Suppr超能文献

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)与内镜治疗肝硬化静脉曲张再出血的比较:一项荟萃分析的更新

TIPS versus endoscopic therapy for variceal rebleeding in cirrhosis: A meta-analysis update.

作者信息

Zhang Hu, Zhang Hui, Li Hui, Zhang Heng, Zheng Dan, Sun Chen-Ming, Wu Jie

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, the Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, China.

Department of Cardiology, the Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, China.

出版信息

J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2017 Aug;37(4):475-485. doi: 10.1007/s11596-017-1760-6. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

Abstract

Endoscopic therapy (ET) is most common method for preventing variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, but the outcomes are not perfect. Recently, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is introduced into clinical practice. However, the beneficial effects of TIPS compared to ET on cirrhotic patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of TIPS with those of the most frequently used ET for prevention of variceal rebleeding (VRB) in liver cirrhosis. The Pub-Med, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 2017. The primary study outcomes included the incidence of VRB, all-cause mortality, bleeding-related death, and the incidence of post-treatment hepatic encephalopathy (PTE). The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled for dichotomous variables. Subgroup analyses were performed. Twenty-four studies were eligible and they included 1120 subjects treated with TIPS and 1065 subjects treated with ET. Although there was no significant difference in survival and PTE, TIPS was superior to ET in decreasing the incidence of VRB (OR=0.27; 95% CI, 0.19-0.39, P<0.00001), and decreasing the incidence of bleeding-related death (OR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.32, P<0.00001). Subgroup analysis found a lower mortality (OR=0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.97; P=0.04) without any increased incidence of PTE (OR=1.37; 95% CI, 0.75-2.50; P=0.31) in the studies of a greater proportion (≥40%) of patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis receiving TIPS, and TIPS with covered stent did not increase the risk of PTE compared to ET (OR=1.52, 95% CI =0.82-2.80, P=0.18). It was concluded that TIPS with covered stent might be considered the preferred choice of therapy in patients with severe liver disease for secondary prophylaxis.

摘要

内镜治疗(ET)是预防肝硬化患者静脉曲张出血最常用的方法,但效果并不理想。近年来,经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)已应用于临床。然而,TIPS与ET相比对肝硬化患者的有益效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估和比较TIPS与最常用的ET预防肝硬化患者静脉曲张再出血(VRB)的效果。检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索时间从建库至2017年2月。主要研究结局包括VRB发生率、全因死亡率、出血相关死亡率以及治疗后肝性脑病(PTE)的发生率。对二分类变量合并95%置信区间(CI)的比值比(OR)。进行亚组分析。24项研究符合纳入标准,其中1120例接受TIPS治疗,1065例接受ET治疗。虽然在生存率和PTE方面无显著差异,但TIPS在降低VRB发生率(OR=0.27;95%CI,0.19-0.39,P<0.00001)以及降低出血相关死亡率(OR=0.21;95%CI,0.13-0.32,P<0.00001)方面优于ET。亚组分析发现,在Child-Pugh C级肝硬化患者比例较高(≥40%)且接受TIPS治疗的研究中,死亡率较低(OR=0.48;95%CI,0.23-0.97;P=0.04),且PTE发生率未增加(OR=1.37;95%CI,0.75-2.50;P=0.31),与ET相比,带覆膜支架的TIPS并未增加PTE风险(OR=1.52,95%CI=0.82-2.80,P=0.18)。研究得出结论,对于严重肝病患者的二级预防,带覆膜支架的TIPS可能是首选治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验