• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有乳腺癌个人病史女性补充性乳腺超声筛查的诊断效能

Diagnostic performances of supplemental breast ultrasound screening in women with personal history of breast cancer.

作者信息

Song Sung Eun, Cho Nariya, Chang Jung Min, Chu A Jung, Yi Ann, Moon Woo Kyung

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

2 Department of Radiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2018 May;59(5):533-539. doi: 10.1177/0284185117725779. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1177/0284185117725779
PMID:28786298
Abstract

Background Supplemental breast ultrasonography (US) has been used as a surveillance imaging method in women with personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). However, there have been limited data regarding diagnostic performances. Purpose To evaluate diagnostic performances of supplemental breast US screening for women with PHBC and to compare with those for women without PHBC. Material and Methods Between 2011 and 2012, 12,230 supplemental US exams were performed in 12,230 women with negative mammograms: 6584 women with PHBC and 5646 women without PHBC. Cancer detection rate, interval cancer rate, abnormal interpretation rate, positive predictive values (PPVs), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared. Results Overall cancer detection rate and first-year interval cancer rate were 1.80/1000 exams and 0.91/1000 negative exams, both of which were higher in women with PHBC than in women without PHBC (2.88 vs. 0.53 per 1000, P = 0.003; 1.50 vs. 0.20 per 1000, P = 0.027). Abnormal interpretation rate was lower in the women with PHBC than in women without PHBC (9.1% vs. 12.1%, P < 0.001). Sensitivity was not different (67.9% vs. 75.0%, P = 1.000), whereas specificity and PPV were higher in women with PHBC than in women without PHBC (91.2% vs. 88.0%, P < 0.001; 22.6% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.001). The majority of detected cancers in women with PHBC (78.9%, 15/19) were stage 0 or 1. Conclusion Supplemental breast US screening increases early stage second breast cancers with high specificity and PPV in women with PHBC, however, high interval cancer rate in younger women with PHBC should be noted.

摘要

背景

补充性乳腺超声检查(US)已被用作有乳腺癌个人史(PHBC)女性的监测成像方法。然而,关于其诊断性能的数据有限。目的:评估补充性乳腺超声筛查对有PHBC女性的诊断性能,并与无PHBC女性的诊断性能进行比较。材料与方法:2011年至2012年期间,对12230名乳腺X线摄影检查结果为阴性的女性进行了12230次补充性超声检查:6584名有PHBC的女性和5646名无PHBC的女性。计算并比较癌症检出率、间期癌症发生率、异常解读率、阳性预测值(PPV)、敏感性和特异性。结果:总体癌症检出率和第一年间期癌症发生率分别为1.80/1000次检查和0.91/1000次阴性检查,两者在有PHBC的女性中均高于无PHBC的女性(每1000次检查中分别为2.88对0.53,P = 0.003;每1000次检查中分别为1.50对0.20,P = 0.027)。有PHBC的女性异常解读率低于无PHBC的女性(9.1%对12.1%,P < 0.001)。敏感性无差异(67.9%对75.0%,P = 1.000),而有PHBC的女性特异性和PPV高于无PHBC的女性(91.2%对88.0%,P < 0.001;22.6%对3.1%,P < 0.001)。有PHBC女性中检测到的大多数癌症(78.9%,15/19)为0期或1期。结论:补充性乳腺超声筛查可提高有PHBC女性早期第二原发性乳腺癌的检出率,特异性和PPV较高,然而,应注意有PHBC的年轻女性间期癌症发生率较高。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic performances of supplemental breast ultrasound screening in women with personal history of breast cancer.有乳腺癌个人病史女性补充性乳腺超声筛查的诊断效能
Acta Radiol. 2018 May;59(5):533-539. doi: 10.1177/0284185117725779. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
2
Supplemental Breast US Screening in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.乳腺癌病史女性的补充性乳腺超声筛查:一项匹配队列研究。
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):54-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191691. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer.有早期乳腺癌个人病史的女性进行筛查性乳房 X 光检查的准确性和结果。
JAMA. 2011 Feb 23;305(8):790-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.188.
4
BreastScreen-based mammography screening in women with a personal history of breast cancer, Western Australian study.基于乳腺筛查的乳腺癌患者乳腺钼靶筛查:来自澳大利亚西部的研究。
Med J Aust. 2011 Oct 17;195(8):460-4. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10702.
5
Breast Biopsy Intensity and Findings Following Breast Cancer Screening in Women With and Without a Personal History of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌筛查中有无乳腺癌个人史女性的乳腺活检强度和结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Apr 1;178(4):458-468. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8549.
6
Outcomes Following Negative Screening MRI Results in Korean Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Implications for the Next MRI Interval.韩国有乳腺癌个人病史女性的MRI筛查结果为阴性后的转归:对下一次MRI检查间隔时间的启示
Radiology. 2021 Aug;300(2):303-311. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204217. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
Interval Cancers after Negative Supplemental Screening Breast MRI Results in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌病史女性阴性补充乳腺 MRI 筛查结果后的间期癌。
Radiology. 2021 Aug;300(2):314-323. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203074. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
9
Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.将降级标准应用于乳腺钼靶检查阴性但乳腺致密的女性的补充筛查超声检查。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(44):e5279. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005279.
10
Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk.筛查超声联合筛查乳腺 X 线摄影在不同乳腺癌风险女性中的应用效能。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):658-667. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8372.

引用本文的文献

1
Surveillance Outcomes by Imaging Methods in the First 5 Years After Breast Cancer Surgery.乳腺癌手术后前5年通过影像学方法的监测结果
Korean J Radiol. 2025 Jun;26(6):532-545. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.1101. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance.对有乳腺癌个人病史的女性进行筛查:乳腺影像监测证据综述
Ultrasonography. 2018 Oct;37(4):277-287. doi: 10.14366/usg.18017. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
Cumulative Risk Distribution for Interval Invasive Second Breast Cancers After Negative Surveillance Mammography.
阴性监测乳腺钼靶摄影后间隔期侵袭性第二乳腺癌的累积风险分布。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2070-2077. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8267. Epub 2018 May 2.