Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Apr 1;178(4):458-468. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8549.
There is little evidence on population-based harms and benefits of screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women with and without a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC).
To evaluate biopsy rates and yield in the 90 days following screening (mammography vs magnetic resonance imaging with or without mammography) among women with and without a PHBC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational cohort study of 6 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries. Population-based sample of 812 164 women undergoing screening, 2003 through 2013.
A total of 2 048 994 digital mammography and/or breast MRI screening episodes (mammogram alone vs MRI with or without screening mammogram within 30 days).
Biopsy intensity (surgical greater than core greater than fine-needle aspiration) and yield (invasive cancer greater than ductal carcinoma in situ greater than high-risk benign greater than benign) within 90 days of a screening episode. We computed age-adjusted rates of biopsy intensity (per 1000 screening episodes) and biopsy yield (per 1000 screening episodes with biopsies). Outcomes were stratified by PHBC and by BCSC 5-year breast cancer risk among women without PHBC.
We included 101 103 and 1 939 455 mammogram screening episodes in women with and without PHBC, respectively; MRI screening episodes included 3763 with PHBC and 4673 without PHBC. Age-adjusted core and surgical biopsy rates (per 1000 episodes) doubled (57.1; 95% CI, 50.3-65.1) following MRI compared with mammography (23.6; 95% CI, 22.4-24.8) in women with PHBC. Differences (per 1000 episodes) were even larger in women without PHBC: 84.7 (95% CI, 75.9-94.9) following MRI and 14.9 (95% CI, 14.7-15.0) following mammography episodes. Ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive biopsy yield (per 1000 episodes) was significantly higher following mammography compared with MRI episodes in women with PHBC (mammography, 404.6; 95% CI, 381.2-428.8; MRI, 267.6; 95% CI, 208.0-337.8) and nonsignificantly higher, but in the same direction, in women without PHBC (mammography, 279.3; 95% CI, 274.2-284.4; MRI, 214.6; 95% CI, 158.7-280.8). High-risk benign lesions were more commonly identified following MRI regardless of PHBC. Higher biopsy rates and lower cancer yield following MRI were not explained by increasing age or higher 5-year breast cancer risk.
Women with and without PHBC who undergo screening MRI experience higher biopsy rates coupled with significantly lower cancer yield findings following biopsy compared with screening mammography alone. Further work is needed to identify women who will benefit from screening MRI to ensure an acceptable benefit-to-harm ratio.
关于在有和没有乳腺癌个人史(PHBC)的女性中进行乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)筛查的人群基于危害和获益,证据很少。
评估有和没有 PHBC 的女性在筛查后 90 天内(乳腺 X 线摄影与 MRI 联合或不联合乳腺 X 线摄影)进行活检的比例和阳性率。
设计、地点和参与者:对 6 个乳腺癌监测联盟(BCSC)登记处进行的观察性队列研究。这是一项基于人群的样本研究,共纳入 812164 名接受筛查的女性,筛查时间为 2003 年至 2013 年。
共进行了 2048994 次数字乳腺 X 线摄影和/或乳腺 MRI 筛查(单独乳腺 X 线摄影与 MRI 检查,或在 30 天内联合乳腺 X 线摄影)。
在筛查后 90 天内的活检强度(手术>核心>细针抽吸)和阳性率(浸润性癌>导管原位癌>高危良性>良性)。我们计算了每 1000 次筛查的活检强度(每 1000 次筛查的活检率)和活检阳性率(每 1000 次有活检的筛查的阳性率)。根据 PHBC 和无 PHBC 女性的 BCSC 5 年乳腺癌风险分层了结果。
我们分别纳入了 101103 次和 1939455 次有 PHBC 和无 PHBC 女性的乳腺 X 线摄影筛查,其中 MRI 筛查分别纳入了 3763 例有 PHBC 女性和 4673 例无 PHBC 女性。与乳腺 X 线摄影相比,有 PHBC 的女性接受 MRI 检查后核心和手术活检率(每 1000 次检查)增加了一倍(57.1;95%CI,50.3-65.1)。无 PHBC 的女性差异更大:MRI 检查后为 84.7(95%CI,75.9-94.9),而乳腺 X 线摄影检查后为 14.9(95%CI,14.7-15.0)。有 PHBC 的女性接受乳腺 X 线摄影检查后,导管原位癌和浸润性癌活检阳性率(每 1000 次检查)明显高于 MRI 检查(乳腺 X 线摄影,404.6;95%CI,381.2-428.8;MRI,267.6;95%CI,208.0-337.8),无 PHBC 女性的差异虽不显著,但方向相同(乳腺 X 线摄影,279.3;95%CI,274.2-284.4;MRI,214.6;95%CI,158.7-280.8)。无论是否有 PHBC,MRI 检查后高危良性病变更为常见。MRI 检查后活检率更高,癌症阳性率更低,这一结果与年龄增长或更高的 5 年乳腺癌风险无关。
有和没有 PHBC 的女性在进行 MRI 筛查后,进行活检的比例更高,而活检后的癌症阳性率却明显降低。为了确保可接受的获益-危害比,需要进一步研究以确定哪些女性将从 MRI 筛查中受益。