Commentary: Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking.
作者信息
Consoli Gianluca
机构信息
Ministry of Education, Universities and ResearchRome, Italy.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 21;8:1197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01197. eCollection 2017.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary: Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 21;8:1197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01197. eCollection 2017.
2
Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 30;8:15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00015. eCollection 2017.
3
Response: Commentary: Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking.
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 20;9:472. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00472. eCollection 2018.
4
A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: the pleasure-interest model of aesthetic liking.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Nov;19(4):395-410. doi: 10.1177/1088868315574978. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
5
Stimulus Complexity Can Enhance Art Appreciation: Phenomenological and Psychophysiological Evidence for the Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking.
J Intell. 2024 Apr 3;12(4):42. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12040042.
6
The aesthetic aha: on the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Sep;144(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
7
There are no aesthetic emotions: Comment on Menninghaus et al. (2019).
Psychol Rev. 2020 Jul;127(4):640-649. doi: 10.1037/rev0000187.
8
"Aha"ptics: Enjoying an Aesthetic Aha During Haptic Exploration.
Perception. 2019 Jan;48(1):3-25. doi: 10.1177/0301006618818014. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
9
Everything's Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0135944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135944. eCollection 2015.
10
Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.
引用本文的文献
1
Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct;22(5):904-951. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01004-0. Epub 2022 May 19.
2
Response: Commentary: Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking.
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 20;9:472. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00472. eCollection 2018.
本文引用的文献
1
Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 30;8:15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00015. eCollection 2017.
2
When Challenging Art Gets Liked: Evidences for a Dual Preference Formation Process for Fluent and Non-Fluent Portraits.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0131796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131796. eCollection 2015.
3
The stream of experience when watching artistic movies. Dynamic aesthetic effects revealed by the Continuous Evaluation Procedure (CEP).
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 31;6:365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00365. eCollection 2015.
4
A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: the pleasure-interest model of aesthetic liking.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Nov;19(4):395-410. doi: 10.1177/1088868315574978. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
5
The aesthetic aha: on the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Sep;144(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
6
Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures.
Emotion. 2006 Nov;6(4):670-4. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.670.
7
What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest.
Emotion. 2005 Mar;5(1):89-102. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89.
8
Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.
Zotero 插件