Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA, Case Western School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA and Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA, Case Western School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA and Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2015 Feb;3(1):75-82. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gou095.
Gastric varices are associated with high mortality. There have been conflicting reports on whether endoscopic treatment with cyanoacrylate or the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is more effective in the treatment of gastric varices. We compared the outcomes of patients treated with cyanoacrylate glue or TIPS for the management of acute gastric variceal bleeding.
The study was designed as a retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing either TIPS or endoscopic treatment with cyanoacrylate for acute gastric variceal bleeding at our institution from 2001 to 2011. Primary compared to studied between the two treatment modalities were the short-term treatment outcomes, including re-bleeding within 30 days, length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to assess factors associated with in-hospital mortality.
A total of 169 patients were included in the analysis. The TIPS arm contained 140 patients and the cyanoacrylate arm contained 29 patients. There was no evidence to suggest any significant differences in demographics or disease severity. There were no differences between the TIPS arm and the cyanoacrylate armtwo groups in treatment outcomes including re-bleeding within 30 days (17.4% vs. 17.2%; P = 0.98), median length of stay in the hospital (4.5 days vs. 6.0 days; P = 0.35) or in-hospital mortality (9.0% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.74). In-hospital mortality was evaluated for 149 patients and lower albumin (P = 0.015), higher MELD score (P < 0.001), higher CTP score (P = 0.005) and bleeding (P = 0.008) were all significantly associated with in-hospital death.
These findings suggest that both treatments are equally effective. Cyanoacrylate offers a safe, effective alternative to TIPS for gastric varices, and physician may choose the best therapy for each patient, factoring in the availability of TIPS or cyanoacrylate, the individual patient's presentation, and cost.
胃静脉曲张与高死亡率相关。关于使用氰基丙烯酸酯内镜治疗或经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗胃静脉曲张哪个更有效的报告存在冲突。我们比较了使用氰基丙烯酸酯胶或 TIPS 治疗急性胃静脉曲张出血的患者的结局。
本研究是对 2001 年至 2011 年在我院接受 TIPS 或内镜下氰基丙烯酸酯治疗急性胃静脉曲张出血的患者进行的回顾性队列分析。将两种治疗方法的短期治疗结局(包括 30 天内再出血、住院时间和住院死亡率)进行主要比较。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析评估与住院死亡率相关的因素。
共有 169 例患者纳入分析。TIPS 组 140 例,氰基丙烯酸酯组 29 例。两组在人口统计学和疾病严重程度方面均无明显差异。TIPS 组和氰基丙烯酸酯组在治疗结局方面无差异,包括 30 天内再出血(17.4% vs. 17.2%;P = 0.98)、中位住院时间(4.5 天 vs. 6.0 天;P = 0.35)或住院死亡率(9.0% vs. 11.1%;P = 0.74)。对 149 例患者进行了院内死亡率评估,较低的白蛋白(P = 0.015)、较高的 MELD 评分(P < 0.001)、较高的 CTP 评分(P = 0.005)和出血(P = 0.008)均与院内死亡显著相关。
这些发现表明两种治疗方法同样有效。氰基丙烯酸酯为胃静脉曲张提供了一种安全有效的 TIPS 替代治疗方法,医生可以根据 TIPS 或氰基丙烯酸酯的可用性、患者的个体表现和成本来为每位患者选择最佳治疗方法。