• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于预测脊髓损伤后独立行走能力的简化临床预测规则:一项来自加拿大多中心脊髓损伤登记处的前瞻性研究。

A simplified clinical prediction rule for prognosticating independent walking after spinal cord injury: a prospective study from a Canadian multicenter spinal cord injury registry.

作者信息

Hicks Katharine E, Zhao Yichen, Fallah Nader, Rivers Carly S, Noonan Vanessa K, Plashkes Tova, Wai Eugene K, Roffey Darren M, Tsai Eve C, Paquet Jerome, Attabib Najmedden, Marion Travis, Ahn Henry, Phan Philippe

机构信息

Ottawa Combined Adult Spinal Surgery Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada.

Rick Hansen Institute, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, 6400-818 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; The University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

出版信息

Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1383-1392. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

DOI:
10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.031
PMID:28716636
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition with limited treatment options for neurologic or functional recovery. The ability to predict the prognosis of walking post injury with emerging prediction models could aid in rehabilitation strategies and reintegration into the community.

PURPOSE

To revalidate an existing clinical prediction model for independent ambulation (van Middendorp et al., 2011) using acute and long-term post-injury follow-up data, and to investigatethe accuracy of a simplified model using prospectively collected data from a Canadian multicenter SCI database, the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANT SAMPLE

The analysis cohort consisted of 278 adult individuals with traumatic SCI enrolled in the RHSCIR for whom complete neurologic examination data and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) outcome data were available.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The FIM locomotor score was used to assess independent walking ability (defined as modified or complete independence in walk or combined walk and wheelchair modality) at 1-year follow-up for each participant.

METHODS

A logistic regression (LR) model based on age and four neurologic variables was applied to our cohort of 278 RHSCIR participants. Additionally, a simplified LR model was created. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was used to check if the predictive model is applicable to our data set. The performance of the model was verified by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The accuracy of the model was tested using a cross-validation technique. This study was supported by a grant from The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization ($50,000 over 2 years). The RHSCIR is sponsored by the Rick Hansen Institute and is supported by funding from Health Canada, Western Economic Diversification Canada, and the provincial governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, and Ontario. ET and JP report receiving grants from the Rick Hansen Institute (approximately $60,000 and $30,000 per year, respectively). DMR reports receiving remuneration for consulting services provided to Palladian Health, LLC and Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc ($20,000-$30,000 annually), although neither relationship presents a potential conflict of interest with the submitted work. KEH received a grant for involvement in the present study from the Government of Canada as part of the Canada Summer Jobs Program ($3,000). JP reports receiving an educational grant from Medtronic Canada outside of the submitted work ($75,000 annually). TM reports receiving educational fellowship support from AO Spine, AO Trauma, and Medtronic; however, none of these relationships are financial in nature. All remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

RESULTS

The fitted prediction model generated 85% overall classification accuracy, 79% sensitivity, and 90% specificity. The prediction model was able to accurately classify independent walking ability (AUC 0.889, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.846-0.933, p<.001) compared with the existing prediction model, despite the use of a different outcome measure (FIM vs. Spinal Cord Independence Measure) to qualify walking ability. A simplified, three-variable LR model based on age and two neurologic variables had an overall classification accuracy of 84%, with 76% sensitivity and 90% specificity, demonstrating comparable accuracy with its five-variable prediction model counterpart. The AUC was 0.866 (95% CI 0.816-0.916, p<.01), only marginally less than that of the existing prediction model.

CONCLUSIONS

A simplified predictive model with similar accuracy to a more complex model for predicting independent walking was created, which improves utility in a clinical setting. Such models will allow clinicians to better predict the prognosis of ambulation in individuals who have sustained a traumatic SCI.

摘要

背景

创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)是一种使人衰弱的疾病,神经或功能恢复的治疗选择有限。利用新兴的预测模型预测损伤后行走预后的能力有助于制定康复策略并重新融入社区。

目的

使用损伤后急性和长期随访数据重新验证现有的独立行走临床预测模型(van Middendorp等人,2011年),并利用从加拿大多中心SCI数据库里克·汉森脊髓损伤登记处(RHSCIR)前瞻性收集的数据研究简化模型的准确性。

研究设计

前瞻性队列研究。

参与者样本

分析队列由278名患有创伤性SCI的成年个体组成,这些个体被纳入RHSCIR,并有完整的神经学检查数据和功能独立性测量(FIM)结果数据。

结局指标

FIM运动评分用于评估每位参与者在1年随访时的独立行走能力(定义为在行走或行走与轮椅组合方式上的改良或完全独立)。

方法

基于年龄和四个神经学变量的逻辑回归(LR)模型应用于我们的278名RHSCIR参与者队列。此外,创建了一个简化的LR模型。使用Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验来检查预测模型是否适用于我们的数据集。通过计算受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积来验证模型的性能。使用交叉验证技术测试模型的准确性。本研究得到渥太华医院学术医疗组织的一项资助(两年内50,000美元)。RHSCIR由里克·汉森研究所赞助,并得到加拿大卫生部、加拿大西部经济多样化部以及艾伯塔省、不列颠哥伦比亚省、马尼托巴省和安大略省政府的资金支持。ET和JP报告从里克·汉森研究所获得资助(分别约为每年60,000美元和30,000美元)。DMR报告因向Palladian Health, LLC和Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc提供咨询服务而获得报酬(每年20,000 - 30,000美元),尽管这两种关系与提交的工作均不存在潜在利益冲突。KEH作为加拿大暑期工作计划的一部分,从加拿大政府获得参与本研究的资助(3,000美元)。JP报告在提交的工作之外从美敦力加拿大公司获得教育资助(每年75,000美元)。TM报告获得AO脊柱、AO创伤和美敦力的教育奖学金支持;然而,这些关系均非财务性质。其余所有作者均无利益冲突需要披露。

结果

拟合的预测模型总体分类准确率为85%,敏感性为79%,特异性为90%。尽管使用了不同的结局指标(FIM与脊髓独立性测量)来界定行走能力,但与现有预测模型相比,该预测模型能够准确分类独立行走能力(AUC 0.889,95%置信区间[CI] 0.846 - 0.933,p <.001)。基于年龄和两个神经学变量的简化三变量LR模型总体分类准确率为84%,敏感性为76%,特异性为90%,与其五变量预测模型对应物具有可比的准确性。AUC为0.866(95% CI 0.816 - 0.916,p <.01),仅略低于现有预测模型。

结论

创建了一个与更复杂的预测独立行走模型准确性相似的简化预测模型,提高了其在临床环境中的实用性。此类模型将使临床医生能够更好地预测创伤性SCI患者的行走预后。

相似文献

1
A simplified clinical prediction rule for prognosticating independent walking after spinal cord injury: a prospective study from a Canadian multicenter spinal cord injury registry.一种用于预测脊髓损伤后独立行走能力的简化临床预测规则:一项来自加拿大多中心脊髓损伤登记处的前瞻性研究。
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1383-1392. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
2
Development of an unsupervised machine learning algorithm for the prognostication of walking ability in spinal cord injury patients.开发一种用于预测脊髓损伤患者行走能力的无监督机器学习算法。
Spine J. 2020 Feb;20(2):213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
3
Highlighting discrepancies in walking prediction accuracy for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: an evaluation of validated prediction models using a Canadian Multicenter Spinal Cord Injury Registry.突出外伤性脊髓损伤患者步行预测准确性的差异:使用加拿大多中心脊髓损伤注册中心评估验证预测模型。
Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):703-710. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
4
The effect of age and injury severity on clinical prediction rules for ambulation among individuals with spinal cord injury.年龄和损伤严重程度对脊髓损伤患者步行临床预测规则的影响。
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1666-1675. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.551. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
Predicting Recruitment Feasibility for Acute Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trials in Canada Using National Registry Data.利用国家登记数据预测加拿大急性脊髓损伤临床试验的招募可行性
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Feb;34(3):599-606. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4568. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
A clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study.创伤性脊髓损伤后步行能力结局的临床预测规则:一项纵向队列研究。
Lancet. 2011 Mar 19;377(9770):1004-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62276-3. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
7
The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR): a national patient-registry.瑞克·汉森脊髓损伤注册研究(RHSCIR):一个全国性的患者注册研究。
Spinal Cord. 2012 Jan;50(1):22-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.109. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
8
Development and assessment of a community follow-up questionnaire for the Rick Hansen spinal cord injury registry.开发和评估里克·汉森脊髓损伤登记处的社区随访问卷。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1753-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
9
Clinical Prediction Rule Validation for Ambulation Outcome After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in a Spanish Population.临床预测规则验证:西班牙人群创伤性脊髓损伤后行走能力的结果。
J Trauma Nurs. 2022;29(4):201-209. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000662.
10
Health Conditions: Effect on Function, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. A Prospective Observational Registry Cohort Study.健康状况:对创伤性脊髓损伤后功能、健康相关生活质量和生活满意度的影响。一项前瞻性观察性登记队列研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Traumatic spinal cord injury in the elderly: predictors for mortality and functional outcomes.老年人创伤性脊髓损伤:死亡率和功能结局的预测因素
J Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 27;11(2):216-226. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-138. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Exploring the Landscape of Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury.探索脊髓损伤生物标志物的前景
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2025 Spring;31(2):1-12. doi: 10.46292/sci24-00076. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
3
Predictors of Early Mortality After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa.南非创伤性脊髓损伤后早期死亡率的预测因素
Global Spine J. 2025 May;15(4):2359-2366. doi: 10.1177/21925682241300269. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
4
Predictive modeling of ambulatory outcomes after spinal cord injury using machine learning.基于机器学习的脊髓损伤后门诊治疗结局预测模型。
Spinal Cord. 2024 Aug;62(8):446-453. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-01008-2. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
5
Prediction of gait recovery using machine learning algorithms in patients with spinal cord injury.基于机器学习算法预测脊髓损伤患者的步态恢复。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38286. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038286.
6
Editorial: Epidemiology, evidence-based care, and outcomes in spinal cord injury.社论:脊髓损伤的流行病学、循证医疗与治疗结果
Front Neurol. 2024 Mar 4;15:1383757. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1383757. eCollection 2024.
7
Are Clinical Prediction Rules Used in Spinal Cord Injury Care? A Survey of Practice.临床预测规则是否用于脊髓损伤护理?实践调查。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024 Winter;30(1):45-58. doi: 10.46292/sci23-00069. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
8
Multivariable Prediction Models for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.多变量预测模型在创伤性脊髓损伤中的应用:系统综述。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024 Winter;30(1):1-44. doi: 10.46292/sci23-00010. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
9
Enabling knowledge translation: implementation of a web-based tool for independent walking prediction after traumatic spinal cord injury.促进知识转化:实施一种用于创伤性脊髓损伤后独立行走预测的基于网络的工具。
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 5;14:1219307. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1219307. eCollection 2023.
10
Guidelines for neuroprognostication in adults with traumatic spinal cord injury.成人创伤性脊髓损伤神经预后指南。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Apr;40(2):415-437. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01845-8. Epub 2023 Nov 13.