• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤患者的 10 米行走速度:速度能预测谁能行走和谁需要滚动吗?

Ten Meters Walking Speed in Spinal Cord-Injured Patients: Does Speed Predict Who Walks and Who Rolls?

机构信息

1 Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

2 Klinik Hohe Warte Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.

出版信息

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Sep;31(9):842-850. doi: 10.1177/1545968317723751. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1177/1545968317723751
PMID:28786305
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Walking speed is assumed to be a key factor in regaining ambulation after spinal cord injury (SCI). However, from the literature it remains unclear which walking speed usually results in independent community ambulation.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to determine at which walking speed SCI patients tend to walk in the community instead of using a wheelchair. The secondary aim was to investigate clinical conditions that favor independent ambulation in the community.

METHODS

Data from SCI patients were collected retrospectively from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury database. We determined a cutoff walking speed at which the patients tend to walk in the community by plotting a receiver operating characteristics curve, using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure for outdoor mobility. Univariate analyses investigated which factors influence independent community ambulation.

RESULTS

A walking speed of 0.59 m/s is the cutoff between patients who do and do not ambulate independently in the community, with a sensitivity of 91.6% and a specificity of 80.3%. Age, injury severity, and lower limb muscle strength have a significant influence on independent community ambulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with an SCI who regain a walking speed of 0.59 m/s tend to achieve a level of walking effectiveness that allows for independent community walking. Although such patients tend to be younger and less severely injured, this walking speed can be a target for locomotor training in rehabilitation and clinical trials that lead to a meaningful outcome level of community walking.

摘要

背景

步行速度被认为是脊髓损伤(SCI)后恢复行走能力的关键因素。然而,从文献中仍然不清楚通常哪种步行速度会导致独立的社区行走。

目的

本研究的主要目的是确定 SCI 患者在社区中倾向于行走而不是使用轮椅的步行速度。次要目的是调查有利于社区独立行走的临床条件。

方法

从欧洲多中心脊髓损伤数据库中回顾性收集 SCI 患者的数据。我们通过绘制接受者操作特征曲线来确定患者倾向于在社区中行走的临界步行速度,使用户外移动性脊髓独立性测量来确定。单变量分析调查了哪些因素影响独立的社区行走。

结果

步行速度为 0.59 m/s 是患者在社区中独立行走和不独立行走的临界点,灵敏度为 91.6%,特异性为 80.3%。年龄、损伤严重程度和下肢肌肉力量对独立社区行走有显著影响。

结论

恢复 0.59 m/s 步行速度的 SCI 患者倾向于达到允许独立社区行走的行走效果水平。尽管这些患者往往更年轻,损伤程度较轻,但这种步行速度可以作为康复和临床试验中运动训练的目标,以达到有意义的社区行走水平。

相似文献

1
Ten Meters Walking Speed in Spinal Cord-Injured Patients: Does Speed Predict Who Walks and Who Rolls?脊髓损伤患者的 10 米行走速度:速度能预测谁能行走和谁需要滚动吗?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Sep;31(9):842-850. doi: 10.1177/1545968317723751. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
2
Gait speed in relation to categories of functional ambulation after spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤后步态速度与功能性步行分类的关系。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 May;23(4):343-50. doi: 10.1177/1545968308324224. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
3
Physical impairment and walking function required for community ambulation in patients with cervical incomplete spinal cord injury.颈髓不完全性损伤患者社区行走所需的身体功能障碍与步行功能
Spinal Cord. 2014 May;52(5):396-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.18. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
4
A simplified clinical prediction rule for prognosticating independent walking after spinal cord injury: a prospective study from a Canadian multicenter spinal cord injury registry.一种用于预测脊髓损伤后独立行走能力的简化临床预测规则:一项来自加拿大多中心脊髓损伤登记处的前瞻性研究。
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1383-1392. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
5
A prediction model for determining over ground walking speed after locomotor training in persons with motor incomplete spinal cord injury.一种用于确定运动不完全性脊髓损伤患者运动训练后地面行走速度的预测模型。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(1):63-71. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2009.11760754.
6
Against the odds: what to expect in rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury with a neurologically controlled Hybrid Assistive Limb exoskeleton. A subgroup analysis of 55 patients according to age and lesion level.克服重重困难:使用神经控制的混合辅助肢体外骨骼对慢性脊髓损伤进行康复治疗的预期效果。根据年龄和损伤水平对55例患者进行的亚组分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E15. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS171.
7
Activity-based therapy for recovery of walking in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: results from a randomized clinical trial.基于活动的疗法对慢性脊髓损伤患者步行功能恢复的影响:一项随机临床试验的结果
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Dec;95(12):2239-46.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.400. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
8
Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial.一种运动训练方法对慢性脊髓损伤患者行走速度和距离的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Phys Ther. 2011 Jan;91(1):48-60. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090359. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
9
Lokomat robotic-assisted versus overground training within 3 to 6 months of incomplete spinal cord lesion: randomized controlled trial.3 至 6 个月不完全性脊髓损伤后使用 Lokomat 机器人辅助与地面训练:随机对照试验。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Nov-Dec;26(9):1058-63. doi: 10.1177/1545968312448232. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
10
Relationship between ASIA examination and functional outcomes in the NeuroRecovery Network Locomotor Training Program.ASIA 检查与神经康复网络运动训练计划功能结果的关系。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;93(9):1530-40. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.035.

引用本文的文献

1
Outdoor experiences and outdoor-based activities and interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic scoping review.脊髓损伤患者的户外体验、户外活动及干预措施:一项系统综述。
J Rehabil Med. 2025 Jan 21;57:jrm40705. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.40705.
2
Gait training using a wearable robotic hip device for incomplete spinal cord injury: A preliminary study.使用可穿戴机器人髋关节装置对不完全性脊髓损伤患者进行步态训练:一项初步研究。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 Mar;48(2):208-220. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2273587. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
3
Assessing walking ability using a robotic gait trainer: opportunities and limitations of assist-as-needed control in spinal cord injury.
使用机器人步态训练器评估行走能力:脊髓损伤中按需辅助控制的机会和局限性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Sep 21;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01226-4.
4
Using the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool at Discharge Predicts Community Outdoor Walking Capacity in Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.使用出院时的站立和行走评估工具预测外伤性脊髓损伤患者的社区户外行走能力。
Phys Ther. 2023 Nov 4;103(11). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad106.
5
Orthotic walking outcome of persons with motor complete low thoracic spinal cord injury-a retrospective study.运动完全性胸段低位脊髓损伤患者的矫形步行结果——一项回顾性研究
Spinal Cord. 2023 Mar;61(3):224-230. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00875-5. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
6
Stabilization Strategies for Fast Walking in Challenging Environments With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤不完全患者在具有挑战性环境中快速行走的稳定策略
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Aug 19;2:709420. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.709420. eCollection 2021.
7
Intramuscular coherence during challenging walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: Reduced high-frequency coherence reflects impaired supra-spinal control.不完全性脊髓损伤患者在具有挑战性的行走过程中的肌内协调性:高频协调性降低反映了脊髓上控制受损。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 3;16:927704. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.927704. eCollection 2022.
8
Walking and Balance Outcomes Are Improved Following Brief Intensive Locomotor Skill Training but Are Not Augmented by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Persons With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.对于慢性脊髓损伤患者,短暂强化运动技能训练后步行和平衡结果有所改善,但经颅直流电刺激并未增强这种改善效果。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 May 11;16:849297. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.849297. eCollection 2022.
9
Mind your step: Target walking task reveals gait disturbance in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.当心脚下:目标行走任务揭示不完全性脊髓损伤个体的步态障碍。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Mar 25;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01013-7.
10
Comparing the causes, circumstances and consequences of falls across mobility statuses among individuals with spinal cord injury: A secondary analysis.比较脊髓损伤患者不同移动状态下跌倒的原因、情况和后果:二次分析。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2021;44(sup1):S193-S202. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1956252.