动过速(比值比 9.26,95%置信区间 3.08 至 30.77)和静息时疼痛(比值比 3.04,95%置信区间 1.28 至 8.02),与 T1MI 相比。T1MI 和 T2MI 的 1 年死亡率相似(分别为 9%和 14.6%,p=0.37)。

结论

T2MI 占急诊科诊断的所有 MI 的四分之一。在因 ACS 症状而到急诊科就诊的患者中,症状不能让临床医生可靠地区分 T1MI 和 T2MI 患者。与 T1MI 相比,T2MI 中更常见既往高血压、心动过速和异常非缺血性心电图。T1MI 和 T2MI 患者的 1 年死亡率较高,但由于效能低,无法得出两组之间死亡率差异的结论。

相似文献

1
Characteristics and occurrence of type 2 myocardial infarction in emergency department patients: a prospective study.急诊科患者 2 型心肌梗死的特征和发生情况:一项前瞻性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Mar;35(3):169-175. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206869. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
2
The Association of Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Acute Coronary Syndrome in Emergency Patients With Chest Pain.急诊胸痛患者心电图异常与急性冠状动脉综合征的关联
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;24(3):344-352. doi: 10.1111/acem.13123.
3
Type 2 myocardial infarction: incidence, presentation, treatment and outcome in routine clinical practice.2型心肌梗死:常规临床实践中的发病率、临床表现、治疗及预后
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2017 May;18(5):341-347. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000504.
4
Use of objective evidence of myocardial ischemia to facilitate the diagnostic and prognostic distinction between type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury.利用心肌缺血的客观证据来促进 2 型心肌梗死和心肌损伤的诊断和预后区分。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Feb;9(1):62-69. doi: 10.1177/2048872618787796. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
5
Causes of Elevated Cardiac Troponins in the Emergency Department and Their Associated Mortality.急诊科中心脏肌钙蛋白升高的原因及其相关死亡率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;23(11):1267-1273. doi: 10.1111/acem.13033. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
6
Type 2 myocardial infarction: A descriptive analysis and comparison with type 1 myocardial infarction.2型心肌梗死:一项描述性分析及与1型心肌梗死的比较
J Cardiol. 2016 Jan;67(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 5.
7
Diagnostic features, management and prognosis of type 2 myocardial infarction compared to type 1 myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与 1 型心肌梗死相比,2 型心肌梗死的诊断特征、治疗和预后:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 17;12(2):e055755. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055755.
8
Incidence, Trends, and Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Community Cohort.2 型心肌梗死在社区队列中的发病率、趋势和结局。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 11;141(6):454-463. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043100. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
9
Classification Algorithm to Distinguish Between Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in Administrative Claims Data.基于行政索赔数据的 1 型和 2 型心肌梗死鉴别分类算法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Feb;17(2):e009986. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.009986. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
10
Mortality following myocardial infarction among HIV-infected persons: the Center for AIDS Research Network Of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS).HIV 感染者心肌梗死后的死亡率:艾滋病研究中心网络综合临床系统(CNICS)。
BMC Med. 2019 Jul 31;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1385-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Myocardial Infarction Signs and Symptoms: Females vs. Males.心肌梗死的体征和症状:女性与男性对比
Cureus. 2023 Apr 13;15(4):e37522. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37522. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Type 1 Myocardial Infarction With a Focus on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.比较2型心肌梗死和1型心肌梗死结局并聚焦双联抗血小板治疗的荟萃分析
CJC Open. 2020 Feb 24;2(3):118-128. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.02.005. eCollection 2020 May.
3
Type 2 myocardial infarction in a patient with acute abdomen due to an incarcerated Amyand's Hernia.
因嵌顿性艾米安德疝导致急腹症患者的2型心肌梗死。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;70:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.03.027. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
4
Type 1 or Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in Patients with a History of Coronary Artery Disease: Data from the Emergency Department.有冠状动脉疾病史患者的1型或2型心肌梗死:来自急诊科的数据。
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 2;8(12):2100. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122100.
5
Cardiac Biomarkers in the Emergency Department: The Role of Soluble ST2 (sST2) in Acute Heart Failure and Acute Coronary Syndrome-There is Meat on the Bone.急诊科中的心脏生物标志物:可溶性ST2(sST2)在急性心力衰竭和急性冠状动脉综合征中的作用——确有实质内容。
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 22;8(2):270. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020270.
6
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Associated With In-Hospital Acute Myocardial Infarction.与院内急性心肌梗死相关的发病率、危险因素和结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7348.
7
Variations on classification of main types of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and outcome meta-analysis.主要类型心肌梗死分类的变化:系统评价和结局荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Jul;108(7):749-762. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1403-3. Epub 2018 Dec 7.