• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全谱内镜实施后腺瘤检出率的变化:3998 例筛查结肠镜检查报告。

Changes in Adenoma Detection Rate With Implementation of Full-spectrum Endoscopy: A Report of 3998 Screening Colonoscopies.

机构信息

Department of Medicine.

The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov/Dec;52(10):885-890. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000874.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000874
PMID:28787359
Abstract

GOALS

To investigate the effect of implementing full-spectrum endoscopy (Fuse) on adenoma detection rate (ADR) at an ambulatory surgical center (ASC).

BACKGROUND

Traditional forward viewing (TFV) endoscopes have 1 camera and provide an angle of view of 140 to 170 degrees, whereas Fuse provides a 330 degrees view through the addition of 2 side cameras. Although randomized studies have shown that Fuse decreases adenoma miss rates, its impact on ADR in a screening population is currently unknown.

STUDY

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from average risk screening colonoscopies at a 5-room ASC. This ASC transitioned from TFV to Fuse in April 2014. The primary outcome was ADR defined as the percentage of patients who underwent screening colonoscopy and were found to have at least 1 adenomatous polyp.

RESULTS

A total of 1696 screening colonoscopies were performed with TFV and 2302 with Fuse. Overall ADR was 23.7% with TFV and 29.0% with Fuse (P<0.01), an absolute increase of 5.3%. ADR for the proximal colon increased from 13.0% with TFV to 16.7% with Fuse (3.8% increase, P<0.01). ADR for advanced adenomas improved from 3.8% with TFV to 6.0% with Fuse (2.2% increase; P<0.01). The mean number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy increased from 0.32 to 0.41 (P<0.01). In multivariate analysis, the adjusted odds ratio for detecting an adenoma with Fuse versus TFV was 1.30 (P<0.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.51).

CONCLUSIONS

ADR significantly increased after adopting Fuse endoscopes at an ASC. Further studies are warranted to further understand the effects of Fuse on ADR in real-world settings.

摘要

目的

研究在门诊手术中心(ASC)实施全谱内镜(Fuse)对腺瘤检出率(ADR)的影响。

背景

传统的前视(TFV)内窥镜只有 1 个摄像头,视角为 140 度至 170 度,而 Fuse 通过增加 2 个侧摄像头提供 330 度的视野。尽管随机研究表明 Fuse 降低了腺瘤漏诊率,但它对筛查人群中 ADR 的影响尚不清楚。

研究

我们对 5 个房间 ASC 的平均风险筛查结肠镜检查数据进行了回顾性分析。该 ASC 于 2014 年 4 月从 TFV 过渡到 Fuse。主要结果是 ADR,定义为接受筛查结肠镜检查且至少发现 1 个腺瘤性息肉的患者百分比。

结果

共进行了 1696 例 TFV 筛查结肠镜检查和 2302 例 Fuse 筛查结肠镜检查。TFV 的总体 ADR 为 23.7%,Fuse 的 ADR 为 29.0%(P<0.01),绝对增加了 5.3%。TFV 的近端结肠 ADR 从 13.0%增加到 Fuse 的 16.7%(增加 3.8%,P<0.01)。TFV 的高级腺瘤 ADR 从 3.8%增加到 Fuse 的 6.0%(增加 2.2%;P<0.01)。每例结肠镜检查发现的腺瘤数量从 0.32 个增加到 0.41 个(P<0.01)。多变量分析中,Fuse 与 TFV 相比,检测腺瘤的调整优势比为 1.30(P<0.01;95%置信区间,1.11-1.51)。

结论

在 ASC 采用 Fuse 内窥镜后,ADR 显著增加。需要进一步研究以进一步了解 Fuse 在实际环境中对 ADR 的影响。

相似文献

1
Changes in Adenoma Detection Rate With Implementation of Full-spectrum Endoscopy: A Report of 3998 Screening Colonoscopies.全谱内镜实施后腺瘤检出率的变化:3998 例筛查结肠镜检查报告。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov/Dec;52(10):885-890. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000874.
2
Changes in Adenoma Detection Rate From Full-Spectrum Endoscopy to Standard Forward-Viewing Endoscopy.从全谱内镜到标准前视内镜腺瘤检测率的变化。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 1;57(4):404-409. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001706.
3
Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme.全谱(FUSE)与标准前视结肠镜检查在有组织的结直肠癌筛查计划中的比较。
Gut. 2017 Nov;66(11):1949-1955. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311906. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
4
Full spectrum endoscopy (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing endoscope (SFV) in a high-risk population.高风险人群中全光谱内镜检查(FUSE)与标准前视内镜(SFV)的比较
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;52(11):1298-1303. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1363278. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
5
Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.提供锯齿状息肉检出率基准数据:新罕布什尔结肠镜检查登记处的分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1188-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
6
New-generation full-spectrum endoscopy versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, tandem colonoscopy trial (J-FUSE Study).新一代全谱内镜与标准前视结肠镜检查的比较:一项多中心、随机、串联结肠镜检查试验(J-FUSE 研究)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Nov;88(5):854-864. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
7
Defining Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Due to a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test.确定因粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性而接受结肠镜检查的患者的腺瘤检出率和每次结肠镜检查腺瘤数量的基准。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1743-1749. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.449. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
8
The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.录像结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
9
Role of Full-spectrum Endoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomized Trial.全谱内镜在结直肠癌筛查中的作用:随机试验。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;53(3):191-196. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000975.
10
Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.筛查结肠镜检查期间的非肿瘤性息肉切除术:对息肉检出率、腺瘤检出率及总体成本的影响
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):370-375.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic value of novel retroflexion colonoscopy in the right colon: A randomized controlled trial.新型结肠后屈式结肠镜检查对右半结肠的诊断价值:一项随机对照试验。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Nov 15;12(11):1336-1345. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i11.1336.